Source author record

Zbigniew Błocki

Zbigniew Błocki appears in the imported research catalog. Authorship, coauthor and topic links are available while profile ownership is still unclaimed.

ResearcherUnclaimed source record

Catalog footprint

What is connected

2works
1topics
1close collaborators

Actions

Connect this record

Log in to claim

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

2 published item(s)

preprint2014arXiv

Estimates for the Bergman Kernel and the Multidimensional Suita Conjecture

We study the lower bound for the Bergman kernel in terms of volume of sublevel sets of the pluricomplex Green function. We show that it implies a bound in terms of volume of the Azukawa indicatrix which can be treated as a multidimensional version of the Suita conjecture. We also prove that the corresponding upper bound holds for convex domains and discuss it in bigger detail on some convex complex ellipsoids.

preprint2014arXiv

On the Suita conjecture for some convex ellipsoids in $\mathbb C^2$

It has been recently shown that for a convex domain $Ω$ in $\mathbb C^n$ and $w\inΩ$ the function $F_Ω(w):=\big(K_Ω(w)λ(I_Ω(w))\big)^{1/n}$, where $K_Ω$ is the Bergman kernel on the diagonal and $I_Ω(w)$ the Kobayashi indicatrix, satisfies $1\leq F_Ω\leq 4$. While the lower bound is optimal, not much more is known about the upper bound. In general it is quite difficult to compute $F_Ω$ even numerically and the highest value of it obtained so far is $1.010182\dots$ In this paper we present precise, although rather complicated formulas for the ellipsoids $Ω=\{|z_1|^{2m}+|z_2|^2<1\}$ (with $m\geq 1/2$) and all $w$, as well as for $Ω=\{|z_1|+|z_2|<1\}$ and $w$ on the diagonal. The Bergman kernel for those ellipsoids had been known, the main point is to compute the volume of the Kobayashi indicatrix. It turns out that in the second case the function $λ(I_Ω(w))$ is not $C^{3,1}$.