BZPEERReading, trust and collaboration for research
Menu

Discover

GraphFollow connections around a paper, topic or saved view.

Workspaces

HomePick up where your research flow left off.InboxHandle requests, replies and notifications from one place.CollectionsCurate reading lists, evidence sets and shareable dossiers.ResearchSee your private provenance graph, trail and imports.CollaborationMove from discovery into focused discussion rooms.PublishDraft, preview and publish full-text research articles.

Network

ExpertsFind specialists worth following or asking for help.CommunitiesJoin research circles organized around shared work.PartnersSee external organizations active around the same topics.

Opportunities

ListingsBrowse roles, calls and collaborations with clearer fit signals.

Account

Log inReturn to your reading and collaboration workspace.Create accountStart saving work, following people and joining teams.
Log inCreate account

Researcher profile

Yatendra S. Jain

Yatendra S. Jain contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.

ResearcherAffiliation not importedOpen to collaborate
cond-mat.otherphysics.atm-clusquant-phcond-mat.quant-gas

Trust snapshot

Quick read

Trust 21 - EmergingVerification L1Unclaimed author
10works
0followers
4topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Decide how to stay connected

Follow researcher0

Identity and collaboration

How to connect with this researcher

Claiming links this public author record to a researcher profile and unlocks direct collaboration workflows.

Log in to claim

Direct collaboration

Open a focused conversation when the fit is right

Claim this author entity first to unlock direct invitations.

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

10 published item(s)

preprint2012arXiv

On the free rotation of a molecule embedded in helium-4 clusters

The fact, that $^4$He atoms on different concentric circular paths around the axis of a quantum vortex move with identically equal angular momentum, which represents an important aspect of superfluidity of He-II, has been used to discover a model which can explain the {\it typical nature} of experimentally observed $N$ (number of $^4He$ atoms) dependence of the rotational constant ($B$) of the rotor part of a cluster M:He$_N$. It reveals how exactly superfluidity is related to the said dependence of $B$ on $N$. We believe that this model, when used with simulation techniques, would render results that would agree closely with experiments.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2011arXiv

On the origin of Stark effect of rotons in He-II and the existence of p = 0 condensate

Linear Stark effect of roton transition, experimentally observed through microwave absorption in He-II (superfluid He) in the presence of varying external electric field, is critically analysed. We find that: (i) The effect cannot be explained in terms of conventional microscopic theory (CMT) of He-II which presumes the existence of p = 0 condensate and concludes that He atoms even at T = 0 have random motions and mutual collisions which do not support the basic factor (viz. an ordered arrangement of atomic electric dipoles) needed for its occurrence. (ii) The desired order is concluded, rather, by a non-conventional microscopic theory (NCMT) as an intrinsic property of He-II. Accordingly, all atoms in He-II define a closepacked arrangement of their wave packets (CPA-WP) with identically equal nearest neighbour distance (d), per particle zero-point energy (ε0 = h2/8md2) and equivalent momentum, h/2d. (iii) The CPA-WP prevent atoms from having relative motions and mutual collisions capable of disturbing any order of atomic dipoles. As such the NCMT and the observed Stark effect have strong mutual support; whereas the former concludes CPA-WP necessary for the occurrence of the effect, the latter strengthens the experimental support for the former, which means that theobservation does not support the presence of p = 0 condensate in He-II.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2011arXiv

Quantum dynamics of molecules in 4He nano-droplets: Microscopic Superfluidity

High resolution spectroscopy of doped molecules in 4He nano-droplets and clusters gives a signature of superfluidity in microscopic system, termed as microscopic superfluidity. Ro-vibrational spectrum of 4HeN-M clusters is studied with the help of some important observations, revealed from experiments (viz., localised and orderly arrangement of 4He atoms, although, being free to move in the order of their locations; individual 4He atoms can not be tagged as normal/ superfluid, etc.) and other factors (e.g., consideration that the 4He atoms which happen to fall in the plane of rotation of a molecule, render a equipotential ring and thus, do not take part in rotation; etc.) which effect the rotational and vibrational spectrum of the system. This helps us in successfully explaining the experimental findings which state that the rotational spectrum of clusters have sharp peaks (indicating that the molecule rotates like a free rotor) and moment of inertia and vibrational frequency shift have a non-trivial dependence on N.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2011arXiv

