BZPEERReading, trust and collaboration for research
Menu

Discover

GraphFollow connections around a paper, topic or saved view.

Workspaces

HomePick up where your research flow left off.InboxHandle requests, replies and notifications from one place.CollectionsCurate reading lists, evidence sets and shareable dossiers.ResearchSee your private provenance graph, trail and imports.CollaborationMove from discovery into focused discussion rooms.PublishDraft, preview and publish full-text research articles.

Network

ExpertsFind specialists worth following or asking for help.CommunitiesJoin research circles organized around shared work.PartnersSee external organizations active around the same topics.

Opportunities

ListingsBrowse roles, calls and collaborations with clearer fit signals.

Account

Log inReturn to your reading and collaboration workspace.Create accountStart saving work, following people and joining teams.
Log inCreate account

Researcher profile

Xabier García-Martínez

Xabier García-Martínez contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.

ResearcherAffiliation not importedOpen to collaborate
math.RAmath.CTmath.RT

Trust snapshot

Quick read

Trust 21 - Emerging
10works
0followers
3topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Decide how to stay connected

Follow researcher0

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

10 published item(s)

preprint2021arXiv

Algebras with representable representations

Just like group actions are represented by group automorphisms, Lie algebra actions are represented by derivations: up to isomorphism, a split extension of a Lie algebra $B$ by a Lie algebra $X$ corresponds to a Lie algebra morphism $B\to \mathit{Der}(X)$ from $B$ to the Lie algebra $\mathit{Der}(X)$ of derivations on $X$. In this article, we study the question whether the concept of a derivation can be extended to other types of non-associative algebras over a field $\mathbb{K}$, in such a way that these generalised derivations characterise the $\mathbb{K}$-algebra actions. We prove that the answer is no, as soon as the field $\mathbb{K}$ is infinite. In fact, we prove a stronger result: already the representability of all abelian actions -- which are usually called representations or Beck modules -- suffices for this to be true. Thus we characterise the variety of Lie algebras over an infinite field of characteristic different from $2$ as the only variety of non-associative algebras which is a non-abelian category with representable representations. This emphasises the unique role played by the Lie algebra of linear endomorphisms $\mathfrak{gl}(V)$ as a representing object for the representations on a vector space $V$.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2020arXiv

Algebraic exponentiation for Lie algebras

It is known that the category of Lie algebras over a ring admits algebraic exponents. The aim of this paper is to show that the same is true for the category of internal Lie algebras in an additive, cocomplete, symmetric, closed, monoidal category. In this way, we add some new examples to the brief list of known locally algebraically cartesian closed categories, including the categories of Lie superalgebras and differentially graded Lie algebras amongst others.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2016arXiv

A natural extension of the universal enveloping algebra functor to crossed modules of Leibniz algebras

The universal enveloping algebra functor between Leibniz and associative algebras defined by Loday and Pirashvili is extended to crossed modules. We prove that the universal enveloping crossed module of algebras of a crossed module of Leibniz algebras is its natural generalization. Then we construct an isomorphism between the category of representations of a Leibniz crossed module and the category of left modules over its universal enveloping crossed module of algebras. Our approach is particularly interesting since the actor in the category of Leibniz crossed modules does not exist in general, so the technique used in the proof for the Lie case cannot be applied. Finally we move on to the framework of the Loday-Pirashvili category $\mathcal{LM}$ in order to comprehend this universal enveloping crossed module in terms of the Lie crossed modules case.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2016arXiv

A non-abelian exterior product and homology of Leibniz algebras

We introduce a non-abelian exterior product of two crossed modules of Leibniz algebra and investigate its relation to the low dimensional Leibniz homology. Later this non-abelian exterior product is applied to the construction of eight term exact sequence in Leibniz homology. Also its relationship to the universal quadratic functor is established, which is applied to the comparison of the second Lie and Leibniz homologies of a Lie algebra.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2016arXiv

Actor of a crossed module of Leibniz algebras

We extend to the category of crossed modules of Leibniz algebras the notion of biderivation via the action of a Leibniz algebra. This results into a pair of Leibniz algebras which allow us to construct an object which is the actor under certain circumstances. Additionally, we give a description of an action in the category of crossed modules of Leibniz algebras in terms of equations. Finally, we check that, under the aforementioned conditions, the kernel of the canonical map from a crossed module to its actor coincides with the center and we introduce the notions of crossed module of inner and outer biderivations.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2016arXiv

Universal central extensions of superdialgebras of matrices

We complete the problem of finding the universal central extension in the category of Leibniz superalgebras of $\mathfrak{sl}(m, n, D)$ when $m+n \geq 3$ and $D$ is a superdialgebra, solving in particular the problem when $D$ is an associative algebra, superalgebra or dialgebra. To accomplish this task we use a different method than the standard studied in the literature. We introduce and use the non-abelian tensor square of Leibniz superalgebras and its relations with the universal central extension.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2015arXiv

Non-abelian tensor product and homology of Lie Superalgebras

We introduce the non-abelian tensor product of Lie superalgebras, study some of its properties including nilpotency, solvability and Engel, and we use it to describe the universal central extensions of Lie superalgebras. We present the low-dimensional non-abelian homology of Lie superalgebras and establish its relationship with the cyclic homology of associative superalgebras. We also define the non-abelian exterior product and give an analogue of Miller's theorem, Hopf formula and a six-term exact sequence for the homology of Lie superalgebras.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2014arXiv

Universal central extensions of $\mathfrak{sl}(m, n, A)$ of small rank over associative superalgebras

We complete the solution of the problem of finding the universal central extension of the matrix superalgebras $\mathfrak{sl}(m, n, A)$ where $A$ is an associative superalgebra and computing $H_2\big(\mathfrak{sl}(m, n, A)\big)$. The Steinberg Lie superalgebra $\mathfrak{st}(m, n, A)$ has a very important role and we will also find out $H_2\big(\mathfrak{st}(m, n, A)\big)$. In Chen and Sun (arXiv:1311.7079, 2013) it is solved the problem where $m+n \geq 5$ and in Chen and Guay (Algebr. Represent. Theory, 2013) it is solved when $n=0$, so here we work out the three remaining cases $\mathfrak{sl}(2, 1, A), \mathfrak{sl}(3, 1, A)$ and $\mathfrak{sl}(2, 2, A)$.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2014arXiv

Universal central extensions of Lie-Rinehart algebras

In this paper we study the universal central extension of a Lie--Rinehart algebra and we give a description of it. Then we study the lifting of automorphisms and derivations to central extensions. We also give a definition of a non-abelian tensor product in Lie--Rinehart algebras based on the construction of Ellis of non-abelian tensor product of Lie algebras. We relate this non-abelian tensor product to the universal central extension.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access