BZPEERReading, trust and collaboration for research
Menu

Discover

GraphFollow connections around a paper, topic or saved view.

Workspaces

HomePick up where your research flow left off.InboxHandle requests, replies and notifications from one place.CollectionsCurate reading lists, evidence sets and shareable dossiers.ResearchSee your private provenance graph, trail and imports.CollaborationMove from discovery into focused discussion rooms.PublishDraft, preview and publish full-text research articles.

Network

ExpertsFind specialists worth following or asking for help.CommunitiesJoin research circles organized around shared work.PartnersSee external organizations active around the same topics.

Opportunities

ListingsBrowse roles, calls and collaborations with clearer fit signals.

Account

Log inReturn to your reading and collaboration workspace.Create accountStart saving work, following people and joining teams.
Log inCreate account

Researcher profile

Yunhao Liang

Yunhao Liang contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.

ResearcherAffiliation not importedOpen to collaborate
eess.ASSoundComputation and LanguageComputer Vision

Trust snapshot

Quick read

Trust 15 - UnverifiedVerification L1Unclaimed author
3works
0followers
4topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Decide how to stay connected

Follow researcher0

Identity and collaboration

How to connect with this researcher

Claiming links this public author record to a researcher profile and unlocks direct collaboration workflows.

Log in to claim

Direct collaboration

Open a focused conversation when the fit is right

Claim this author entity first to unlock direct invitations.

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

3 published item(s)

preprint2026arXiv

Visual Merit or Linguistic Crutch? A Close Look at DeepSeek-OCR

DeepSeek-OCR utilizes an optical 2D mapping approach to achieve high-ratio vision-text compression, claiming to decode text tokens exceeding ten times the input visual tokens. While this suggests a promising solution for the LLM long-context bottleneck, we investigate a critical question: "Visual merit or linguistic crutch - which drives DeepSeek-OCR's performance?" By employing sentence-level and word-level semantic corruption, we isolate the model's intrinsic OCR capabilities from its language priors. Results demonstrate that without linguistic support, DeepSeek-OCR's performance plummets from approximately 90% to 20%. Comparative benchmarking against 13 baseline models reveals that traditional pipeline OCR methods exhibit significantly higher robustness to such semantic perturbations than end-to-end methods. Furthermore, we find that lower visual token counts correlate with increased reliance on priors, exacerbating hallucination risks. Context stress testing also reveals a total model collapse around 10,000 text tokens, suggesting that current optical compression techniques may paradoxically aggravate the long-context bottleneck. This study empirically defines DeepSeek-OCR's capability boundaries and offers essential insights for future optimizations of the vision-text compression paradigm. We release all data, results and scripts used in this study at https://github.com/dududuck00/DeepSeekOCR.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2022arXiv

Joint framework with deep feature distillation and adaptive focal loss for weakly supervised audio tagging and acoustic event detection

A good joint training framework is very helpful to improve the performances of weakly supervised audio tagging (AT) and acoustic event detection (AED) simultaneously. In this study, we propose three methods to improve the best teacher-student framework in the IEEE AASP Challenge on Detection and Classification of Acoustic Scenes and Events (DCASE) 2019 Task 4 for both audio tagging and acoustic events detection tasks. A frame-level target-events based deep feature distillation is first proposed, which aims to leverage the potential of limited strong-labeled data in weakly supervised framework to learn better intermediate feature maps. Then, we propose an adaptive focal loss and two-stage training strategy to enable an effective and more accurate model training, where the contribution of hard and easy acoustic events to the total cost function can be automatically adjusted. Furthermore, an event-specific post processing is designed to improve the prediction of target event time-stamps. Our experiments are performed on the public DCASE 2019 Task 4 dataset, results show that our approach achieves competitive performances in both AT (81.2\% F1-score) and AED (49.8\% F1-score) tasks.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2022arXiv

Selective Pseudo-labeling and Class-wise Discriminative Fusion for Sound Event Detection

In recent years, exploring effective sound separation (SSep) techniques to improve overlapping sound event detection (SED) attracts more and more attention. Creating accurate separation signals to avoid the catastrophic error accumulation during SED model training is very important and challenging. In this study, we first propose a novel selective pseudo-labeling approach, termed SPL, to produce high confidence separated target events from blind sound separation outputs. These target events are then used to fine-tune the original SED model that pre-trained on the sound mixtures in a multi-objective learning style. Then, to further leverage the SSep outputs, a class-wise discriminative fusion is proposed to improve the final SED performances, by combining multiple frame-level event predictions of both sound mixtures and their separated signals. All experiments are performed on the public DCASE 2021 Task 4 dataset, and results show that our approaches significantly outperforms the official baseline, the collar-based F 1, PSDS1 and PSDS2 performances are improved from 44.3%, 37.3% and 54.9% to 46.5%, 44.5% and 75.4%, respectively.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access