BZPEERReading, trust and collaboration for research
Menu

Discover

GraphFollow connections around a paper, topic or saved view.

Workspaces

HomePick up where your research flow left off.InboxHandle requests, replies and notifications from one place.CollectionsCurate reading lists, evidence sets and shareable dossiers.ResearchSee your private provenance graph, trail and imports.CollaborationMove from discovery into focused discussion rooms.PublishDraft, preview and publish full-text research articles.

Network

ExpertsFind specialists worth following or asking for help.CommunitiesJoin research circles organized around shared work.PartnersSee external organizations active around the same topics.

Opportunities

ListingsBrowse roles, calls and collaborations with clearer fit signals.

Account

Log inReturn to your reading and collaboration workspace.Create accountStart saving work, following people and joining teams.
Log inCreate account

Researcher profile

Ziping Liu

Ziping Liu contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.

ResearcherAffiliation not importedOpen to collaborate
physics.med-pheess.IVArtificial IntelligenceComputer VisionMethodology

Trust snapshot

Quick read

Trust 17 - UnverifiedVerification L1Unclaimed author
4works
0followers
5topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Decide how to stay connected

Follow researcher0

Identity and collaboration

How to connect with this researcher

Claiming links this public author record to a researcher profile and unlocks direct collaboration workflows.

Log in to claim

Direct collaboration

Open a focused conversation when the fit is right

Claim this author entity first to unlock direct invitations.

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

4 published item(s)

preprint2022arXiv

A Bayesian approach to tissue-fraction estimation for oncological PET segmentation

Tumor segmentation in oncological PET is challenging, a major reason being the partial-volume effects that arise due to low system resolution and finite voxel size. The latter results in tissue-fraction effects, i.e. voxels contain a mixture of tissue classes. Conventional segmentation methods are typically designed to assign each voxel in the image as belonging to a certain tissue class. Thus, these methods are inherently limited in modeling tissue-fraction effects. To address the challenge of accounting for partial-volume effects, and in particular, tissue-fraction effects, we propose a Bayesian approach to tissue-fraction estimation for oncological PET segmentation. Specifically, this Bayesian approach estimates the posterior mean of fractional volume that the tumor occupies within each voxel of the image. The proposed method, implemented using a deep-learning-based technique, was first evaluated using clinically realistic 2-D simulation studies with known ground truth, in the context of segmenting the primary tumor in PET images of patients with lung cancer. The evaluation studies demonstrated that the method accurately estimated the tumor-fraction areas and significantly outperformed widely used conventional PET segmentation methods, including a U-net-based method, on the task of segmenting the tumor. In addition, the proposed method was relatively insensitive to partial-volume effects and yielded reliable tumor segmentation for different clinical-scanner configurations. The method was then evaluated using clinical images of patients with stage IIB/III non-small cell lung cancer from ACRIN 6668/RTOG 0235 multi-center clinical trial. Here, the results showed that the proposed method significantly outperformed all other considered methods and yielded accurate tumor segmentation on patient images with Dice similarity coefficient (DSC) of 0.82 (95 % CI: [0.78, 0.86]).

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2022arXiv

No-gold-standard evaluation of quantitative imaging methods in the presence of correlated noise

Objective evaluation of quantitative imaging (QI) methods with patient data is highly desirable, but is hindered by the lack or unreliability of an available gold standard. To address this issue, techniques that can evaluate QI methods without access to a gold standard are being actively developed. These techniques assume that the true and measured values are linearly related by a slope, bias, and Gaussian-distributed noise term, where the noise between measurements made by different methods is independent of each other. However, this noise arises in the process of measuring the same quantitative value, and thus can be correlated. To address this limitation, we propose a no-gold-standard evaluation (NGSE) technique that models this correlated noise by a multi-variate Gaussian distribution parameterized by a covariance matrix. We derive a maximum-likelihood-based approach to estimate the parameters that describe the relationship between the true and measured values, without any knowledge of the true values. We then use the estimated slopes and diagonal elements of the covariance matrix to compute the noise-to-slope ratio (NSR) to rank the QI methods on the basis of precision. The proposed NGSE technique was evaluated with multiple numerical experiments. Our results showed that the technique reliably estimated the NSR values and yielded accurate rankings of the considered methods for ~ 83% of 160 trials. In particular, the technique correctly identified the most precise method for ~ 97% of the trials. Overall, this study demonstrates the efficacy of the NGSE technique to accurately rank different QI methods when the correlated noise is present, and without access to any knowledge of the ground truth. The results motivate further validation of this technique with realistic simulation studies and patient data.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2021arXiv

Observer study-based evaluation of a stochastic and physics-based method to generate oncological PET images

Objective evaluation of new and improved methods for PET imaging requires access to images with ground truth, as can be obtained through simulation studies. However, for these studies to be clinically relevant, it is important that the simulated images are clinically realistic. In this study, we develop a stochastic and physics-based method to generate realistic oncological two-dimensional (2-D) PET images, where the ground-truth tumor properties are known. The developed method extends upon a previously proposed approach. The approach captures the observed variabilities in tumor properties from actual patient population. Further, we extend that approach to model intra-tumor heterogeneity using a lumpy object model. To quantitatively evaluate the clinical realism of the simulated images, we conducted a human-observer study. This was a two-alternative forced-choice (2AFC) study with trained readers (five PET physicians and one PET physicist). Our results showed that the readers had an average of ~ 50% accuracy in the 2AFC study. Further, the developed simulation method was able to generate wide varieties of clinically observed tumor types. These results provide evidence for the application of this method to 2-D PET imaging applications, and motivate development of this method to generate 3-D PET images.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2020arXiv

A no-gold-standard technique to objectively evaluate quantitative imaging methods using patient data: Theory

Objective evaluation of quantitative imaging (QI) methods using measurements directly obtained from patient images is highly desirable but hindered by the non-availability of gold standards. To address this issue, statistical techniques have been proposed to objectively evaluate QI methods without a gold standard. These techniques assume that the measured and true values are linearly related by a slope, bias, and normally distributed noise term, where it is assumed that the noise term between the different methods is independent. However, the noise could be correlated since it arises in the process of measuring the same true value. To address this issue, we propose a new no-gold-standard evaluation (NGSE) technique that models this noise as a multivariate normally distributed term, characterized by a covariance matrix. In this manuscript, we derive a maximum-likelihood-based technique that, without any knowledge of the true QI values, estimates the slope, bias, and covariance matrix terms. These are then used to rank the methods on the basis of precision of the measured QI values. Overall, the derivation demonstrates the mathematical premise behind the proposed NGSE technique.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access