Researcher profile

Yicun Zhen

Yicun Zhen contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.

ResearcherAffiliation not importedOpen to collaborate

Trust snapshot

Quick read

Trust 13 - UnverifiedVerification L1Unclaimed author
2works
0followers
2topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Decide how to stay connected

Follow researcher0

Identity and collaboration

How to connect with this researcher

Claiming links this public author record to a researcher profile and unlocks direct collaboration workflows.

Log in to claim

Direct collaboration

Open a focused conversation when the fit is right

Claim this author entity first to unlock direct invitations.

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

2 published item(s)

preprint2022arXiv

Eigenvalues of Autocovariance Matrix: A Practical Method to Identify the Koopman Eigenfrequencies

To infer eigenvalues of the infinite-dimensional Koopman operator, we study the leading eigenvalues of the autocovariance matrix associated with a given observable of a dynamical system. For any observable $f$ for which all the time-delayed autocovariance exist, we construct a Hilbert space $\mathcal{H}_f$ and a Koopman-like operator $\mathcal{K}$ that acts on $\mathcal{H}_f$. We prove that the leading eigenvalues of the autocovariance matrix has one-to-one correspondence with the energy of $f$ that is represented by the eigenvectors of $\mathcal{K}$. The proof is associated to several representation theorems of isometric operators on a Hilbert space, and the weak-mixing property of the observables represented by the continuous spectrum. We also provide an alternative proof of the weakly mixing property. When $f$ is an observable of an ergodic dynamical system which has a finite invariant measure $μ$, $\mathcal{H}_f$ coincides with closure in $L^2(X,dμ)$ of Krylov subspace generated by $f$, and $\mathcal{K}$ coincides with the classical Koopman operator. The main theorem sheds light to the theoretical foundation of several semi-empirical methods, including singular spectrum analysis (SSA), data-adaptive harmonic analysis (DAHD), Hankel DMD and Hankel alternative view of Koopman analysis (HAVOK). It shows that, when the system is ergodic and has finite invariant measure, the leading temporal empirical orthogonal functions indeed correspond to the Koopman eigenfrequencies. A theorem-based practical methodology is then proposed to identify the eigenfrequencies of $\mathcal{K}$ from a given time series. It builds on the fact that the convergence of the renormalized eigenvalues of the Gram matrix is a necessary and sufficient condition for the existence of $\mathcal{K}-$eigenfrequencies.

preprint2020arXiv

A Review of Innovation-Based Methods to Jointly Estimate Model and Observation Error Covariance Matrices in Ensemble Data Assimilation

Data assimilation combines forecasts from a numerical model with observations. Most of the current data assimilation algorithms consider the model and observation error terms as additive Gaussian noise, specified by their covariance matrices Q and R, respectively. These error covariances, and specifically their respective amplitudes, determine the weights given to the background (i.e., the model forecasts) and to the observations in the solution of data assimilation algorithms (i.e., the analysis). Consequently, Q and R matrices significantly impact the accuracy of the analysis. This review aims to present and to discuss, with a unified framework, different methods to jointly estimate the Q and R matrices using ensemble-based data assimilation techniques. Most of the methodologies developed to date use the innovations, defined as differences between the observations and the projection of the forecasts onto the observation space. These methodologies are based on two main statistical criteria: (i) the method of moments, in which the theoretical and empirical moments of the innovations are assumed to be equal, and (ii) methods that use the likelihood of the observations, themselves contained in the innovations. The reviewed methods assume that innovations are Gaussian random variables, although extension to other distributions is possible for likelihood-based methods. The methods also show some differences in terms of levels of complexity and applicability to high-dimensional systems. The conclusion of the review discusses the key challenges to further develop estimation methods for Q and R. These challenges include taking into account time-varying error covariances, using limited observational coverage, estimating additional deterministic error terms, or accounting for correlated noises.