Source author record

Yosef Rinott

Yosef Rinott appears in the imported research catalog. Authorship, coauthor and topic links are available while profile ownership is still unclaimed.

ResearcherUnclaimed source record

math.ST Statistics Theory math.PR math.CO Methodology

Catalog footprint

What is connected

6works

5topics

4close collaborators

Actions

Connect this record

Open graph Browse works

Inspect adjacent papers, topics, institutions and collaborators without losing the researcher page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

preprint2022arXiv

On Tournaments and Negative Dependence

Negative dependence of sequences of random variables is often an interesting characteristic of their distribution, as well as a useful tool for studying various asymptotic results, including central limit theorems, Poisson approximations, the rate of increase of the maximum, and more. In the study of probability models of tournaments, negative dependence of participants' outcomes arises naturally with application to various asymptotic results. In particular, the property of negative orthant dependence was proved in several articles for different tournament models, with a special proof for each model. In this note we unify these results by proving a stronger property, negative association, a generalization leading to a very simple proof. We also present a natural example of a knockout tournament where the scores are negatively orthant dependent but not negatively associated. The proof requires a new result on a preservation property of negative orthant dependence that is of independent interest.

preprint2022arXiv

Optimal designs for the development of personalized treatment rules

We study the design of multi-armed parallel group clinical trials to estimate personalized treatment rules that identify the best treatment for a given patient with given covariates. Assuming that the outcomes in each treatment arm are given by a homoscedastic linear model, with possibly different variances between treatment arms, and that the trial subjects form a random sample from an unselected overall population, we optimize the (possibly randomized) treatment allocation allowing the allocation rates to depend on the covariates. We find that, for the case of two treatments, the approximately optimal allocation rule does not depend on the value of the covariates but only on the variances of the responses. In contrast, for the case of three treatments or more, the optimal treatment allocation does depend on the values of the covariates as well as the true regression coefficients. The methods are illustrated with a recently published dietary clinical trial.

preprint2015arXiv

Functional van den Berg-Kesten-Reimer Inequalities and their Duals, with Applications

The BKR inequality conjectured by van den Berg and Kesten in [11], and proved by Reimer in [8], states that for $A$ and $B$ events on $S$, a finite product of finite sets $S_i,i=1,\ldots,n$, and $P$ any product measure on $S$, $$ P(A \Box B) \le P(A)P(B),$$ where the set $A \Box B$ consists of the elementary events which lie in both $A$ and $B$ for `disjoint reasons.' Precisely, with ${\bf n}:=\{1,\ldots,n\}$ and $K \subset {\bf n}$, for ${\bf x} \in S$ letting $[{\bf x}]_K=\{{\bf y} \in S: y_i = x_i, i \in K\}$, the set $A \Box B$ consists of all ${\bf x} \in S$ for which there exist disjoint subsets $K$ and $L$ of ${\bf n}$ for which $[{\bf x}]_K \subset A$ and $[{\bf x}]_L \subset B$. The BKR inequality is extended to the following functional version on a general finite product measure space $(S,\mathbb{S})$ with product probability measure $P$, $$E\left\{ \max_{\stackrel{K \cap L = \emptyset}{K \subset {\bf n}, L \subset {\bf n}}} \underline{f}_K({\bf X})\underline{g}_L({\bf X})\right\} \leq E\left\{f({\bf X})\right\}\,E\left\{g({\bf X})\right\},$$ where $f$ and $g$ are non-negative measurable functions, $\underline{f}_K({\bf x}) = {\rm ess} \inf_{{\bf y} \in [{\bf x}]_K}f({\bf y})$ and $\underline{g}_L({\bf x}) = {\rm ess} \inf_{{\bf y} \in [{\bf x}]_L}g({\bf y}).$ The original BKR inequality is recovered by taking $f({\bf x})={\bf 1}_A({\bf x})$ and $g({\bf x})={\bf 1}_B({\bf x})$, and applying the fact that in general ${\bf 1}_{A \Box B} \le \max_{K \cap L = \emptyset} \underline{f}_K({\bf x}) \underline{g}_L({\bf x})$. Related formulations, and functional versions of the dual inequality on events by Kahn, Saks, and Smyth [6], are also considered. Applications include order statistics, assignment problems, and paths in random graphs.

preprint2011arXiv

Are adaptive allocation designs beneficial for improving power in binary response trials?

