Source author record

William L. Matthewson

William L. Matthewson appears in the imported research catalog. Authorship, coauthor and topic links are available while profile ownership is still unclaimed.

ResearcherUnclaimed source record

astro-ph.CO

Catalog footprint

What is connected

2works

1topics

1close collaborators

Actions

Connect this record

Open graph Browse works

Inspect adjacent papers, topics, institutions and collaborators without losing the researcher page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

preprint2022arXiv

Small scale effects in the observable power spectrum at large angular scales

In this paper we show how effects from small scales can enter the angular-redshift power spectrum $C_\ell(z,z')$. In particular, we show that spectroscopic surveys with high redshift resolution are already affected on large angular scales, i.e. at low multipoles, by features from small scales. When considering the angular power spectrum with spectroscopic redshift resolution, it is therefore important to account for non-linearities relevant on small scales, even at low multipoles. This may also motivate the use of the correlation function in relatively wide redshift bins, which is not affected by non-linearities on large scales, instead of the angular power spectrum. The extent to which small-scale effects become visible on large scales, which is more relevant for bin auto-correlations than for cross-correlations, is quantified in detail.

preprint2021arXiv

The Flat Sky Approximation to Galaxy Number Counts

We derive and test an approximation for the angular power spectrum of galaxy number counts in the flat sky limit. The standard density and redshift space distortion (RSD) terms in the resulting approximation are distinct to the Limber approximation, providing an accurate result for multipoles as low as $\ell\simeq10$, where the corresponding Limber approximation is completely inaccurate. At equal redshift the accuracy of the density and RSD (standard) terms is around 0.2% for $z<3$ and 0.5% at $z=5$, even to $\ell<50$. At unequal redshifts, if we consider the total power spectrum, the precision is better than 5% only for very small redshift differences, $δ<δ_0 (\simeq 3.6\times10^{-4}(1+z)^{2.14})$ where the standard terms are well-approximated, or for large enough redshift differences $δ>δ_1 (\simeq 0.33(r(z)H(z))/(z+1))$ where the lensing terms dominate. The flat sky expressions for the pure lensing and the lensing-density cross-correlation terms are equivalent to the Limber approximation. For arbitrary redshift differences, the Limber approximation achieves an accuracy of 0.5% (above $\ell\simeq 40$ for pure lensing and $\ell\simeq 80$ for density-lensing). Besides being very accurate, the flat sky approximation is computationally much simpler and can therefore be very useful for data analysis and forecasts with MCMC methods. This will be particularly crucial for upcoming galaxy surveys that will measure the power spectrum of galaxy number counts.