Researcher profile

Yanpeng Yang

Yanpeng Yang contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.

ResearcherAffiliation not importedOpen to collaborate

Trust snapshot

Quick read

Trust 15 - UnverifiedVerification L1Unclaimed author
3works
0followers
4topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Decide how to stay connected

Follow researcher0

Identity and collaboration

How to connect with this researcher

Claiming links this public author record to a researcher profile and unlocks direct collaboration workflows.

Log in to claim

Direct collaboration

Open a focused conversation when the fit is right

Claim this author entity first to unlock direct invitations.

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

3 published item(s)

preprint2024arXiv

3GPP Release 18 Wake-up Receiver: Feature Overview and Evaluations

Enhancing the energy efficiency of devices stands as one of the key requirements in the fifth-generation (5G) cellular network and its evolutions toward the next generation wireless technology. Specifically, for battery-limited Internet-of-Things (IoT) devices where downlink monitoring significantly contributes to energy consumption, efficient solutions are required for power saving while addressing performance tradeoffs. In this regard, the use of a low-power wake-up receiver (WUR) and wake-up signal (WUS) is an attractive solution for reducing the energy consumption of devices without compromising the downlink latency. This paper provides an overview of the standardization study on the design of low-power WUR and WUS within Release 18 of the third-generation partnership project (3GPP). We describe design principles, receiver architectures, waveform characteristics, and device procedures upon detection of WUS. In addition, we provide representative results to show the performance of the WUR in terms of power saving, coverage, and network overhead along with highlighting design tradeoffs.

preprint2022arXiv

Impact of Network Densification on the Performance of a Non-Public URLLC Factory Network

Densification of the network deployment, for example by adding new sectors or sites within an existing mobile communication network, has traditionally been an efficient way to improve the system coverage and capacity. That will be the case even for the ultra-reliable low-latency communication (URLLC) services, but the overall situation and the feasibility of the different deployment options will depend on the characteristics of the URLLC service in question. URLLC services with relaxed latency requirements, allowing multiple transmission attempts, can tolerate a decent level of inter-cell interference while still being able to guarantee the desired quality-of-service for all users, which makes it possible to improve the URLLC service capacity by adding new gNodeBs with omnidirectional or directional antennas. However, when the URLLC services require extremely low latency that do not allow for retransmissions, the system performance becomes quite sensitive to the inter-cell interference, which means that in practice the gNodeBs should be equipped with beamformed antennas to reach high levels of URLLC service capacity. Finally, an active distributed antenna system could be an efficient way to secure good coverage throughout the desired service area.

preprint2022arXiv

On the Performance of Co-existence between Public eMBB and Non-public URLLC Networks

To ensure the high level of automation required in today's industrial applications, next-generation wireless networks must enable real-time control and automation of dynamic processes with the requirements of extreme low-latency and ultra-reliable communications. In this paper, we provide a performance assessment for the co-existence of a public enhanced mobile broadband (eMBB) and a local non-public factory (URLLC) network and evaluate the network conditions under which the stringent latency and reliability requirements of factory automation applications are met. The evaluations consider both an unsynchronized and a synchronized time division duplexing (TDD) deployment between the networks, as well as scenarios both with and without any macro eMBB traffic located inside the factory. The results show that an unsynchronized deployment is possible if the isolation between the networks is sufficiently high, either as a result of a separation distance, wall loss or the use of separate frequencies for the networks. A synchronized deployment will avoid the cross-link interference, but it will not resolve the problems related to the closed access and the near-far interference. If the factory contains eMBB traffic served by the overlaid macro cells, the performance of both networks will suffer due to a high level of cross-link and near-far interference. The problems related to the cross-link interference can be resolved by synchronizing the networks, while the level of the near-far interference can be reduced by allowing the eMBB users to be connected to base stations located inside the factory. Finally, if an unsynchronized deployment is desired, the factory should be deployed on an isolated frequency.