BZPEERPapers, people, evidence and research paths
Menu

Discover

SearchFind papers, people, topics, institutions and opportunities from one place.GraphSee how papers, authors, topics and evidence connect.

Research tools

HomeContinue from the papers, people and topics that matter now.CollectionsTurn saved papers into reading lists, evidence maps and shareable context.ResearchReconstruct the path that led you from search to paper to question.CollaborationMove from a paper, topic or expert request into a focused thread.PublishCreate full-text research articles with metadata, formulas and versions.

Network

ExpertsFind specialists whose work and reviews explain why they can help.CommunitiesJoin research groups organized around papers, topics and shared evidence.

Opportunities

ListingsBrowse roles, calls and collaborations connected to real research context.

Account

Log inReturn to your saved papers, graph views and active threads.Create accountStart saving papers, building a research trail and joining teams.
Log inCreate account

Source author record

Wael Mahboub

Wael Mahboub appears in the imported research catalog. Authorship, coauthor and topic links are available while profile ownership is still unclaimed.

ResearcherUnclaimed source record
math.ACmath.AG

Catalog footprint

What is connected

3works
2topics
3close collaborators

Actions

Connect this record

Log in to claim
Open graphBrowse works

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent papers, topics, institutions and collaborators without losing the researcher page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

3 published item(s)

preprint2020arXiv

On common extensions of valued fields

Given a valuation $v$ on a field $K$, an extension $\bar{v}$ to an algebraic closure and an extension $w$ to $K(X)$. We want to study the common extensions of $\bar{v}$ and $w$ to $\bar{K}(X)$. First we give a detailed link between the minimal pairs notion and the key polynomials notion. Then we prove that in the case when $w$ is a transcendental extension, then any sequence of key polynomials admits a maximal element, and in case this sequence does not contain a limit key polynomial, then any root of the last key polynomial, describe a common extension.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2016arXiv

Abstract key polynomials and comparison theorems with the key polynomials of Mac Lane -- Vaquie

Let $ι:(K,ν)\hookrightarrow(K(x),μ)$ be a simple purely transcendental extension of valued fields. In order to study such an extension, M. Vaquié, generalizing an earlier construction of S. Mac Lane, introduced the notion of Key polynomials. In this paper we define a related notion of \textbf{abstract key polynomials} associated to $ι$ and study the relationship between them and key polynomials of Mac Lane -- Vaquié. Associated to each abstract key polynomial $Q$, we define the truncation $μ_{Q}$ of $μ$ with respect to $Q$ and we study the properties of those truncations. Roughly speaking, $μ_{Q}$ is an approximation to $μ$ defined by the key polynomial $Q$. We also define the notion of an abstract key polynomial $Q'$ being an \textbf{immediate successor} of another abstract key polynomial $Q$ (in this situation we write $Q<Q'$). The main comparison results proved in this paper are as follows:(1): An abstract key polynomial for $μ$ is a Mac Lane -- Vaquié key polynomial for the truncated valuation $μ_{Q}$.(2): If $Q<Q'$ are two abstract key polynomials for $μ$ then $Q'$ is a Mac Lane -- Vaquié key polynomial for $μ_{Q}$. (3) which, for a monic polynomial $Q\in K[x]$ and a valuation $μ'$ of $K(x)$, gives a sufficient condition for $Q$ to be an abstract key polynomial for $μ'$. Combined with an earlier result of M. Vaquié, this describes a class of pairs of valuations $(μ,μ')$ such that $Q$ is a Mac Lane -- Vaquié key polynomial for $μ$ and an abstract key polynomial for $μ'$.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2012arXiv

Key Polynomials

The notion of key polynomials was first introduced in 1936 by S. Maclane in the case of discrete rank 1 valuations. . Let K -> L be a field extension and ν a valuation of K. The original motivation for introducing key polynomials was the problem of describing all the extensions μ of ν to L. Take a valuation μ of L extending the valuation ν. In the case when ν is discrete of rank 1 and L is a simple algebraic extension of K Maclane introduced the notions of key polynomials for μ and augmented valuations and proved that μ is obtained as a limit of a family of augmented valuations on the polynomial ring K[x]. In a series of papers, M. Vaquié generalized MacLane's notion of key polynomials to the case of arbitrary valuations ν (that is, valuations which are not necessarily discrete of rank 1). In the paper Valuations in algebraic field extensions, published in the Journal of Algebra in 2007, F.J. Herrera Govantes, M.A. Olalla Acosta and M. Spivakovsky develop their own notion of key polynomials for extensions (K, ν) -> (L, μ) of valued fields, where ν is of archimedian rank 1 (not necessarily discrete) and give an explicit description of the limit key polynomials. Our purpose in this paper is to clarify the relationship between the two notions of key polynomials already developed by vaquié and by F.J. Herrera Govantes, M.A. Olalla Acosta and M. Spivakovsky.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access