BZPEERPapers, people, evidence and research paths
Menu

Discover

SearchFind papers, people, topics, institutions and opportunities from one place.GraphSee how papers, authors, topics and evidence connect.

Research tools

HomeContinue from the papers, people and topics that matter now.CollectionsTurn saved papers into reading lists, evidence maps and shareable context.ResearchReconstruct the path that led you from search to paper to question.CollaborationMove from a paper, topic or expert request into a focused thread.PublishCreate full-text research articles with metadata, formulas and versions.

Network

ExpertsFind specialists whose work and reviews explain why they can help.CommunitiesJoin research groups organized around papers, topics and shared evidence.

Opportunities

ListingsBrowse roles, calls and collaborations connected to real research context.

Account

Log inReturn to your saved papers, graph views and active threads.Create accountStart saving papers, building a research trail and joining teams.
Log inCreate account

Source author record

William K. Wootters

William K. Wootters appears in the imported research catalog. Authorship, coauthor and topic links are available while profile ownership is still unclaimed.

ResearcherUnclaimed source record
quant-phmath-phmath.MP

Catalog footprint

What is connected

14works
3topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Connect this record

Log in to claim
Open graphBrowse works

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent papers, topics, institutions and collaborators without losing the researcher page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

14 published item(s)

preprint2022arXiv

A classical formulation of quantum theory?

We explore a particular way of reformulating quantum theory in classical terms, starting with phase space rather than Hilbert space, and with actual probability distributions rather than quasiprobabilities. The classical picture we start with is epistemically restricted, in the spirit of a model introduced by Spekkens. We obtain quantum theory only by combining a collection of restricted classical pictures. Our main challenge in this paper is to find a simple way of characterizing the allowed sets of classical pictures. We present one promising approach to this problem and show how it works out for the case of a single qubit.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2022arXiv

A quantum prediction as a collection of epistemically restricted classical predictions

Spekkens has introduced an epistemically restricted classical theory of discrete systems, based on discrete phase space. The theory manifests a number of quantum-like properties but cannot fully imitate quantum theory because it is noncontextual. In this paper we show how, for a certain class of quantum systems, the quantum description of an experiment can be decomposed into classical descriptions that are epistemically restricted, though in a different sense than in Spekkens' work. For each aspect of the experiment -- the preparation, the transformations, and the measurement -- the epistemic restriction limits the form of the probability distribution an imagined classical observer may use. There are also global constraints that the whole collection of classical descriptions must satisfy. Each classical description generates its own prediction regarding the outcome of the experiment. One recovers the quantum prediction via a simple but highly nonclassical rule: the "nonrandom part" of the predicted quantum probabilities is obtained by summing the nonrandom parts of the classically predicted probabilities. By "nonrandom part" we mean the deviation from complete randomness, that is, from what one would expect upon measuring the fully mixed state.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2015arXiv

Entanglement Sharing in Real-Vector-Space Quantum Theory

The limitation on the sharing of entanglement is a basic feature of quantum theory. For example, if two qubits are completely entangled with each other, neither of them can be at all entangled with any other object. In this paper we show, at least for a certain standard definition of entanglement, that this feature is lost when one replaces the usual complex vector space of quantum states with a real vector space. Moreover, the difference between the two theories is extreme: in the real-vector-space theory, there exist states of arbitrarily many binary objects, "rebits," in which every rebit in the system is maximally entangled with each of the other rebits.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2015arXiv

States that "look the same" with respect to every basis in a mutually unbiased set

A complete set of mutually unbiased bases in a Hilbert space of dimension $d$ defines a set of $d+1$ orthogonal measurements. Relative to such a set, we define a "MUB-balanced state" to be a pure state for which the list of probabilities of the $d$ outcomes of one of these measurements is independent of the choice of measurement, up to permutations. In this paper we explicitly construct a MUB-balanced state for each prime power dimension $d$ for which $d = 3$ (mod 4). These states have already been constructed by Appleby in unpublished notes, but our presentation here is different in that both the expression for the states themselves and the proof of MUB-balancedness are given in terms of the discrete Wigner function, rather than the density matrix or state vector. The discrete Wigner functions of these states are "rotationally symmetric" in a sense roughly analogous to the rotational symmetry of the energy eigenstates of a harmonic oscillator in the continuous two-dimensional phase space. Upon converting the Wigner function to a density matrix, we find that the states are expressible as real state vectors in the standard basis. We observe numerically that when $d$ is large (and not a power of 3), a histogram of the components of such a state vector appears to form a semicircular distribution.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2015arXiv

