BZPEERReading, trust and collaboration for research
Menu

Discover

GraphFollow connections around a paper, topic or saved view.

Workspaces

HomePick up where your research flow left off.InboxHandle requests, replies and notifications from one place.CollectionsCurate reading lists, evidence sets and shareable dossiers.ResearchSee your private provenance graph, trail and imports.CollaborationMove from discovery into focused discussion rooms.PublishDraft, preview and publish full-text research articles.

Network

ExpertsFind specialists worth following or asking for help.CommunitiesJoin research circles organized around shared work.PartnersSee external organizations active around the same topics.

Opportunities

ListingsBrowse roles, calls and collaborations with clearer fit signals.

Account

Log inReturn to your reading and collaboration workspace.Create accountStart saving work, following people and joining teams.
Log inCreate account

Researcher profile

Yoichi Watanabe

Yoichi Watanabe contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.

ResearcherAffiliation not importedOpen to collaborate
eess.IVphysics.med-phQuantitative MethodsTissues and Organs

Trust snapshot

Quick read

Trust 13 - UnverifiedVerification L1Unclaimed author
2works
0followers
4topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Decide how to stay connected

Follow researcher0

Identity and collaboration

How to connect with this researcher

Claiming links this public author record to a researcher profile and unlocks direct collaboration workflows.

Log in to claim

Direct collaboration

Open a focused conversation when the fit is right

Claim this author entity first to unlock direct invitations.

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

2 published item(s)

preprint2022arXiv

Classification of anatomic structures in head and neck by CT-based radiomics

Background and Purpose: Radiomics features are used to identify disease types and predict therapy outcomes. However, how the radiomics features are different among different anatomical structures has never been investigated. Hence, we analyzed the radiomics features of 22 anatomical structures in the head and neck area in CT images. Furthermore, we studied whether CT radiomics can classify anatomical structures of the head and neck using unsupervised machine-learning techniques. Materials and methods: We obtained IMRT/VMAT treatment planning data from 36 patients treated for head and neck cancers in a single institution. There were 1357 contours of more than 22 anatomical structures drawn on planning CTs. We calculated 174 radiomics features using the SIBEX program. First, we tested whether the radiomics features of anatomical structures were unique enough to classify all contours into 22 groups. We then developed a two-stage clustering technique to classify 22 anatomic structures into sub-groups with similar physiological or biological characteristics. Results: The heatmap of 174 radiomics features of 22 anatomical structures showed a distinct difference among tumors and other healthy structures. Radiomics features have allowed us to identify the eyes, lens, submandibular, pituitary glands, and thyroids with over 90% accuracy. The two-stage clustering of 22 structures resulted in six subgroups, which shared common characteristics such as fatty and bony tissues. Conclusions: We have shown that anatomical structures in head and neck tumors have distinguishable radiomics features. We could observe similarities of features among subgroups of the structures. The results suggest that CT radiomics can help distinguish the biological characteristics of head and neck lesions.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2015arXiv

Robust and probabilistic optimization of dose schedules in radiotherapy

We consider the effects of parameter uncertainty on the optimal radiation schedule in the context of the linear-quadratic model. Our interest arises from the observation that if inter-patient variations in OAR and tumor sensitivities to radiation or sparing factor of the OAR are not accounted for during radiation scheduling, the performance of the therapy may be strongly degraded or the OAR may receive a substantially larger dose than the maximum threshold. This paper proposes two radiation scheduling concepts to incorporate inter-patient variability into the scheduling optimization problem. The first approach is a robust formulation that formulates the problem as a conservative model that optimizes the worst case dose scheduling that may occur. The second method is a probabilistic approach, where the model parameters are given by a set of random variables. This formulation insures that our constraints are satisfied with a given probability, and that our objective function achieves a desired level with a stated probability. We used a transformation to reduce the resulting optimization problem to two dimensions. We showed that the optimal solution lies on the boundary of the feasible region and we used a branch and bound algorithm to find the global optimal solution. We observed that if the number of fractions in the optimal conventional schedule is the same as the robust and stochastic solutions, it is preferable to administer equal or smaller total dose. In addition if there exist more (fewer) treatment sessions in the probabilistic or robust solution compared to the conventional schedule, a reduction in total dose squared (total dose) will be expected. Finally, we performed numerical experiments in the setting of head-and-neck tumors to reveal the effect of parameter uncertainty on optimal schedules and to evaluate the sensitivity of the model to the choice of key model parameters.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access