We consider the classical problem of selecting the best of two treatments in clinical trials with binary response. The target is to find the design that maximizes the power of the relevant test. Many papers use a normal approximation to the power function and claim that Neyman allocation that assigns subjects to treatment groups according to the ratio of the responses' standard deviations, should be used. As the standard deviations are unknown, an adaptive design is often recommended. The asymptotic justification of this approach is arguable, since it uses the normal approximation in tails where the error in the approximation is larger than the estimated quantity. We consider two different approaches for optimality of designs that are related to Pitman and Bahadur definitions of relative efficiency of tests. We prove that the optimal allocation according to the Pitman criterion is the balanced allocation and that the optimal allocation according to the Bahadur approach depends on the unknown parameters. Exact calculations reveal that the optimal allocation according to Bahadur is often close to the balanced design, and the powers of both are comparable to the Neyman allocation for small sample sizes and are generally better for large experiments. Our findings have important implications to the design of experiments, as the balanced design is proved to be optimal or close to optimal and the need for the complications involved in following an adaptive design for the purpose of increasing the power of tests is therefore questionable.

preprint2011arXiv

On Optimal Allocation of a Continuous Resource Using an Iterative Approach and Total Positivity

We study a class of optimal allocation problems, including the well-known Bomber Problem, with the following common probabilistic structure. An aircraft equipped with an amount~$x$ of ammunition is intercepted by enemy airplanes arriving according to a homogenous Poisson process over a fixed time duration~$t$. Upon encountering an enemy, the aircraft has the choice of spending any amount~$0\le y\le x$ of its ammunition, resulting in the aircraft's survival with probability equal to some known increasing function of $y$. Two different goals have been considered in the literature concerning the optimal amount~$K(x,t)$ of ammunition spent: (i)~Maximizing the probability of surviving for time~$t$, which is the so-called Bomber Problem, and (ii) maximizing the number of enemy airplanes shot down during time~$t$, which we call the Fighter Problem. Several authors have attempted to settle the following conjectures about the monotonicity of $K(x,t)$: [A] $K(x,t)$ is decreasing in $t$, [B] $K(x,t)$ is increasing in $x$, and [C] the amount~$x-K(x,t)$ held back is increasing in $x$. [A] and [C] have been shown for the Bomber Problem with discrete ammunition, while [B] is still an open question. In this paper we consider both time and ammunition continuous, and for the Bomber Problem prove [A] and [C], while for the Fighter we prove [A] and [C] for one special case and [B] and [C] for another. These proofs involve showing that the optimal survival probability and optimal number shot down are totally positive of order 2 ($\mbox{TP}_2$) in the Bomber and Fighter Problems, respectively. The $\mbox{TP}_2$ property is shown by constructing convergent sequences of approximating functions through an iterative operation which preserves $\mbox{TP}_2$ and other properties.

preprint2009arXiv

Prediction of Ordered Random Effects in a Simple Small Area Model

Prediction of a vector of ordered parameters or part of it arises naturally in the context of Small Area Estimation (SAE). For example, one may want to estimate the parameters associated with the top ten areas, the best or worst area, or a certain percentile. We use a simple SAE model to show that estimation of ordered parameters by the corresponding ordered estimates of each area separately does not yield good results with respect to MSE. Shrinkage-type predictors, with an appropriate amount of shrinkage for the particular problem of ordered parameters, are considerably better, and their performance is close to that of the optimal predictors, which cannot in general be computed explicitly.