The rebit three-tangle and its relation to two-qubit entanglement

The three-tangle is a measure of three-way entanglement in a system of three qubits. For a pure state, it can be understood as the residual entanglement not accounted for by pairwise entanglements between individual qubits. Here we define and evaluate the analogous quantity for three rebits (that is, binary systems in the real-amplitude variant of quantum theory). We find that the resulting formula is the same as in the complex case, except that an overall absolute value sign is missing. As a result, the rebit three-tangle can be negative, expressing the possibility of non-monogamous entanglement in real-amplitude quantum theory (for entanglement based on the convex-roof construction). We then relate the entanglement among three rebits to the entanglement of two qubits, by re-expressing the two-qubit state as a three-rebit state in the ubit model.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2014arXiv

Unextendible Mutually Unbiased Bases from Pauli Classes

We provide a construction of sets of (d/2+1) mutually unbiased bases (MUBs) in dimensions d=4,8 using maximal commuting classes of Pauli operators. We show that these incomplete sets cannot be extended further using the operators of the Pauli group. However, specific examples of sets of MUBs obtained using our construction are shown to be strongly unextendible; that is, there does not exist another vector that is unbiased with respect to the elements in the set. We conjecture the existence of such unextendible sets in higher dimensions (d=2^{n}, n>3) as well. Furthermore, we note an interesting connection between these unextendible sets and state-independent proofs of the Kochen-Specker Theorem for two-qubit systems. Our construction also leads to a proof of the tightness of a H_{2} entropic uncertainty relation for any set of three MUBs constructed from Pauli classes in d=4.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2013arXiv

Optimal Information Transfer and Real-Vector-Space Quantum Theory

Consider a photon that has just emerged from a linear polarizing filter. If the photon is then subjected to an orthogonal polarization measurement-e.g., horizontal vs vertical-the photon's preparation cannot be fully expressed in the outcome: a binary outcome cannot reveal the value of a continuous variable. However, a stream of identically prepared photons can do much better. To quantify this effect, one can compute the mutual information between the angle of polarization and the observed frequencies of occurrence of "horizontal" and "vertical." Remarkably, one finds that the quantum-mechanical rule for computing probabilities--Born's rule--maximizes this mutual information relative to other conceivable probability rules. However, the maximization is achieved only because linear polarization can be modeled with a real state space; the argument fails when one considers the full set of complex states. This result generalizes to higher dimensional Hilbert spaces: in every case, one finds that information is transferred optimally from preparation to measurement in the real-vector-space theory but not in the complex theory. Attempts to modify the statement of the problem so as to see a similar optimization in the standard complex theory are not successful (with one limited exception). So it seems that this optimization should be regarded as a special feature of real-vector-space quantum theory.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2013arXiv

Real-Vector-Space Quantum Theory with a Universal Quantum Bit

We explore a model of the world based on real-vector-space quantum theory. In our model the familiar complex phase appearing in quantum states is replaced by a single binary object that we call the ubit, which is not localized and which can interact with any object in the world. Ordinary complex-vector-space quantum theory can be recovered from this model if we simply impose a certain restriction on the sets of allowed measurements and transformations (Stueckelberg's rule), but in this paper we try to obtain the standard theory, or a close approximation to it, without invoking such a restriction. We look particularly at the effective theory that applies to a subsystem when the ubit is interacting with a much larger environment. In a certain limit it turns out that the ubit-environment interaction has the effect of enforcing Stueckelberg's rule automatically, and we obtain a one-parameter family of effective theories--modifications of standard quantum theory--that all satisfy this rule. The one parameter is the ratio s/omega, where s quantifies the strength of the ubit's interaction with the rest of the world and omega is the ubit's rotation rate. We find that when this parameter is small but not zero, the effective theory is similar to standard quantum theory but is characterized by spontaneous decoherence of isolated systems.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2011arXiv

