BZPEERPapers, people, evidence and research paths
Menu

Discover

SearchFind papers, people, topics, institutions and opportunities from one place.GraphSee how papers, authors, topics and evidence connect.

Research tools

HomeContinue from the papers, people and topics that matter now.CollectionsTurn saved papers into reading lists, evidence maps and shareable context.ResearchReconstruct the path that led you from search to paper to question.CollaborationMove from a paper, topic or expert request into a focused thread.PublishCreate full-text research articles with metadata, formulas and versions.

Network

ExpertsFind specialists whose work and reviews explain why they can help.CommunitiesJoin research groups organized around papers, topics and shared evidence.

Opportunities

ListingsBrowse roles, calls and collaborations connected to real research context.

Account

Log inReturn to your saved papers, graph views and active threads.Create accountStart saving papers, building a research trail and joining teams.
Log inCreate account

Source author record

Yves Tillé

Yves Tillé appears in the imported research catalog. Authorship, coauthor and topic links are available while profile ownership is still unclaimed.

ResearcherUnclaimed source record
Methodology

Catalog footprint

What is connected

7works
1topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Connect this record

Log in to claim
Open graphBrowse works

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent papers, topics, institutions and collaborators without losing the researcher page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

7 published item(s)

preprint2022arXiv

An Efficient Approach for Statistical Matching of Survey Data Trough Calibration, Optimal Transport and Balanced Sampling

Statistical matching aims to integrate two statistical sources. These sources can be two samples or a sample and the entire population. If two samples have been selected from the same population and information has been collected on different variables of interest, then it is interesting to match the two surveys to analyse, for example, contingency tables or covariances. In this paper, we propose an efficient method for matching two samples that may each contain a weighting scheme. The method matches the records of the two sources. Several variants are proposed in order to create a directly usable file integrating data from both information sources.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2022arXiv

Sequential Spatially Balanced Sampling

Sequential sampling occurs when the entire population is not known in advance and data are obtained one at a time or in groups of units. This manuscript proposes a new algorithm to sequentially select a balanced sample. The algorithm respects equal and unequal inclusion probabilities. The method can also be used to select a spatially balanced sample if the population of interest contains spatial coordinates. A simulation study is proposed and the results show that the proposed method outperforms other methods.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2021arXiv

Enhanced Cube Implementation For Highly Stratified Population

A balanced sampling design should always be the adopted strategies if auxiliary information is available. Besides, integrating a stratified structure of the population in the sampling process can considerably reduce the variance of the estimators. We propose here a new method to handle the selection of a balanced sample in a highly stratified population. The method improves substantially the commonly used sampling design and reduces the time-consuming problem that could arise if inclusion probabilities within strata do not sum to an integer.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2020arXiv

Spatial Spread Sampling Using Weakly Associated Vectors

Geographical data are generally autocorrelated. In this case, it is preferable to select spread units. In this paper, we propose a new method for selecting well-spread samples from a finite spatial population with equal or unequal inclusion probabilities. The proposed method is based on the definition of a spatial structure by using a stratification matrix. Our method exactly satisfies given inclusion probabilities and provides samples that are very well-spread. A set of simulations shows that our method outperforms other existing methods such as the Generalized Random Tessellation Stratified (GRTS) or the Local Pivotal Method (LPM). Analysis of the variance on a real dataset shows that our method is more accurate than these two. Furthermore, a variance estimator is proposed.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2016arXiv

Probability Sampling Designs: Principles for Choice of Design and Balancing

The aim of this paper is twofold. First, three theoretical principles are formalized: randomization, overrepresentation and restriction. We develop these principles and give a rationale for their use in choosing the sampling design in a systematic way. In the model-assisted framework, knowledge of the population is formalized by modelling the population and the sampling design is chosen accordingly. We show how the principles of overrepresentation and of restriction naturally arise from the modelling of the population. The balanced sampling then appears as a consequence of the modelling. Second, a review of probability balanced sampling is presented through the model-assisted framework. For some basic models, balanced sampling can be shown to be an optimal sampling design. Emphasis is placed on new spatial sampling methods and their related models. An illustrative example shows the advantages of the different methods. Throughout the paper, various examples illustrate how the three principles can be applied in order to improve inference.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2016arXiv

Quasi-Systematic Sampling From a Continuous Population

A specific family of point processes are introduced that allow to select samples for the purpose of estimating the mean or the integral of a function of a real variable. These processes, called quasi-systematic processes, depend on a tuning parameter $r>0$ that permits to control the likeliness of jointly selecting neighbor units in a same sample. When $r$ is large, units that are close tend to not be selected together and samples are well spread. When $r$ tends to infinity, the sampling design is close to systematic sampling. For all $r > 0$, the first and second-order unit inclusion densities are positive, allowing for unbiased estimators of variance. Algorithms to generate these sampling processes for any positive real value of $r$ are presented. When $r$ is large, the estimator of variance is unstable. It follows that $r$ must be chosen by the practitioner as a trade-off between an accurate estimation of the target parameter and an accurate estimation of the variance of the parameter estimator. The method's advantages are illustrated with a set of simulations.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2015arXiv

Balanced $k$-nearest neighbor imputation

In order to overcome the problem of item nonresponse, random imputation methods are often used because they tend to preserve the distribution of the imputed variable. Among the random imputation methods, the random hot-deck has the interesting property of imputing observed values. A new random hot-deck imputation method is proposed. The key innovation of this method is that the selection of donors is viewed as a sampling problem and uses calibration and balanced sampling. This approach makes it possible to select donors such that if the auxiliary variables were imputed, their estimated totals would not change. As a consequence, very accurate and stable totals estimations can be obtained. Moreover, the method is based on a nonparametric procedure. Donors are selected in neighborhoods of recipients. In this way, the missing value of a recipient is replaced with an observed value of a similar unit. This new approach is very flexible and can greatly improve the quality of estimations. Also, this method is unbiased under very different models and is thus resistant to model misspecification. Finally, the new method makes it possible to introduce edit rules while imputing.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access