BZPEERReading, trust and collaboration for research
Menu

Discover

GraphFollow connections around a paper, topic or saved view.

Workspaces

HomePick up where your research flow left off.InboxHandle requests, replies and notifications from one place.CollectionsCurate reading lists, evidence sets and shareable dossiers.ResearchSee your private provenance graph, trail and imports.CollaborationMove from discovery into focused discussion rooms.PublishDraft, preview and publish full-text research articles.

Network

ExpertsFind specialists worth following or asking for help.CommunitiesJoin research circles organized around shared work.PartnersSee external organizations active around the same topics.

Opportunities

ListingsBrowse roles, calls and collaborations with clearer fit signals.

Account

Log inReturn to your reading and collaboration workspace.Create accountStart saving work, following people and joining teams.
Log inCreate account

Researcher profile

Yoshiyuki Ninomiya

Yoshiyuki Ninomiya contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.

ResearcherAffiliation not importedOpen to collaborate
Methodology

Trust snapshot

Quick read

Trust 21 - Emerging
8works
0followers
1topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Decide how to stay connected

Follow researcher0

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

8 published item(s)

preprint2022arXiv

Information criteria for detecting change-points in the Cox proportional hazards model

The Cox proportional hazards model, commonly used in clinical trials, assumes proportional hazards. However, it does not hold when, for example, there is a delayed onset of the treatment effect. In such a situation, an acute change in the hazard ratio function is expected to exist. This paper considers the Cox model with change-points and derives AIC-type information criteria for detecting those change-points. The change-point model does not allow for conventional statistical asymptotics due to its irregularity, thus a formal AIC that penalizes twice the number of parameters would not be analytically derived, and using it would clearly give overfitting analysis results. Therefore, we will construct specific asymptotics using the partial likelihood estimation method in the Cox model with change-points. Based on the original derivation method for AIC, we propose information criteria that are mathematically guaranteed. If the partial likelihood is used in the estimation, information criteria with penalties much larger than twice the number of parameters could be obtained in an explicit form. Numerical experiments confirm that the proposed criterion is clearly superior in terms of the original purpose of AIC, which is to provide an estimate that is close to the true structure. We also apply the proposed criterion to actual clinical trial data to indicate that it will easily lead to different results from the formal AIC.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2022arXiv

Information criteria for sparse methods in causal inference

For propensity score analysis and sparse estimation, we develop an information criterion for determining the regularization parameters needed in variable selection. First, for Gaussian distribution-based causal inference models, we extend Stein's unbiased risk estimation theory, which leads to a generalized Cp criterion that has almost no weakness in conventional sparse estimation, and derive an inverse-probability-weighted sparse estimation version of the criterion without resorting to asymptotics. Next, for general causal inference models that are not necessarily Gaussian distribution-based, we extend the asymptotic theory on LASSO for propensity score analysis, with the intention of implementing doubly robust sparse estimation. From the asymptotic theory, an AIC-type information criterion for inverse-probability-weighted sparse estimation is given, and then a criterion with double robustness in itself is derived for doubly robust sparse estimation. Numerical experiments compare the proposed criterion with the existing criterion derived from a formal argument and verify that the proposed criterion is superior in almost all cases, that the difference is not negligible in many cases, and that the results of variable selection differ significantly. Real data analysis confirms that the difference between variable selection and estimation by these criteria is actually large. Finally, generalizations to general sparse estimation using group LASSO, elastic net, and non-convex regularization are made in order to indicate that the proposed criterion is highly extensible.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2022arXiv

Prior Intensified Information Criterion

The widely applicable information criterion (WAIC) has been used as a model selection criterion for Bayesian statistics in recent years. It is an asymptotically unbiased estimator of the Kullback-Leibler divergence between a Bayesian predictive distribution and the true distribution. Not only is the WAIC theoretically more sound than other information criteria, its usefulness in practice has also been reported. On the other hand, the WAIC is intended for settings in which the prior distribution does not have an asymptotic influence, and as we set the class of the prior distribution to be more complex, it never fails to select the most complex one. To alleviate these concerns, this paper proposed the prior intensified information criterion (PIIC). In addition, it customizes this criterion to incorporate sparse estimation and causal inference. Numerical experiments show that the PIIC clearly outperforms the WAIC in terms of prediction performance when the above concerns are manifested. A real data analysis confirms that the results of variable selection and Bayesian estimators of the WAIC and PIIC differ significantly.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2021arXiv

