BZPEERPapers, people, evidence and research paths
Menu

Discover

SearchFind papers, people, topics, institutions and opportunities from one place.GraphSee how papers, authors, topics and evidence connect.

Research tools

HomeContinue from the papers, people and topics that matter now.CollectionsTurn saved papers into reading lists, evidence maps and shareable context.ResearchReconstruct the path that led you from search to paper to question.CollaborationMove from a paper, topic or expert request into a focused thread.PublishCreate full-text research articles with metadata, formulas and versions.

Network

ExpertsFind specialists whose work and reviews explain why they can help.CommunitiesJoin research groups organized around papers, topics and shared evidence.

Opportunities

ListingsBrowse roles, calls and collaborations connected to real research context.

Account

Log inReturn to your saved papers, graph views and active threads.Create accountStart saving papers, building a research trail and joining teams.
Log inCreate account

Source author record

Ziba Assadi

Ziba Assadi appears in the imported research catalog. Authorship, coauthor and topic links are available while profile ownership is still unclaimed.

ResearcherUnclaimed source record
math.LOArtificial IntelligenceLogic in Computer Science

Catalog footprint

What is connected

3works
3topics
2close collaborators

Actions

Connect this record

Log in to claim
Open graphBrowse works

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent papers, topics, institutions and collaborators without losing the researcher page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

3 published item(s)

preprint2026arXiv

Fuzzy Representation of Norms

Autonomous systems (AS) powered by AI components are increasingly integrated into the fabric of our daily lives and society, raising concerns about their ethical and social impact. To be considered trustworthy, AS must adhere to ethical principles and values. This has led to significant research on the identification and incorporation of ethical requirements in AS system design. A recent development in this area is the introduction of SLEEC (Social, Legal, Ethical, Empathetic, and Cultural) rules, which provide a comprehensive framework for representing ethical and other normative considerations. This paper proposes a logical representation of SLEEC rules and presents a methodology to embed these ethical requirements using test-score semantics and fuzzy logic. The use of fuzzy logic is motivated by the view of ethics as a domain of possibilities, which allows the resolution of ethical dilemmas that AI systems may encounter. The proposed approach is illustrated through a case study.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2020arXiv

Decidability of the Multiplicative and Order Theory of Numbers

The ordered structures of natural, integer, rational and real numbers are studied in this thesis. The theories of these numbers in the language of order are decidable and finitely axiomatizable. Also, their theories in the language of order and addition are decidable and infinitely axiomatizable. For the language of order and multiplication, it is known that the theories of $\mathbb{N}$ and $\mathbb{Z}$ are not decidable (and so not axiomatizable by any computably enumerable set of sentences). By Tarski's theorem, the multiplicative ordered structure of $\mathbb{R}$ is decidable also. In this thesis we prove this result directly by quantifier elimination and present an explicit infinite axiomatization. The structure of $\mathbb{Q}$ in the language of order and multiplication seems to be missing in the literature. We show the decidability of its theory by the technique of quantifier elimination and after presenting an infinite axiomatization for this structure, we prove that it is not finitely axiomatizable.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2020arXiv

On the Truth of Gödelian and Rosserian Sentences

There is a longstanding debate in the logico-philosophical community as to why the Gödelian sentences of a consistent and sufficiently strong theory are true. The prevalent argument seems to be something like this: since every one of the Gödelian sentences of such a theory is equivalent to the theory's consistency statement, even provably so inside the theory, the truth of those sentences follows from the consistency of the theory in question. So, Gödelian sentences of consistent theories should be true. In this paper, we show that Gödelian sentences of only sound theories are true; and there is a long road from consistency to soundness, indeed a hierarchy of conditions which are satisfied by some theories and falsified by others. We also study the truth of Rosserian sentences and provide necessary and sufficient conditions for the truth of Rosserian (and also Gödelian) sentences of theories.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access