Source author record

Yueh-En Liu

Yueh-En Liu appears in the imported research catalog. Authorship, coauthor and topic links are available while profile ownership is still unclaimed.

ResearcherUnclaimed source record

Catalog footprint

What is connected

1works
3topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Connect this record

Log in to claim

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent papers, topics, institutions and collaborators without losing the researcher page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

1 published item(s)

preprint2022arXiv

Segmentation and Risk Score Prediction of Head and Neck Cancers in PET/CT Volumes with 3D U-Net and Cox Proportional Hazard Neural Networks

We utilized a 3D nnU-Net model with residual layers supplemented by squeeze and excitation (SE) normalization for tumor segmentation from PET/CT images provided by the Head and Neck Tumor segmentation chal-lenge (HECKTOR). Our proposed loss function incorporates the Unified Fo-cal and Mumford-Shah losses to take the advantage of distribution, region, and boundary-based loss functions. The results of leave-one-out-center-cross-validation performed on different centers showed a segmentation performance of 0.82 average Dice score (DSC) and 3.16 median Hausdorff Distance (HD), and our results on the test set achieved 0.77 DSC and 3.01 HD. Following lesion segmentation, we proposed training a case-control proportional hazard Cox model with an MLP neural net backbone to predict the hazard risk score for each discrete lesion. This hazard risk prediction model (CoxCC) was to be trained on a number of PET/CT radiomic features extracted from the segmented lesions, patient and lesion demographics, and encoder features provided from the penultimate layer of a multi-input 2D PET/CT convolutional neural network tasked with predicting time-to-event for each lesion. A 10-fold cross-validated CoxCC model resulted in a c-index validation score of 0.89, and a c-index score of 0.61 on the HECKTOR challenge test dataset.