Source author record

Yimeng Xie

Yimeng Xie appears in the imported research catalog. Authorship, coauthor and topic links are available while profile ownership is still unclaimed.

ResearcherUnclaimed source record

Applications Computation econ.EM Methodology

Catalog footprint

What is connected

5works

4topics

4close collaborators

Actions

Connect this record

Open graph Browse works

Inspect adjacent papers, topics, institutions and collaborators without losing the researcher page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

preprint2026arXiv

How to Detect Network Dependence in Latent Factor Models? A Bias-Corrected CD Test

In a recent paper Juodis and Reese (2022) (JR) show that the application of the CD test proposed by Pesaran (2004) to residuals from panels with latent factors results in over-rejection. They propose a randomized test statistic to correct for over-rejection, and add a screening component to achieve power. This paper considers the same problem but from a different perspective, and shows that the standard CD test remains valid if the latent factors are weak in the sense the strength is less than half. In the case where latent factors are strong, we propose a bias-corrected version, CD*, which is shown to be asymptotically standard normal under the null of error cross-sectional independence and have power against network type alternatives. This result is shown to hold for pure latent factor models as well as for panel regression models with latent factors. The case where the errors are serially correlated is also considered. Small sample properties of the CD* test are investigated by Monte Carlo experiments and are shown to have the correct size for strong and weak factors as well as for Gaussian and non-Gaussian errors. In contrast, it is found that JR's test tends to over-reject in the case of panels with non-Gaussian errors, and has low power against spatial network alternatives. In an empirical application, using the CD* test, it is shown that there remains spatial error dependence in a panel data model for real house price changes across 377 Metropolitan Statistical Areas in the U.S., even after the effects of latent factors are filtered out.

preprint2016arXiv

ADDT: An R Package for Analysis of Accelerated Destructive Degradation Test Data

Accelerated destructive degradation tests (ADDT) are often used to collect necessary data for assessing the long-term properties of polymeric materials. Based on the data, a thermal index (TI) is estimated. The TI can be useful for material rating and comparisons. The R package ADDT provides the functionalities of performing the traditional method based on the least-squares method, the parametric method based on maximum likelihood estimation, and the semiparametric method based on spline methods for analyzing ADDT data, and then estimating the TI for polymeric materials. In this chapter, we provide a detailed introduction to the ADDT package. We provide a step-by-step illustration for the use of functions in the package. Publicly available datasets are used for illustrations.

preprint2016arXiv

Statistical Methods for Thermal Index Estimation Based on Accelerated Destructive Degradation Test Data

Accelerated destructive degradation test (ADDT) is a technique that is commonly used by industries to access material's long-term properties. In many applications, the accelerating variable is usually the temperature. In such cases, a thermal index (TI) is used to indicate the strength of the material. For example, a TI of 200C may be interpreted as the material can be expected to maintain a specific property at a temperature of 200C for 100,000 hours. A material with a higher TI possesses a stronger resistance to thermal damage. In literature, there are three methods available to estimate the TI based on ADDT data, which are the traditional method based on the least-squares approach, the parametric method, and the semiparametric method. In this chapter, we provide a comprehensive review of the three methods and illustrate how the TI can be estimated based on different models. We also conduct comprehensive simulation studies to show the properties of different methods. We provide thorough discussions on the pros and cons of each method. The comparisons and discussion in this chapter can be useful for practitioners and future industrial standards.

preprint2015arXiv

Semi-parametric Models for Accelerated Destructive Degradation Test Data Analysis

Accelerated destructive degradation tests (ADDT) are widely used in industry to evaluate materials' long term properties. Even though there has been tremendous statistical research in nonparametric methods, the current industrial practice is still to use application-specific parametric models to describe ADDT data. The challenge of using a nonparametric approach comes from the need to retain the physical meaning of degradation mechanisms and also perform extrapolation for predictions at the use condition. Motivated by this challenge, we propose a semi-parametric model to describe ADDT data. We use monotonic B-splines to model the degradation path, which not only provides flexible models with few assumptions, but also retains the physical meaning of degradation mechanisms (e.g., the degradation path is monotonically decreasing). Parametric models, such as the Arrhenius model, are used for modeling the relationship between the degradation and accelerating variable, allowing for extrapolation to the use conditions. We develop an efficient procedure to estimate model parameters. We also use simulation to validate the developed procedures and demonstrate the robustness of the semi-parametric model under model misspecification. Finally, the proposed method is illustrated by multiple industrial applications.

preprint2014arXiv

How do heterogeneities in operating environments affect field failure predictions and test planning?

The main objective of accelerated life tests (ALTs) is to predict fraction failings of products in the field. However, there are often discrepancies between the predicted fraction failing from the lab testing data and that from the field failure data, due to the yet unobserved heterogeneities in usage and operating conditions. Most previous research on ALT planning and data analysis ignores the discrepancies, resulting in inferior test plans and biased predictions. In this paper we model the heterogeneous environments together with their effects on the product failures as a frailty term to link the lab failure time distribution and field failure time distribution of a product. We show that in the presence of the heterogeneous operating conditions, the hazard rate function of the field failure time distribution exhibits a range of shapes. Statistical inference procedure for the frailty models is developed when both the ALT data and the field failure data are available. Based on the frailty models, optimal ALT plans aimed at predicting the field failure time distribution are obtained. The developed methods are demonstrated through a real life example.