Source author record

Yuichiro Nakada

Yuichiro Nakada appears in the imported research catalog. Authorship, coauthor and topic links are available while profile ownership is still unclaimed.

ResearcherUnclaimed source record

Catalog footprint

What is connected

1works
1topics
1close collaborators

Actions

Connect this record

Log in to claim

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent papers, topics, institutions and collaborators without losing the researcher page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

1 published item(s)

preprint2010arXiv

The shape of emergent quantum geometry from an N=4 SYM minisuperspace approximation

We study numerically various wave functions in a gauged matrix quantum mechanics of six commuting hermitian $N\times N$ matrices. Our simulations span ranges of $N$ up to 10000. This system is a truncated and quenched version of N=4 SYM that serves as a minisuperspace approximation to the full ${\cal N}=4$ SYM system. This setup encodes aspects of the geometry of the AdS dual in terms of joint eigenvalue distributions for the matrices in the large $N$ limit. We analyze the problem of determining geometric measurements from these fluctuating distributions at finite $N$ and how fast they approach to the large N limit. We treat this eigenvalue geometry information as a proxy for geometric calculations in quantum gravity in a description where gravity is an emergent phenomenon. Our results show that care is needed in choosing the observables that measure the geometry: different choices of observables give different answers, have different size fluctuations at finite $N$ and they converge at different rates to the large $N$ limit. We find that some natural choices of observables are pathological at finite $N$ for $N$ sufficiently small. Finally, we note that the approach to the large $N$ limit does not seem to follow the expected convergence in powers of $1/N^2$ from planar diagram arguments. Our evidence suggests that different powers of $N$ appear, but convergence to large $N$ is rather slow so the values of $N$ we have explored might be too small to conclude this unambiguously.