BZPEERPapers, people, evidence and research paths
Menu

Discover

SearchFind papers, people, topics, institutions and opportunities from one place.GraphSee how papers, authors, topics and evidence connect.

Research tools

HomeContinue from the papers, people and topics that matter now.CollectionsTurn saved papers into reading lists, evidence maps and shareable context.ResearchReconstruct the path that led you from search to paper to question.CollaborationMove from a paper, topic or expert request into a focused thread.PublishCreate full-text research articles with metadata, formulas and versions.

Network

ExpertsFind specialists whose work and reviews explain why they can help.CommunitiesJoin research groups organized around papers, topics and shared evidence.

Opportunities

ListingsBrowse roles, calls and collaborations connected to real research context.

Account

Log inReturn to your saved papers, graph views and active threads.Create accountStart saving papers, building a research trail and joining teams.
Log inCreate account

Source author record

Yonghua Yang

Yonghua Yang appears in the imported research catalog. Authorship, coauthor and topic links are available while profile ownership is still unclaimed.

ResearcherUnclaimed source record
Information RetrievalComputation and LanguageHuman-Computer Interaction

Catalog footprint

What is connected

2works
3topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Connect this record

Log in to claim
Open graphBrowse works

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent papers, topics, institutions and collaborators without losing the researcher page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

2 published item(s)

preprint2020arXiv

AliCoCo: Alibaba E-commerce Cognitive Concept Net

One of the ultimate goals of e-commerce platforms is to satisfy various shopping needs for their customers. Much efforts are devoted to creating taxonomies or ontologies in e-commerce towards this goal. However, user needs in e-commerce are still not well defined, and none of the existing ontologies has the enough depth and breadth for universal user needs understanding. The semantic gap in-between prevents shopping experience from being more intelligent. In this paper, we propose to construct a large-scale e-commerce cognitive concept net named "AliCoCo", which is practiced in Alibaba, the largest Chinese e-commerce platform in the world. We formally define user needs in e-commerce, then conceptualize them as nodes in the net. We present details on how AliCoCo is constructed semi-automatically and its successful, ongoing and potential applications in e-commerce.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2020arXiv

User Validation of Recommendation Serendipity Metrics

Though it has been recognized that recommending serendipitous (i.e., surprising and relevant) items can be helpful for increasing users' satisfaction and behavioral intention, how to measure serendipity in the offline environment is still an open issue. In recent years, a number of metrics have been proposed, but most of them were based on researchers' assumptions due to the serendipity's subjective nature. In order to validate these metrics' actual performance, we collected over 10,000 users' real feedback data and compared with the metrics' results. It turns out the user profile based metrics, especially content-based ones, perform better than those based on item popularity, in terms of estimating the unexpectedness facet of recommendations. Moreover, the full metrics, which involve the unexpectedness component, relevance, timeliness, and user curiosity, can more accurately indicate the recommendation's serendipity degree, relative to those that just involve some of them. The application of these metrics to several recommender algorithms further consolidates their practical usage, because the comparison results are consistent with those from user evaluation. Thus, this work is constructive for filling the gap between offline measurement and user study on recommendation serendipity.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access