Source author record

Yinghui Wang

Yinghui Wang appears in the imported research catalog. Authorship, coauthor and topic links are available while profile ownership is still unclaimed.

ResearcherUnclaimed source record

Catalog footprint

What is connected

5works
3topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Connect this record

Log in to claim

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent papers, topics, institutions and collaborators without losing the researcher page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

5 published item(s)

preprint2022arXiv

Achieving Social Optimum in Non-convex Cooperative Aggregative Games: A Distributed Stochastic Annealing Approach

This paper designs a distributed stochastic annealing algorithm for non-convex cooperative aggregative games, whose agents' cost functions not only depend on agents' own decision variables but also rely on the sum of agents' decision variables. To seek the the social optimum of cooperative aggregative games, a distributed stochastic annealing algorithm is proposed, where the local cost functions are non-convex and the communication topology between agents is time varying. The weak convergence to the social optimum of the algorithm is further analyzed. A numerical example is given to illustrate the effectiveness of the proposed algorithm.

preprint2015arXiv

Viscosity Characterization of the Arbitrage Function under Model Uncertainty

We show that in an equity market model with Knightian uncertainty regarding the relative risk and covariance structure of its assets, the arbitrage function -- defined as the reciprocal of the highest return on investment that can be achieved relative to the market using nonanticipative strategies, and under any admissible market model configuration -- is a viscosity solution of an associated Hamilton-Jacobi-Bellman (HJB) equation under appropriate boundedness, continuity and Markovian assumptions on the uncertainty structure. This result generalizes that of Fernholz and Karatzas (2011), who characterized this arbitrage function as a classical solution of a Cauchy problem for this HJB equation under much stronger conditions than those needed here.

preprint2011arXiv

From Fibonacci Numbers to Central Limit Type Theorems

A beautiful theorem of Zeckendorf states that every integer can be written uniquely as a sum of non-consecutive Fibonacci numbers $\{F_n\}_{n=1}^{\infty}$. Lekkerkerker proved that the average number of summands for integers in $[F_n, F_{n+1})$ is $n/(ϕ^2 + 1)$, with $ϕ$ the golden mean. This has been generalized to the following: given nonnegative integers $c_1,c_2,...,c_L$ with $c_1,c_L>0$ and recursive sequence $\{H_n\}_{n=1}^{\infty}$ with $H_1=1$, $H_{n+1} =c_1H_n+c_2H_{n-1}+...+c_nH_1+1$ $(1\le n< L)$ and $H_{n+1}=c_1H_n+c_2H_{n-1}+...+c_LH_{n+1-L}$ $(n\geq L)$, every positive integer can be written uniquely as $\sum a_iH_i$ under natural constraints on the $a_i$'s, the mean and the variance of the numbers of summands for integers in $[H_{n}, H_{n+1})$ are of size $n$, and the distribution of the numbers of summands converges to a Gaussian as $n$ goes to the infinity. Previous approaches used number theory or ergodic theory. We convert the problem to a combinatorial one. In addition to re-deriving these results, our method generalizes to a multitude of other problems (in the sequel paper \cite{BM} we show how this perspective allows us to determine the distribution of gaps between summands in decompositions). For example, it is known that every integer can be written uniquely as a sum of the $\pm F_n$'s, such that every two terms of the same (opposite) sign differ in index by at least 4 (3). The presence of negative summands introduces complications and features not seen in previous problems. We prove that the distribution of the numbers of positive and negative summands converges to a bivariate normal with computable, negative correlation, namely $-(21-2ϕ)/(29+2ϕ) \approx -0.551058$.

preprint2011arXiv

Gaussian Behavior in Generalized Zeckendorf Decompositions

A beautiful theorem of Zeckendorf states that every integer can be written uniquely as a sum of non-consecutive Fibonacci numbers $\{F_n\}_{n=1}^{\infty}$; Lekkerkerker proved that the average number of summands for integers in $[F_n, F_{n+1})$ is $n/(ϕ^2 + 1)$, with $ϕ$ the golden mean. Interestingly, the higher moments seem to have been ignored. We discuss the proof that the distribution of the number of summands converges to a Gaussian as $n \to \infty$, and comment on generalizations to related decompositions. For example, every integer can be written uniquely as a sum of the $\pm F_n$'s, such that every two terms of the same (opposite) sign differ in index by at least 4 (3). The distribution of the numbers of positive and negative summands converges to a bivariate normal with computable, negative correlation, namely $-(21-2ϕ)/(29+2ϕ) \approx -0.551058$.

preprint2010arXiv

On the number of summands in Zeckendorf decompositions

Zeckendorf proved that every positive integer has a unique representation as a sum of non-consecutive Fibonacci numbers. Once this has been shown, it's natural to ask how many summands are needed. Using a continued fraction approach, Lekkerkerker proved that the average number of such summands needed for integers in $[F_n, F_{n+1})$ is $n / (φ^2 + 1) + O(1)$, where $φ= \frac{1+\sqrt{5}}2$ is the golden mean. Surprisingly, no one appears to have investigated the distribution of the number of summands; our main result is that this converges to a Gaussian as $n\to\infty$. Moreover, such a result holds not just for the Fibonacci numbers but many other problems, such as linear recurrence relation with non-negative integer coefficients (which is a generalization of base $B$ expansions of numbers) and far-difference representations. In general the proofs involve adopting a combinatorial viewpoint and analyzing the resulting generating functions through partial fraction expansions and differentiating identities. The resulting arguments become quite technical; the purpose of this paper is to concentrate on the special and most interesting case of the Fibonacci numbers, where the obstructions vanish and the proofs follow from some combinatorics and Stirling's formula; see [MW] for proofs in the general case.