Quantum dynamics of OCS molecule doped in superfluid 4He nanodroplet

In this paper, we explain the change of rotational constant (B) and vibrational frequency shift of 4HeN-OCS clusters with N by using important inferences of Macro-Orbital theory of superfluidity and several other factors that can change B and vibrational frequency. Consequently, this helps us in understanding the extra ordinary experimental observations that (i) B decreases monotonically from N = 1 to 9 and rises thereafter to follow broad oscillations with maxima at N = 24, 47 and minima at 36 and 62 and (ii) vibrational frequency shift has blue shift for N ~ 1 - 6, with steady red shift thereafter having a change in slope at N ~ 17.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2011arXiv

Ro-vibrational dynamics of N2O in superfluid 4He nano-droplets

In this paper we use the important interferences of Macro-Orbital theory of superfluidity clubbed with several factors that can change the rotational constant (B) and vibrational frequency of N2O in 4HeN-N2O clusters with N to account for the results of their recently reported spectroscopic studies which conclude that: (i) in spite of the fact that 4He atoms provide an interactive medium, the rotational spectrum of the clusters shows sharp peaks, similar to that of the molecule in gaseous state, indicating that the molecule rotates like a free rotor, (ii) B decreases monotonically from N = 1 to 6, remains nearly constant for N = 6 to 8 and increases for N = 9 to 10 with small oscillations there after and (iii) vibrational frequency exhibits blue shift for N = 1 to 5 and a red shift for higher N.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2010arXiv

Experimental realities refuting existence of p=0 condensate in a system of interacting bosons : I. Electron bubble

Physical reality of the existence of electron bubble in liquid $^4He$ (or $^3He$) renders a {\it clear experimental evidence} for a quantum particle (in an interacting environment as seen by electron in liquid helium) to occupy exclusively a space of size $λ/2$ that, obviously, depends on its energy/momentum. This unequivocally proves that {\it no particle} in a system of interacting bosons such as liquid $^4He$ has momentum $p=0$; in stead, {\it all particles} in the ground state of such a system are in the single quantum state of energy $\varepsilon_o = h^2/8md^2$ or momentum $p = h/2d$.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2010arXiv

Experimental realities refuting the existence of p=0 condensate in a system of interacting bosons : II. Spectroscopy of embedded molecules

Experimental observation of superfluidity in a microscopic cluster, $M:(^4He)_x$, of a molecule ($M$) and $x$ number of $^4He$ atoms (with $x$ ranging from 1 to many) is qualitatively analyzed. It concludes that: (i) each $^4He$ atom in the cluster has to have non-zero momentum for its confinement to a space of size ($<$ the size of the cluster), (ii) superfluidity does not require atoms with zero momentum ($p=0$), and (iii) while all $^4He$ atoms in the cluster cease to have relative motions (hence the inter-atomic collisions), they retain a freedom to move coherently in order of their locations on a closed path around the rotor ($M$ plus few nearest $^4He$ atoms which follow the molecular rotation for their relatively strong binding with $M$). The analysis also identifies the basic arrangement of $^4He$ atoms which allows the rotor to have free rotation in the cluster.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2010arXiv

The p=0 condensate is a myth

Analyzing some of the basic aspects of the dynamics of two bosons (interacting through a central force) and their importance in determining the ground state of a system like liquid $^4He$, it is unequivocally concluded that our conventional belief in the existence $p=0$ condensate in the superfluid state of such systems [including the state of Bose Einstein condensate (BEC) of trapped dilute gases] is a myth.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2006arXiv

Wave Mechanics of Two Hard Core Quantum Particles in 1-D Box

The wave mechanics of two impenetrable hard core particles in 1-D box is analyzed. Each particle in the box behaves like an independent entity represented by a {\it macro-orbital} (a kind of pair waveform). While the expectation value of their interaction, $<V_{HC}(x)>$, vanishes for every state of two particles, the expectation value of their relative separation, $<x>$, satisfies $<x> \ge λ/2$ (or $q \ge π/d$, with $2d = L$ being the size of the box). The particles in their ground state define a close-packed arrangement of their wave packets (with $<x> = λ/2$, phase position separation $Δϕ= 2π$ and momentum $|q_o| = π/d$) and experience a mutual repulsive force ({\it zero point repulsion}) $f_o = h^2/2md^3$ which also tries to expand the box. While the relative dynamics of two particles in their excited states represents usual collisional motion, the same in their ground state becomes collisionless. These results have great significance in determining the correct microscopic understanding of widely different many body systems.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access