BZPEERReading, trust and collaboration for research
Menu

Discover

GraphFollow connections around a paper, topic or saved view.

Workspaces

HomePick up where your research flow left off.InboxHandle requests, replies and notifications from one place.CollectionsCurate reading lists, evidence sets and shareable dossiers.ResearchSee your private provenance graph, trail and imports.CollaborationMove from discovery into focused discussion rooms.PublishDraft, preview and publish full-text research articles.

Network

ExpertsFind specialists worth following or asking for help.CommunitiesJoin research circles organized around shared work.PartnersSee external organizations active around the same topics.

Opportunities

ListingsBrowse roles, calls and collaborations with clearer fit signals.

Account

Log inReturn to your reading and collaboration workspace.Create accountStart saving work, following people and joining teams.
Log inCreate account

Researcher profile

Wilko van Hoek

Wilko van Hoek contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.

ResearcherAffiliation not importedOpen to collaborate
Information RetrievalDigital LibrariesHuman-Computer Interaction

Trust snapshot

Quick read

Trust 21 - EmergingVerification L1Unclaimed author
6works
0followers
3topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Decide how to stay connected

Follow researcher0

Identity and collaboration

How to connect with this researcher

Claiming links this public author record to a researcher profile and unlocks direct collaboration workflows.

Log in to claim

Direct collaboration

Open a focused conversation when the fit is right

Claim this author entity first to unlock direct invitations.

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

6 published item(s)

preprint2015arXiv

WHOSE - A Tool for Whole-Session Analysis in IIR

One of the main challenges in Interactive Information Retrieval (IIR) evaluation is the development and application of re-usable tools that allow researchers to analyze search behavior of real users in different environments and different domains, but with comparable results. Furthermore, IIR recently focuses more on the analysis of whole sessions, which includes all user interactions that are carried out within a session but also across several sessions by the same user. Some frameworks have already been proposed for the evaluation of controlled experiments in IIR, but yet no framework is available for interactive evaluation of search behavior from real-world information retrieval (IR) systems with real users. In this paper we present a framework for whole-session evaluation that can also utilize these uncontrolled data sets. The logging component can easily be integrated into real-world IR systems for generating and analyzing new log data. Furthermore, due to a supplementary mapping it is also possible to analyze existing log data. For every IR system different actions and filters can be defined. This allows system operators and researchers to use the framework for the analysis of user search behavior in their IR systems and to compare it with others. Using a graphical user interface they have the possibility to interactively explore the data set from a broad overview down to individual sessions.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2014arXiv

Identifying User Behavior in domain-specific Repositories

This paper presents an analysis of the user behavior of two different domain-specific repositories. The web analytic tool etracker was used to gain a first overall insight into the user behavior of these repositories. Moreover, we extended our work to describe an apache web log analysis approach which focuses on the identification of the user behavior. Therefore the user traffic within our systems is visualized using chord diagrams. We could find that recommendations are used frequently and users do rarely combine searching with faceting or filtering.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2014arXiv

Is Evaluating Visual Search Interfaces in Digital Libraries Still an Issue?

Although various visual interfaces for digital libraries have been developed in prototypical systems, very few of these visual approaches have been integrated into today's digital libraries. In this position paper we argue that this is most likely due to the fact that the evaluation results of most visual systems lack comparability. There is no fix standard on how to evaluate visual interactive user interfaces. Therefore it is not possible to identify which approach is more suitable for a certain context. We feel that the comparability of evaluation results could be improved by building a common evaluation setup consisting of a reference system, based on a standardized corpus with fixed tasks and a panel for possible participants.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2013arXiv

Assessing Visualization Techniques for the Search Process in Digital Libraries

In this paper we present an overview of several visualization techniques to support the search process in Digital Libraries (DLs). The search process typically can be separated into three major phases: query formulation and refinement, browsing through result lists and viewing and interacting with documents and their properties. We discuss a selection of popular visualization techniques that have been developed for the different phases to support the user during the search process. Along prototypes based on the different techniques we show how the approaches have been implemented. Although various visualizations have been developed in prototypical systems very few of these approaches have been adapted into today's DLs. We conclude that this is most likely due to the fact that most systems are not evaluated intensely in real-life scenarios with real information seekers and that results of the interesting visualization techniques are often not comparable. We can say that many of the assessed systems did not properly address the information need of cur-rent users.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2013arXiv

Developing a Visual Interactive Search History Exploration System

As users advance in their search within a system, different queries are conducted and various results are examined by them. These objects form an implicit individual library representing the acquired knowledge. In our research we aim to supply the user with visualizations of the search history and interaction methods to organize the history. The fundamental question is what role search history exploration can play in the users search process. In this paper we want to introduce Ideas of a prototypical system for search history exploration and discuss methods to address the questions mentioned above.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2012arXiv

Building Custom Term Suggestion Web Services with OAI-Harvested Open Data

The problem that the same information need can be expressed in a variety of ways is especially true for scientific literature. Each scientific discipline has its own domain-specific language and vocabulary. This language is coded into documentary tools like thesauri or classifications that are used to document and describe scientific documents. When we think of information retrieval as "fundamentally a linguistic process" (Blair, 2003) users have to be aware of the most relevant search terms - which are the controlled thesauri terms the documents are described with. This can be achieved with so-called search-term-recommenders (STR) that map free search terms of a lay user to controlled vocabulary terms which can then be used as a term suggestion or to do an automatic query expansion (Hienert, Schaer, Schaible, & Mayr, 2011). State-of-the-art repository software systems like DSpace or EPrints already offer some kind of term suggestion features in search or input forms but these implementations only work as simple auto completion mechanisms that don't incorporate any kind of semantic mapping. Such software systems would gain a lot in terms of usability and data consistency if tools like the proposed domain-specific STRs would be freely available. We aim to implement a rich toolbox of web services (like the mentioned domain-specific STRs) to support users and providers of online Digital Library (DL) or repository systems.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access