Graph explorer

Finitary languages

The class of omega-regular languages provides a robust specification language in verification. Every omega-regular condition can be decomposed into a safety part and a liveness part. The liveness part ensures that something good happens "eventually". Finitary liveness was proposed by Alur and Henzinger as a stronger formulation of liveness. It requires that there exists an unknown, fixed bound b such that something good happens within b transitions. In this work we consider automata with finitary acceptance conditions defined by finitary Buchi, parity and Streett languages. We study languages expressible by such automata: we give their topological complexity and present a regular-expression characterization. We compare the expressive power of finitary automata and give optimal algorithms for classical decisions questions. We show that the finitary languages are Sigma 2-complete; we present a complete picture of the expressive power of various classes of automata with finitary and infinitary acceptance conditions; we show that the languages defined by finitary parity automata exactly characterize the star-free fragment of omega B-regular languages; and we show that emptiness

4 nodes3 linksoverview previewFinitary languages
4 nodes3 links
Finitary languages4 visible / 4 total nodes / 4 links
Co-authorshipAuthorshipAuthorshipTopic signalWFinitary languagespreprint / 2011AKrishnendu ChatterjeeResearcherANathanaël FijalkowResearcherTFormal Languages and Au...714 works
PaperSignal 103 links

Finitary languages

preprint / 2011

Open