Smoothly varying ridge regularization

A basis expansion with regularization methods is much appealing to the flexible or robust nonlinear regression models for data with complex structures. When the underlying function has inhomogeneous smoothness, it is well known that conventional reguralization methods do not perform well. In this case, an adaptive procedure such as a free-knot spline or a local likelihood method is often introduced as an effective method. However, both methods need intensive computational loads. In this study, we consider a new efficient basis expansion by proposing a smoothly varying regularization method which is constructed by some special penalties. We call them adaptive-type penalties. In our modeling, adaptive-type penalties play key rolls and it has been successful in giving good estimation for inhomogeneous smoothness functions. A crucial issue in the modeling process is the choice of a suitable model among candidates. To select the suitable model, we derive an approximated generalized information criterion (GIC). The proposed method is investigated through Monte Carlo simulations and real data analysis. Numerical results suggest that our method performs well in various situations.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2016arXiv

$C_p$ criterion for semiparametric approach in causal inference

For marginal structural models, which recently play an important role in causal inference, we consider a model selection problem in the framework of a semiparametric approach using inverse-probability-weighted estimation or doubly robust estimation. In this framework, the modeling target is a potential outcome which may be a missing value, and so we cannot apply the AIC nor its extended version to this problem. In other words, there is no analytical information criterion obtained according to its classical derivation for this problem. Hence, we define a mean squared error appropriate for treating the potential outcome, and then we derive its asymptotic unbiased estimator as a $C_{p}$ criterion from an asymptotics for the semiparametric approach and using an ignorable treatment assignment condition. In simulation study, it is shown that the proposed criterion exceeds a conventionally derived existing criterion in the squared error and model selection frequency. Specifically, in all simulation settings, the proposed criterion provides clearly smaller squared errors and higher frequencies selecting the true or nearly true model. Moreover, in real data analysis, we check that there is a clear difference between the selections by the two criteria.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2016arXiv

On the Consistency of the Bias Correction Term of the AIC for the Non-Concave Penalized Likelihood Method

Penalized likelihood methods with an $\ell_γ$-type penalty, such as the Bridge, the SCAD, and the MCP, allow us to estimate a parameter and to do variable selection, simultaneously, if $γ\in (0,1]$. In this method, it is important to choose a tuning parameter which controls the penalty level, since we can select the model as we want when we choose it arbitrarily. Nowadays, several information criteria have been developed to choose the tuning parameter without such an arbitrariness. However the bias correction term of such information criteria depend on the true parameter value in general, then we usually plug-in a consistent estimator of it to compute the information criteria from the data. In this paper, we derive a consistent estimator of the bias correction term of the AIC for the non-concave penalized likelihood method and propose a simple AIC-type information criterion for such models.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2016arXiv

Use of spurious correlation for multiplicity adjustment

We consider one of the most basic multiple testing problems that compares expectations of multivariate data among several groups. As a test statistic, a conventional (approximate) $t$-statistic is considered, and we determine its rejection region using a common rejection limit. When there are unknown correlations among test statistics, the multiplicity adjusted $p$-values are dependent on the unknown correlations. They are usually replaced with their estimates that are always consistent under any hypothesis. In this paper, we propose the use of estimates, which are not necessarily consistent and are referred to as spurious correlations, in order to improve statistical power. Through simulation studies, we verify that the proposed method asymptotically controls the family-wise error rate and clearly provides higher statistical power than existing methods. In addition, the proposed and existing methods are applied to a real multiple testing problem that compares quantitative traits among groups of mice and the results are compared.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2015arXiv

AIC for Non-concave Penalized Likelihood Method

Non-concave penalized maximum likelihood methods, such as the Bridge, the SCAD, and the MCP, are widely used because they not only do parameter estimation and variable selection simultaneously but also have a high efficiency as compared to the Lasso. They include a tuning parameter which controls a penalty level, and several information criteria have been developed for selecting it. While these criteria assure the model selection consistency and so have a high value, it is a severe problem that there are no appropriate rules to choose the one from a class of information criteria satisfying such a preferred asymptotic property. In this paper, we derive an information criterion based on the original definition of the AIC by considering the minimization of the prediction error rather than the model selection consistency. Concretely speaking, we derive a function of the score statistic which is asymptotically equivalent to the non-concave penalized maximum likelihood estimator, and then we provide an asymptotically unbiased estimator of the Kullback-Leibler divergence between the true distribution and the estimated distribution based on the function. Furthermore, through simulation studies, we check that the performance of the proposed information criterion gives almost the same as or better than that of the cross-validation.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access