Researcher profile

William Lefebvre

William Lefebvre contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.

ResearcherAffiliation not importedOpen to collaborate

Trust snapshot

Quick read

Trust 15 - UnverifiedVerification L1Unclaimed author
3works
0followers
3topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Decide how to stay connected

Follow researcher0

Identity and collaboration

How to connect with this researcher

Claiming links this public author record to a researcher profile and unlocks direct collaboration workflows.

Log in to claim

Direct collaboration

Open a focused conversation when the fit is right

Claim this author entity first to unlock direct invitations.

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

3 published item(s)

preprint2022arXiv

Differential learning methods for solving fully nonlinear PDEs

We propose machine learning methods for solving fully nonlinear partial differential equations (PDEs) with convex Hamiltonian. Our algorithms are conducted in two steps. First the PDE is rewritten in its dual stochastic control representation form, and the corresponding optimal feedback control is estimated using a neural network. Next, three different methods are presented to approximate the associated value function, i.e., the solution of the initial PDE, on the entire space-time domain of interest. The proposed deep learning algorithms rely on various loss functions obtained either from regression or pathwise versions of the martingale representation and its differential relation, and compute simultaneously the solution and its derivatives. Compared to existing methods, the addition of a differential loss function associated to the gradient, and augmented training sets with Malliavin derivatives of the forward process, yields a better estimation of the PDE's solution derivatives, in particular of the second derivative, which is usually difficult to approximate. Furthermore, we leverage our methods to design algorithms for solving families of PDEs when varying terminal condition (e.g. option payoff in the context of mathematical finance) by means of the class of DeepOnet neural networks aiming to approximate functional operators. Numerical tests illustrate the accuracy of our methods on the resolution of a fully nonlinear PDE associated to the pricing of options with linear market impact, and on the Merton portfolio selection problem.

preprint2021arXiv

Linear-quadratic stochastic delayed control and deep learning resolution

We consider a class of stochastic control problems with a delayed control, both in drift and diffusion, of the type dX t = $α$ t--d (bdt + $σ$dW t). We provide a new characterization of the solution in terms of a set of Riccati partial differential equations. Existence and uniqueness are obtained under a sufficient condition expressed directly as a relation between the horizon T and the quantity d(b/$σ$) 2. Furthermore, a deep learning scheme is designed and used to illustrate the effect of delay on the Markowitz portfolio allocation problem with execution delay.

preprint2020arXiv

Mean-variance portfolio selection with tracking error penalization

This paper studies a variation of the continuous-time mean-variance portfolio selection where a tracking-error penalization is added to the mean-variance criterion. The tracking error term penalizes the distance between the allocation controls and a reference portfolio with same wealth and fixed weights. Such consideration is motivated as follows: (i) On the one hand, it is a way to robustify the mean-variance allocation in case of misspecified parameters, by "fitting" it to a reference portfolio that can be agnostic to market parameters; (ii) On the other hand, it is a procedure to track a benchmark and improve the Sharpe ratio of the resulting portfolio by considering a mean-variance criterion in the objective function. This problem is formulated as a McKean-Vlasov control problem. We provide explicit solutions for the optimal portfolio strategy and asymptotic expansions of the portfolio strategy and efficient frontier for small values of the tracking error parameter. Finally, we compare the Sharpe ratios obtained by the standard mean-variance allocation and the penalized one for four different reference portfolios: equal-weights, minimum-variance, equal risk contributions and shrinking portfolio. This comparison is done on a simulated misspecified model, and on a backtest performed with historical data. Our results show that in most cases, the penalized portfolio outperforms in terms of Sharpe ratio both the standard mean-variance and the reference portfolio.