BZPEERPapers, people, evidence and research pathsDiscover
Research tools
Network
Opportunities
Account
Source author record
W. Hugh Woodin appears in the imported research catalog. Authorship, coauthor and topic links are available while profile ownership is still unclaimed.
Catalog footprint
Research graph
Inspect adjacent papers, topics, institutions and collaborators without losing the researcher page.
BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.
Published work
Assume $\mathsf{ZF}+\mathsf{AD}+V=L(\mathbb{R})$ and let $κ<Θ$ be an uncountable cardinal. We show that $κ$ is Jónsson, and that if $\mathrm{cof}(κ)=ω$ then $κ$ is Rowbottom. We also establish some other partition properties.
An optimal extension of the Jensen covering lemma, within the limits imposed by Prikry forcing, is proved. If L[E] is an "iterable" weasel with no measurable cardinals, then either L[E] has "indiscernibles", or every uncountable set of ordinals is contained in a set in L[E] of the same cardinality. (The terms "iterable" and "indiscernibles" are made precise in the paper.) Most importantly, there is no hypothesis explicitly limiting the large cardinals which are consistent in L[E].
We show that the supremum of the lengths of boldface Delta-1-2 prewellorderings of the reals can be Aleph-2, with Aleph-1 inac- cessible to reals, assuming only the consistency of an inaccessible.
The usual definition of the set of constructible reals is $Σ^1_2$. This set can have a simpler definition if, for example, it is countable or if every real is constructible. H. Friedman asked if the set of constructible reals can be analytic or even Borel in a nontrivial way. A related problem was posed by K. Prikry: can there exist a nonconstructible perfect set of constructible reals? The main result of this paper is a negative answer to Friedman's question. In fact we prove that if $M$ is an inner model of set theory and the set of reals in $M$ is analytic then either all reals are in $M$ or else $\aleph _1^M$ is countable. We also extend this result to higher levels of the projective hierarchy under appropriate large cardinal assumptions. Concerning Prikry's problem we show that the answer is negative if "perfect" is replaced by "superperfect" but that it can be positive if "constructible" is replaced by "belonging to some inner model $M$".