Source author record

Yan Yuan

Yan Yuan appears in the imported research catalog. Authorship, coauthor and topic links are available while profile ownership is still unclaimed.

ResearcherUnclaimed source record

Catalog footprint

What is connected

2works
2topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Connect this record

Log in to claim

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent papers, topics, institutions and collaborators without losing the researcher page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

2 published item(s)

preprint2016arXiv

A Two-Stage Patient-Focused Study Design for Rare Disease Controlled Trials

We developed a study design for rare disease clinical trials (RDTs) that efficiently evaluate treatments, promotes access to new treatments during treatment development, and optimizes healthcare resource utilization for future treatment allocation, development, and prioritization. Comprehensive literature review and focus group discussion were conducted. To address the multifaceted challenges facing RDTs, four key issues for RDTs must be addressed, which are 1) the opportunity to access the new treatment; 2) assessment of outcomes where clinically validated outcomes may be lacking; 3) patient heterogeneity; and 4) duration of the study and number of patients required. Our proposed study design has two stages. Stage 1 distinguishes patients who respond to the treatment from those who do not respond to the treatment after assigning them all to the experimental treatment. Stage 2 evaluates the treatment effect comparatively among patients responded in Stage 1. In addition to treatment effect evaluation, our design can greatly benefit rare disease patients and clinical practice by increasing opportunities to access experimental treatments and by providing relevant information that can be used for tailoring treatments to certain subgroups, aiding future research in treatment development, and improving healthcare resource utilization.

preprint2013arXiv

Threshold-free Evaluation of Medical Tests for Classification and Prediction: Average Precision versus Area Under the ROC Curve

When evaluating medical tests or biomarkers for disease classification, the area under the receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) curve is a widely used performance metric that does not require us to commit to a specific decision threshold. For the same type of evaluations, a different metric known as the average precision (AP) is used much more widely in the information retrieval literature. We study both metrics in some depths in order to elucidate their difference and relationship. More specifically, we explain mathematically why the AP may be more appropriate if the earlier part of the ROC curve is of interest. We also address practical matters, deriving an expression for the asymptotic variance of the AP, as well as providing real-world examples concerning the evaluation of protein biomarkers for prostate cancer and the assessment of digital versus film mammography for breast cancer screening.