Researcher profile

Yujian Kang

Yujian Kang contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.

ResearcherAffiliation not importedOpen to collaborate

Trust snapshot

Quick read

Trust 13 - UnverifiedVerification L1Unclaimed author
2works
0followers
1topics
2close collaborators

Actions

Decide how to stay connected

Follow researcher0

Identity and collaboration

How to connect with this researcher

Claiming links this public author record to a researcher profile and unlocks direct collaboration workflows.

Log in to claim

Direct collaboration

Open a focused conversation when the fit is right

Claim this author entity first to unlock direct invitations.

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

2 published item(s)

preprint2022arXiv

A Two-phase Recommendation Framework for Consistent Java Method Names

In software engineering (SE) tasks, the naming approach is so important that it attracts many scholars from all over the world to study how to improve the quality of method names. To accurately recommend method names, we employ a novel framework to handle this problem. In our expeirments, nearly 8 million Java methods are collected from open source organizations as our evaluation dataset. In the first-phase recommendation, we introduce a fast and simple classifier based on the fast text neural network for reccomending potential method category. In the second-phase recomendation, we employ both two Long Short Term Memory Networks to reccomend consitent method names from each classification. Evaluation results prove that the proposed approach significantly outperforms state-of-the-art approach.

preprint2022arXiv

An empirical study on Java method name suggestion: are we there yet?

A large-scale evaluation for current naming approaches substantiates that such approaches are accurate. However, it is less known about which categories of method names work well via such naming approaches and how's the performance of naming approaches. To point out the superiority of the current naming approach, in this paper, we conduct an empirical study on such approaches in a new dataset. Moreover, we analyze the successful naming approaches above and find that: (1) around 60% of the accepted recommendation names are made on prefixes within get, set, is, and test. (2) A large portion (19.3%) of method names successfully recommended could be derived from the given method bodies. The comparisons also demonstrate the superior performance of the empirical study.