BZPEERReading, trust and collaboration for research
Menu

Discover

GraphFollow connections around a paper, topic or saved view.

Workspaces

HomePick up where your research flow left off.InboxHandle requests, replies and notifications from one place.CollectionsCurate reading lists, evidence sets and shareable dossiers.ResearchSee your private provenance graph, trail and imports.CollaborationMove from discovery into focused discussion rooms.PublishDraft, preview and publish full-text research articles.

Network

ExpertsFind specialists worth following or asking for help.CommunitiesJoin research circles organized around shared work.PartnersSee external organizations active around the same topics.

Opportunities

ListingsBrowse roles, calls and collaborations with clearer fit signals.

Account

Log inReturn to your reading and collaboration workspace.Create accountStart saving work, following people and joining teams.
Log inCreate account

Researcher profile

Yue You

Yue You contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.

ResearcherAffiliation not importedOpen to collaborate
Human-Computer InteractionApplicationsComputation and LanguageInformation Retrieval

Trust snapshot

Quick read

Trust 17 - UnverifiedVerification L1Unclaimed author
4works
0followers
4topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Decide how to stay connected

Follow researcher0

Identity and collaboration

How to connect with this researcher

Claiming links this public author record to a researcher profile and unlocks direct collaboration workflows.

Log in to claim

Direct collaboration

Open a focused conversation when the fit is right

Claim this author entity first to unlock direct invitations.

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

4 published item(s)

preprint2022arXiv

User Experience of Symptom Checkers: A Systematic Review

This review reports the user experience of symptom checkers, aiming to characterize users studied in the existing literature, identify the aspects of user experience of symptom checkers that have been studied, and offer design suggestions. Our literature search resulted in 31 publications. We found that (1) most symptom checker users are relatively young; (2) eight relevant aspects of user experience have been explored, including motivation, trust, acceptability, satisfaction, accuracy, usability, safety or security, and functionality; (3) future symptom checkers should improve their accuracy, safety, and usability.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2021arXiv

Self-Diagnosis through AI-enabled Chatbot-based Symptom Checkers: User Experiences and Design Considerations

Recently, there has been a growing interest in developing AI-enabled chatbot-based symptom checker (CSC) apps in the healthcare market. CSC apps provide potential diagnoses for users and assist them with self-triaging based on Artificial Intelligence (AI) techniques using human-like conversations. Despite the popularity of such CSC apps, little research has been done to investigate their functionalities and user experiences. To do so, we conducted a feature review, a user review analysis, and an interview study. We found that the existing CSC apps lack the functions to support the whole diagnostic process of an offline medical visit. We also found that users perceive the current CSC apps to lack support for a comprehensive medical history, flexible symptom input, comprehensible questions, and diverse diseases and user groups. Based on these results, we derived implications for the future features and conversational design of CSC apps.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2021arXiv

The Medical Authority of AI: A Study of AI-enabled Consumer-facing Health Technology

Recently, consumer-facing health technologies such as Artificial Intelligence (AI)-based symptom checkers (AISCs) have sprung up in everyday healthcare practice. AISCs solicit symptom information from users and provide medical suggestions and possible diagnoses, a responsibility that people usually entrust with real-person authorities such as physicians and expert patients. Thus, the advent of AISCs begs a question of whether and how they transform the notion of medical authority in everyday healthcare practice. To answer this question, we conducted an interview study with thirty AISC users. We found that users assess the medical authority of AISCs using various factors including automated decisions and interaction design patterns of AISC apps, associations with established medical authorities like hospitals, and comparisons with other health technologies. We reveal how AISCs are used in healthcare delivery, discuss how AI transforms conventional understandings of medical authority, and derive implications for designing AI-enabled health technology.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2020arXiv

Machine-learning classifiers for logographic name matching in public health applications: approaches for incorporating phonetic, visual, and keystroke similarity in large-scale probabilistic record linkage

Approximate string-matching methods to account for complex variation in highly discriminatory text fields, such as personal names, can enhance probabilistic record linkage. However, discriminating between matching and non-matching strings is challenging for logographic scripts, where similarities in pronunciation, appearance, or keystroke sequence are not directly encoded in the string data. We leverage a large Chinese administrative dataset with known match status to develop logistic regression and Xgboost classifiers integrating measures of visual, phonetic, and keystroke similarity to enhance identification of potentially-matching name pairs. We evaluate three methods of leveraging name similarity scores in large-scale probabilistic record linkage, which can adapt to varying match prevalence and information in supporting fields: (1) setting a threshold score based on predicted quality of name-matching across all record pairs; (2) setting a threshold score based on predicted discriminatory power of the linkage model; and (3) using empirical score distributions among matches and nonmatches to perform Bayesian adjustment of matching probabilities estimated from exact-agreement linkage. In experiments on holdout data, as well as data simulated with varying name error rates and supporting fields, a logistic regression classifier incorporated via the Bayesian method demonstrated marked improvements over exact-agreement linkage with respect to discriminatory power, match probability estimation, and accuracy, reducing the total number of misclassified record pairs by 21% in test data and up to an average of 93% in simulated datasets. Our results demonstrate the value of incorporating visual, phonetic, and keystroke similarity for logographic name matching, as well as the promise of our Bayesian approach to leverage name-matching within large-scale record linkage.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access