Source author record

Wenmeng Zhang

Explore this author’s publications, collaborators and research topics. This catalog record has not been claimed by its author.

ResearcherUnclaimed source record

Catalog footprint

Research overview

2works
1topics
2close collaborators

Published work

2 publications

preprint2013arXiv

Sharp regularity of linearization for C1,1C^{1,1} hyperbolic diffeomorphisms

C1C^1 linearization is of special significance because it preserves smooth dynamical behaviors and distinguishes qualitative properties in characteristic directions. However, C1C^1 smoothness is not enough to guarantee C1C^1 linearization. For C1,1C^{1,1} hyperbolic diffeomorphisms on Banach spaces C1C^1 linearization was proved under a gap condition together with a band condition of the spectrum. In this paper, the result of C1C^1 linearization in Banach spaces is strengthened to C1,βC^{1,β} linearization with a constant β>0β>0 under a weaker band condition by a decomposition with invariant foliations. The weaker band condition allows the spectrum to be a union of more than two but finitely many bands but restricts those bands to be bounded by a number depending on the supremum of contractive spectrum and the infimum of expansive spectrum. Furthermore, we give an estimate for the exponent ββ and prove that the estimate is sharp in the planar case.

preprint2013arXiv

Sharpness for C1C^1 linearization of planar hyperbolic diffeomorphisms

Planar hyperbolic diffeomorphisms can be referred to two cases: Poincaré domain (both eigenvalues lie inside the unit circle S1S^1) and Siegel domain (one eigenvalue inside S1S^1 but the other outside S1S^1). In Poincaré domain it was proved that C1,αC^{1,α} smoothness with α0:=1−log⁡∣λ2∣/log⁡∣λ1∣<α≤1α_0:=1-\log|λ_2|/\log|λ_1|<α\le 1, where λ1λ_1 and λ2λ_2 are both eigenvalues such that 0<∣λ1∣<∣λ2∣<10<|λ_1|<|λ_2|<1, admits C1C^1 linearization and the linearization is actually C1,βC^{1,β}. While a sharp Hölder exponent β>0β>0 is given, an interesting problem is: Is the exponent α0α_0 also sharp? On the other hand, in Siegel domain we only know that C1,αC^{1,α} smoothness with α∈(0,1]α\in (0,1] admits C1C^1 linearization. In this paper we further study the sharpness for C1C^1 linearization in both cases.

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent papers, topics, institutions and collaborators without losing the researcher page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.