Source author record

W. W. Tan

Explore this author’s publications, collaborators and research topics. This catalog record has not been claimed by its author.

ResearcherUnclaimed source record

Catalog footprint

Research overview

2works
2topics
2close collaborators

Published work

2 publications

preprint2016arXiv

Constraining warm dark matter mass with cosmic reionization and gravitational wave

We constrain the warm dark matter (WDM) particle mass with the observations of cosmic reionization and CMB optical depth. We suggest that the GWs from stellar mass black holes (BHs) could give a further constraint on WDM particle mass for future observations. The star formation rates (SFRs) of Population I/II (Pop I/II) and Population III (Pop III) stars are also derived. If the metallicity of the universe have been enriched beyond the critical value of Zcrit=10−3.5Z⊙Z_{\rm crit}=10^{-3.5}Z_{\odot}, the star formation shift from Pop III to Pop I/II stars. Our results show that the SFRs are quite dependent on the WDM particle mass, especially at high redshifts. Combing with the reionization history and CMB optical depth derived from the recent \emph{Planck} mission, we find that the current data requires the WDM particle mass in a narrow range of 1<mx<31 < m_x < 3 keV. Furthermore, we suggest that the stochastic gravitational wave background (SGWB) produced by stellar BHs could give a further constraint on the WDM particle mass for future observations. For mx=3m_{x}=3 keV with Salpeter (Chabrier) initial mass function (IMF), the SGWB from Pop I/II BHs has a peak amplitude of ΩGW≈2.8×10−9 (5.0×10−9)Ω_{\rm GW}\approx2.8\times 10^{-9}~(5.0\times 10^{-9}) at f=316Hzf= 316 {\rm Hz}, while the GW radiation at f<10f<10Hz is seriously suppressed. For mx=1m_{\rm x}=1 keV, the SGWB peak amplitude is the same as that of mx=1m_{\rm x}=1 keV, but a little lower at low frequencies. Therefore, it is hard to constrain the WDM particle mass by the SGWB from Pop I/II BHs. To assess the detectability of GW signal, we also calculate the signal to noise ratio (SNR), which are SNR=37.7 (66.5)\rm SNR=37.7~ (66.5) and 27 (47.7)27~(47.7) for mx=3m_{\rm x}=3 keV and mx=1m_{\rm x}=1 keV for Einstein Telescope (ET) with Salpeter (Chabrier) IMF, respectively.

preprint2015arXiv

Research on the redshift evolution of luminosity function and selection effect of GRBs

We study the redshift evolution of the luminosity function (LF) and redshift selection effect of long gamma-ray bursts (LGRBs). The method is to fit the observed peak flux and redshift distributions, simultaneously. To account for the complex triggering algorithm of Swift, we use a flux triggering efficiency function. We find evidence supporting an evolving LF, where the break luminosity scales as Lb∝(1+z)τL_b\propto (1+z)^τ, with τ=3.5−0.2+0.4τ=3.5^{+0.4}_{-0.2} and τ=0.8−0.08+0.1τ=0.8^{+0.1}_{-0.08} for two kind of LGRB rate models. The corresponding local GRB rates are $\dot{R}(0)=0.86^{+0.11}_{-0.08} \yr^{-1}\Gpc^{-3}$ and $\dot{R}(0)= 0.54^{+0.25}_{-0.07} \yr^{-1}\Gpc^{-3}$, respectively. Furthermore, by comparing the redshift distribution between the observed one and our mocked one, we find that the redshift detection efficiency of the flux triggered GRBs decreases with redshift. Especially, a great number of GRBs miss their redshifts in the redshift range of 1<z<2.51<z<2.5, where "redshift desert" effect may be dominated. More interestingly, our results show that the "redshift desert" effect is mainly introduced by the dimmer GRBs, e.g., $P<10^{-7}\ergs /\s/\cm^2$, but has no effect on the brighter GRBs.

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent papers, topics, institutions and collaborators without losing the researcher page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.