Graph explorer

Decoherence without dissipation?

In a recent article, Ford, Lewis and O&#39;Connell (PRA 64, 032101 (2001)) discuss a thought experiment in which a Brownian particle is subjected to a double-slit measurement. Analyzing the decay of the emerging interference pattern, they derive a decoherence rate that is much faster than previous results and even persists in the limit of vanishing dissipation. This result is based on the definition of a certain attenuation factor, which they analyze for short times. In this note, we point out that this attenuation factor captures the physics of decoherence only for times larger than a certain time t_mix, which is the time it takes until the two emerging wave packets begin to overlap. Therefore, the strategy of Ford et al of extracting the decoherence time from the regime t < t_mix is in our opinion not meaningful. If one analyzes the attenuation factor for t > t_mix, one recovers familiar behaviour for the decoherence time; in particular, no decoherence is seen in the absence of dissipation. The latter conclusion is confirmed with a simple calculation of the off-diagonal elements of the reduced density matrix.

5 nodes4 linksoverview mapDecoherence without dissipation?
5 nodes4 links
Decoherence without dissipation?5 visible / 5 total nodes / 7 links
Co-authorshipCo-authorshipCo-authorshipAuthorshipAuthorshipAuthorshipTopic signalWDecoherence without dissipation?preprint / 2003ADominique GobertResearcherAJan von DelftResearcherAVinay AmbegaokarResearcherTquant-ph17817 works
PaperSignal 104 links

Decoherence without dissipation?

preprint / 2003

Open