BZPEERPapers, people, evidence and research paths
Menu

Discover

SearchFind papers, people, topics, institutions and opportunities from one place.GraphSee how papers, authors, topics and evidence connect.

Research tools

HomeContinue from the papers, people and topics that matter now.CollectionsTurn saved papers into reading lists, evidence maps and shareable context.ResearchReconstruct the path that led you from search to paper to question.CollaborationMove from a paper, topic or expert request into a focused thread.PublishCreate full-text research articles with metadata, formulas and versions.

Network

ExpertsFind specialists whose work and reviews explain why they can help.CommunitiesJoin research groups organized around papers, topics and shared evidence.

Opportunities

ListingsBrowse roles, calls and collaborations connected to real research context.

Account

Log inReturn to your saved papers, graph views and active threads.Create accountStart saving papers, building a research trail and joining teams.
Log inCreate account

Source author record

Yangbo Song

Yangbo Song appears in the imported research catalog. Authorship, coauthor and topic links are available while profile ownership is still unclaimed.

ResearcherUnclaimed source record
Computer Science and Game TheorySocial and Information Networksphysics.soc-ph

Catalog footprint

What is connected

7works
3topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Connect this record

Log in to claim
Open graphBrowse works

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent papers, topics, institutions and collaborators without losing the researcher page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

7 published item(s)

preprint2016arXiv

Dynamic R&D Competition under Uncertainty and Strategic Disclosure

We study a model of dynamic two-stage R&D competition where the competing firms are uncertain about the difficulty of the first stage. Staying in the competition is costly and a firm can also choose whether and when to quit. When a firm solves the first stage, it can choose whether and when to disclose the solution. We find that there exists a unique symmetric equilibrium, in which each firm will disclose the solution of the first stage if it arrives early, withhold the solution if it arrives neither too soon nor too late, and exit the competition if it has not arrived after a sufficiently long time. From a social welfare perspective, a competition is surprisingly not always optimal: in certain scenarios, it is socially more desirable to assign the R&D project to a single firm.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2016arXiv

Social Learning with Endogenous Network Formation

I study the problem of social learning in a model where agents move sequentially. Each agent receives a private signal about the underlying state of the world, observes the past actions in a neighborhood of individuals, and chooses her action attempting to match the true state. Earlier research in this field emphasizes that herding behavior occurs with a positive probability in certain special cases; recent studies show that asymptotic learning is achievable under a more general observation structure. In particular, with unbounded private beliefs, asymptotic learning occurs if and only if agents observe a close predecessor, i.e., the action of a close predecessor reveals the true state in the limit. However, a prevailing assumption in these studies is that the observation structure in the society is exogenous. In contrast to most of the previous literature, I assume in this paper that observation is endogenous and costly. More specifically, each agent must pay a specific cost to make any observation and can strategically choose the set of actions to observe privately. I introduce the notion of maximal learning (relative to cost) as a natural extension of asymptotic learning: society achieves maximal learning when agents can learn the true state with probability 1 in the limit after paying the cost of observation. I show that observing only a close predecessor is no longer sufficient for learning the true state with unbounded private beliefs and positive costs. Instead, maximal learning occurs if and only if the size of the observations extends to infinity. I provide interesting comparative statics as to how various settings in the model affect the learning probability. For instance, the probability to learn the true state may be higher under positive costs than under zero cost; in addition, the probability to learn the true state may be higher under weaker private signals.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2016arXiv

Why Scientists Chase Big Problems: Individual Strategy and Social Optimality

Scientists pursue collective knowledge, but they also seek personal recognition from their peers. When scientists decide whether or not to work on a big new problem, they weigh the potential rewards of a major discovery against the costs of setting aside other projects. These self-interested choices can potentially spread researchers across problems in an efficient manner, but efficiency is not guaranteed. We use simple economic models to understand such decisions and their collective consequences. Academic science differs from industrial R&D in that academics often share partial solutions to gain reputation. This convention of Open Science is thought to accelerate collective discovery, but we find that it need not do so. The ability to share partial results influences which scientists work on a particular problem; consequently, Open Science can slow down the solution of a problem if it deters entry by important actors.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2015arXiv