Geometric local invariants and pure three-qubit states

We explore a geometric approach to generating local SU(2) and $SL(2,\mathbb{C})$ invariants for a collection of qubits inspired by lattice gauge theory. Each local invariant or 'gauge' invariant is associated to a distinct closed path (or plaquette) joining some or all of the qubits. In lattice gauge theory, the lattice points are the discrete space-time points, the transformations between the points of the lattice are defined by parallel transporters and the gauge invariant observable associated to a particular closed path is given by the Wilson loop. In our approach the points of the lattice are qubits, the link-transformations between the qubits are defined by the correlations between them and the gauge invariant observable, the local invariants associated to a particular closed path are also given by a Wilson loop-like construction. The link transformations share many of the properties of parallel transporters although they are not undone when one retraces one's steps through the lattice. This feature is used to generate many of the invariants. We consider a pure three qubit state as a test case and find we can generate a complete set of algebraically independent local invariants in this way, however the framework given here is applicable to mixed states composed of any number of $d$ level quantum systems. We give an operational interpretation of these invariants in terms of observables.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2010arXiv

Entanglement and Composite Bosons

We build upon work by C. K. Law [Phys. Rev. A 71, 034306 (2005)] to show in general that the entanglement between two fermions largely determines the extent to which the pair behaves like an elementary boson. Specifically, we derive upper and lower bounds on a quantity that governs the bosonic character of a pair of fermions when N such pairs approximately share the same wavefunction. Our bounds depend on the purity of the single-particle density matrix, an indicator of entanglement, and demonstrate that if the entanglement is sufficiently strong, the quantity in question approaches its ideal bosonic value.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2010arXiv

Entanglement cost of two-qubit orthogonal measurements

The "entanglement cost" of a bipartite measurement is the amount of shared entanglement two participants need to use up in order to carry out the given measurement by means of local operations and classical communication. Here we numerically investigate the entanglement cost of generic orthogonal measurements on two qubits. Our results strongly suggest that for almost all measurements of this kind, the entanglement cost is strictly greater than the average entanglement of the eigenstates associated with the measurements, implying that the nonseparability of a two-qubit orthogonal measurement is generically distinct from the nonseparability of its eigenstates.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2010arXiv

Limited Holism and Real-Vector-Space Quantum Theory

Quantum theory has the property of "local tomography": the state of any composite system can be reconstructed from the statistics of measurements on the individual components. In this respect the holism of quantum theory is limited. We consider in this paper a class of theories more holistic than quantum theory in that they are constrained only by "bilocal tomography": the state of any composite system is determined by the statistics of measurements on pairs of components. Under a few auxiliary assumptions, we derive certain general features of such theories. In particular, we show how the number of state parameters can depend on the number of perfectly distinguishable states. We also show that real-vector-space quantum theory, while not locally tomographic, is bilocally tomographic.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2009arXiv

Entanglement Cost of Nonlocal Measurements

For certain joint measurements on a pair of spatially separated particles, we ask how much entanglement is needed to carry out the measurement exactly. For a class of orthogonal measurements on two qubits with partially entangled eigenstates, we present upper and lower bounds on the entanglement cost. The upper bound is based on a recent result by D. Berry [Phys. Rev. A 75, 032349 (2007)]. The lower bound, based on the entanglement production capacity of the measurement, implies that for almost all measurements in the class we consider, the entanglement required to perform the measurement is strictly greater than the average entanglement of its eigenstates. On the other hand, we show that for any complete measurement in d x d dimensions that is invariant under all local Pauli operations, the cost of the measurement is exactly equal to the average entanglement of the states associated with the outcomes.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2001arXiv

Entanglement sharing among qudits

Consider a system consisting of n d-dimensional quantum particles (qudits), and suppose that we want to optimize the entanglement between each pair. One can ask the following basic question regarding the sharing of entanglement: what is the largest possible value Emax(n,d) of the minimum entanglement between any two particles in the system? (Here we take the entanglement of formation as our measure of entanglement.) For n=3 and d=2, that is, for a system of three qubits, the answer is known: Emax(3,2) = 0.550. In this paper we consider first a system of d qudits and show that Emax(d,d) is greater than or equal to 1. We then consider a system of three particles, with three different values of d. Our results for the three-particle case suggest that as the dimension d increases, the particles can share a greater fraction of their entanglement capacity.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access