BZPEERReading, trust and collaboration for research
Menu

Discover

GraphFollow connections around a paper, topic or saved view.

Workspaces

HomePick up where your research flow left off.InboxHandle requests, replies and notifications from one place.CollectionsCurate reading lists, evidence sets and shareable dossiers.ResearchSee your private provenance graph, trail and imports.CollaborationMove from discovery into focused discussion rooms.PublishDraft, preview and publish full-text research articles.

Network

ExpertsFind specialists worth following or asking for help.CommunitiesJoin research circles organized around shared work.PartnersSee external organizations active around the same topics.

Opportunities

ListingsBrowse roles, calls and collaborations with clearer fit signals.

Account

Log inReturn to your reading and collaboration workspace.Create accountStart saving work, following people and joining teams.
Log inCreate account

Researcher profile

Zewei Lin

Zewei Lin contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.

ResearcherAffiliation not importedOpen to collaborate
econ.EMMethodologySoftware Engineering

Trust snapshot

Quick read

Trust 13 - UnverifiedVerification L1Unclaimed author
2works
0followers
3topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Decide how to stay connected

Follow researcher0

Identity and collaboration

How to connect with this researcher

Claiming links this public author record to a researcher profile and unlocks direct collaboration workflows.

Log in to claim

Direct collaboration

Open a focused conversation when the fit is right

Claim this author entity first to unlock direct invitations.

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

2 published item(s)

preprint2026arXiv

SSR: Safeguarding Staking Rewards by Defining and Detecting Logical Defects in DeFi Staking

Decentralized Finance (DeFi) staking is one of the most prominent applications within the DeFi ecosystem, where DeFi projects enable users to stake tokens on the platform and reward participants with additional tokens. However, logical defects in DeFi staking could enable attackers to claim unwarranted rewards by manipulating reward amounts, repeatedly claiming rewards, or engaging in other malicious actions. To mitigate these threats, we conducted the first study focused on defining and detecting logical defects in DeFi staking. Through the analysis of 64 security incidents and 144 audit reports, we identified six distinct types of logical defects, each accompanied by detailed descriptions and code examples. Building on this empirical research, we developed SSR (Safeguarding Staking Reward), a static analysis tool designed to detect logical defects in DeFi staking contracts. SSR utilizes a large language model (LLM) to extract fundamental information about staking logic and constructs a DeFi staking model. It then identifies logical defects by analyzing the model and the associated semantic features. We constructed a ground truth dataset based on known security incidents and audit reports to evaluate the effectiveness of SSR. The results indicate that SSR achieves an overall precision of 92.31%, a recall of 87.92%, and an F1-score of 88.85%. Additionally, to assess the prevalence of logical defects in real-world smart contracts, we compiled a large-scale dataset of 15,992 DeFi staking contracts. SSR detected that 3,557 (22.24%) of these contracts contained at least one logical defect.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2022arXiv

Model diagnostics of discrete data regression: a unifying framework using functional residuals

Model diagnostics is an indispensable component of regression analysis, yet it is not well addressed in standard textbooks on generalized linear models. The lack of exposition is attributed to the fact that when outcome data are discrete, classical methods (e.g., Pearson/deviance residual analysis and goodness-of-fit tests) have limited utility in model diagnostics and treatment. This paper establishes a novel framework for model diagnostics of discrete data regression. Unlike the literature defining a single-valued quantity as the residual, we propose to use a function as a vehicle to retain the residual information. In the presence of discreteness, we show that such a functional residual is appropriate for summarizing the residual randomness that cannot be captured by the structural part of the model. We establish its theoretical properties, which leads to the innovation of new diagnostic tools including the functional-residual-vs covariate plot and Function-to-Function (Fn-Fn) plot. Our numerical studies demonstrate that the use of these tools can reveal a variety of model misspecifications, such as not properly including a higher-order term, an explanatory variable, an interaction effect, a dispersion parameter, or a zero-inflation component. The functional residual yields, as a byproduct, Liu-Zhang's surrogate residual mainly developed for cumulative link models for ordinal data (Liu and Zhang, 2018, JASA). As a general notion, it considerably broadens the diagnostic scope as it applies to virtually all parametric models for binary, ordinal and count data, all in a unified diagnostic scheme.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access