Dynamic Network Formation with Foresighted Agents

What networks can form and persist when agents are self-interested? Can such networks be efficient? A substantial theoretical literature predicts that the only networks that can form and persist must have very special shapes and that such networks cannot be efficient, but these predictions are in stark contrast to empirical findings. In this paper, we present a new model of network formation. In contrast to the existing literature, our model is dynamic (rather than static), we model agents as foresighted (rather than myopic) and we allow for the possibility that agents are heterogeneous (rather than homogeneous). We show that a very wide variety of networks can form and persist; in particular, efficient networks can form and persist if they provide every agent a strictly positive payoff. For the widely-studied connections model, we provide a full characterization of the set of efficient networks that can form and persist. Our predictions are consistent with empirical findings.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2015arXiv

Social Learning with Coordination Motives

The theoretical study of social learning typically assumes that each agent's action affects only her own payoff. In this paper, I present a model in which agents' actions directly affect the payoffs of other agents. On a discrete time line, there is a community containing a random number of agents in each period. Before each agent needs to take an action, the community receives a private signal about the underlying state of the world and may observe some past actions in previous communities. An agent's payoff is higher if her action matches the state or if more agents take the same action as hers. I analyze two observation structures: exogenous observation and costly strategic observation. In both cases, coordination motives enhance social learning in the sense that agents take the correct action with significantly higher probability when the community size is greater than a threshold. In particular, this probability reaches one (asymptotic learning) with unbounded private beliefs and can be arbitrarily close to one with bounded private beliefs. I then discuss the issue of multiple equilibria and use risk dominance as a criterion for equilibrium selection. I find that in the selected equilibria, the community size has no effect on learning under exogenous observation, facilitates learning under endogenous observation and unbounded private beliefs, and either helps or hinders learning under endogenous observation and bounded private beliefs.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2014arXiv

Dynamic Network Formation with Incomplete Information

How do networks form and what is their ultimate topology? Most of the literature that addresses these questions assumes complete information: agents know in advance the value of linking to other agents, even with agents they have never met and with whom they have had no previous interaction (direct or indirect). This paper addresses the same questions under what seems to us to be the much more natural assumption of incomplete information: agents do not know in advance -- but must learn -- the value of linking to agents they have never met. We show that the assumption of incomplete information has profound implications for the process of network formation and the topology of networks that ultimately form. Under complete information, the networks that form and are stable typically have a star, wheel or core-periphery form, with high-value agents in the core. Under incomplete information, the presence of positive externalities (the value of indirect links) implies that a much wider collection of network topologies can emerge and be stable. Moreover, even when the topologies that emerge are the same, the locations of agents can be very different. For instance, when information is incomplete, it is possible for a hub-and-spokes network with a low-value agent in the center to form and endure permanently: an agent can achieve a central position purely as the result of chance rather than as the result of merit. Perhaps even more strikingly: when information is incomplete, a connected network could form and persist even if, when information were complete, no links would ever form, so that the final form would be a totally disconnected network. All of this can occur even in settings where agents eventually learn everything so that information, although initially incomplete, eventually becomes complete.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2013arXiv

Information Sharing in Networks of Strategic Agents

To ensure that social networks (e.g. opinion consensus, cooperative estimation, distributed learning and adaptation etc.) proliferate and efficiently operate, the participating agents need to collaborate with each other by repeatedly sharing information. However, sharing information is often costly for the agents while resulting in no direct immediate benefit for them. Hence, lacking incentives to collaborate, strategic agents who aim to maximize their own individual utilities will withhold rather than share information, leading to inefficient operation or even collapse of networks. In this paper, we develop a systematic framework for designing distributed rating protocols aimed at incentivizing the strategic agents to collaborate with each other by sharing information. The proposed incentive protocols exploit the ongoing nature of the agents' interactions to assign ratings and through them, determine future rewards and punishments: agents that have behaved as directed enjoy high ratings -- and hence greater future access to the information of others; agents that have not behaved as directed enjoy low ratings -- and hence less future access to the information of others. Unlike existing rating protocols, the proposed protocol operates in a distributed manner, online, and takes into consideration the underlying interconnectivity of agents as well as their heterogeneity. We prove that in many deployment scenarios the price of anarchy (PoA) obtained by adopting the proposed rating protocols is one. In settings in which the PoA is larger than one, we show that the proposed rating protocol still significantly outperforms existing incentive mechanisms such as Tit-for-Tat. Importantly, the proposed rating protocols can also operate efficiently in deployment scenarios where the strategic agents interact over time-varying network topologies where new agents join the network over time.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access