Source author record

Wael Elkamhawy

Explore this author’s publications, collaborators and research topics. This catalog record has not been claimed by its author.

ResearcherUnclaimed source record

Catalog footprint

Research overview

2works
2topics
3close collaborators

Published work

2 publications

preprint2022arXiv

Halo EFT for 31^{31}Ne in a spherical formalism

We calculate the electromagnetic properties of the deformed one-neutron halo candidate 31^{31}Ne using Halo Effective Field Theory (Halo EFT). In this framework, 31^{31}Ne is bound via a resonant PP-wave interaction between the 30^{30}Ne core and the valence neutron. We set up a spherical formalism for 31^{31}Ne in order to calculate the electromagnetic form factors and the E1-breakup strength distribution into the 30^{30}Ne-neutron continuum at leading order in Halo EFT. The associated uncertainties are estimated according to our power counting. In particular, we assume that the deformation of the 30^{30}Ne core enters at next-to-leading order. It can be accounted for by including the JP=2+J^P=2^+ excited state of 30^{30}Ne as an explicit field in the effective Lagrangian.

preprint2016arXiv

Consistent parameter fixing in the quark-meson model with vacuum fluctuations

We revisit the renormalization prescription for the quark-meson model in an extended mean-field approximation, where vacuum quark fluctuations are included. At a given cutoff scale the model parameters are fixed by fitting vacuum quantities, typically including the sigma-meson mass mσm_σ and the pion decay constant fπf_π. In most publications the latter is identified with the expectation value of the sigma field, while for mσm_σ the curvature mass is taken. When quark loops are included, this prescription is however inconsistent, and the correct identification involves the renormalized pion decay constant and the sigma pole mass. In the present article we investigate the influence of the parameter-fixing scheme on the phase structure of the model at finite temperature and chemical potential. Despite large differences between the model parameters in the two schemes, we find that in homogeneous matter the effect on the phase diagram is relatively small. For inhomogeneous phases, on the other hand, the choice of the proper renormalization prescription is crucial. In particular, we show that if renormalization effects on the pion decay constant are not considered, the model does not even present a well-defined renormalized limit when the cutoff is sent to infinity.

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent papers, topics, institutions and collaborators without losing the researcher page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.