Researcher profile

William F. Eddy

William F. Eddy contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.

ResearcherAffiliation not importedOpen to collaborate

Trust snapshot

Quick read

Trust 13 - UnverifiedVerification L1Unclaimed author
2works
0followers
3topics
3close collaborators

Actions

Decide how to stay connected

Follow researcher0

Identity and collaboration

How to connect with this researcher

Claiming links this public author record to a researcher profile and unlocks direct collaboration workflows.

Log in to claim

Direct collaboration

Open a focused conversation when the fit is right

Claim this author entity first to unlock direct invitations.

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

2 published item(s)

preprint2020arXiv

Automatically matching topographical measurements of cartridge cases using a record linkage framework

Firing a gun leaves marks on cartridge cases which purportedly uniquely identify the gun. Firearms examiners typically use a visual examination to evaluate if two cartridge cases were fired from the same gun, and this is a subjective process that has come under scrutiny. Matching can be done in a more reproducible manner using automated algorithms. In this paper, we develop methodology to compare topographical measurements of cartridge cases. We demonstrate the use of a record linkage framework in this context. We compare performance using topographical measurements to older reflectance microscopy images, investigating the extent to which the former produce more accurate comparisons. Using a diverse collection of images of over 1,100 cartridge cases, we find that overall performance is generally improved using topographical data. Some subsets of the data achieve almost perfect predictive performance in terms of precision and recall, while some produce extremely poor performance. Further work needs to be done to assess if examiners face similar difficulties on certain gun and ammunition combinations. For automatic methods, a fuller investigation into their fairness and robustness is necessary before they can be deployed in practice.

preprint2020arXiv

Exploring the nuances of R0: Eight estimates and application to 2009 pandemic influenza

For nearly a century, the initial reproduction number (R0) has been used as a one number summary to compare outbreaks of infectious disease, yet there is no `standard' estimator for R0. Difficulties in estimating R0 arise both from how a disease transmits through a population as well as from differences in statistical estimation method. We describe eight methods used to estimate R0 and provide a thorough simulation study of how these estimates change in the presence of different disease parameters. As motivation, we analyze the 2009 outbreak of the H1N1 pandemic influenza in the USA and compare the results from our eight methods to a previous study. We discuss the most important aspects from our results which effect the estimation of R0, which include the population size, time period used, and the initial percent of infectious individuals. Additionally, we discuss how pre-processing incidence counts may effect estimates of R0. Finally, we provide guidelines for estimating point estimates and confidence intervals to create reliable, comparable estimates of R0.