BZPEERPapers, people, evidence and research paths
Menu

Discover

SearchFind papers, people, topics, institutions and opportunities from one place.GraphSee how papers, authors, topics and evidence connect.

Research tools

HomeContinue from the papers, people and topics that matter now.CollectionsTurn saved papers into reading lists, evidence maps and shareable context.ResearchReconstruct the path that led you from search to paper to question.CollaborationMove from a paper, topic or expert request into a focused thread.PublishCreate full-text research articles with metadata, formulas and versions.

Network

ExpertsFind specialists whose work and reviews explain why they can help.CommunitiesJoin research groups organized around papers, topics and shared evidence.

Opportunities

ListingsBrowse roles, calls and collaborations connected to real research context.

Account

Log inReturn to your saved papers, graph views and active threads.Create accountStart saving papers, building a research trail and joining teams.
Log inCreate account

Source author record

Vu H. N. Phan

Vu H. N. Phan appears in the imported research catalog. Authorship, coauthor and topic links are available while profile ownership is still unclaimed.

ResearcherUnclaimed source record
Artificial IntelligenceData Structures and AlgorithmsLogic in Computer Science

Catalog footprint

What is connected

4works
3topics
2close collaborators

Actions

Connect this record

Log in to claim
Open graphBrowse works

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent papers, topics, institutions and collaborators without losing the researcher page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

4 published item(s)

preprint2022arXiv

DPER: Dynamic Programming for Exist-Random Stochastic SAT

In Bayesian inference, the maximum a posteriori (MAP) problem combines the most probable explanation (MPE) and marginalization (MAR) problems. The counterpart in propositional logic is the exist-random stochastic satisfiability (ER-SSAT) problem, which combines the satisfiability (SAT) and weighted model counting (WMC) problems. Both MAP and ER-SSAT have the form $\operatorname{argmax}_X \sum_Y f(X, Y)$, where $f$ is a real-valued function over disjoint sets $X$ and $Y$ of variables. These two optimization problems request a value assignment for the $X$ variables that maximizes the weighted sum of $f(X, Y)$ over all value assignments for the $Y$ variables. ER-SSAT has been shown to be a promising approach to formally verify fairness in supervised learning. Recently, dynamic programming on graded project-join trees has been proposed to solve weighted projected model counting (WPMC), a related problem that has the form $\sum_X \max_Y f(X, Y)$. We extend this WPMC framework to exactly solve ER-SSAT and implement a dynamic-programming solver named DPER. Our empirical evaluation indicates that DPER contributes to the portfolio of state-of-the-art ER-SSAT solvers (DC-SSAT and erSSAT) through competitive performance on low-width problem instances.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2022arXiv

DPO: Dynamic-Programming Optimization on Hybrid Constraints

In Bayesian inference, the most probable explanation (MPE) problem requests a variable instantiation with the highest probability given some evidence. Since a Bayesian network can be encoded as a literal-weighted CNF formula $φ$, we study Boolean MPE, a more general problem that requests a model $τ$ of $φ$ with the highest weight, where the weight of $τ$ is the product of weights of literals satisfied by $τ$. It is known that Boolean MPE can be solved via reduction to (weighted partial) MaxSAT. Recent work proposed DPMC, a dynamic-programming model counter that leverages graph-decomposition techniques to construct project-join trees. A project-join tree is an execution plan that specifies how to conjoin clauses and project out variables. We build on DPMC and introduce DPO, a dynamic-programming optimizer that exactly solves Boolean MPE. By using algebraic decision diagrams (ADDs) to represent pseudo-Boolean (PB) functions, DPO is able to handle disjunctive clauses as well as XOR clauses. (Cardinality constraints and PB constraints may also be compactly represented by ADDs, so one can further extend DPO's support for hybrid inputs.) To test the competitiveness of DPO, we generate random XOR-CNF formulas. On these hybrid benchmarks, DPO significantly outperforms MaxHS, UWrMaxSat, and GaussMaxHS, which are state-of-the-art exact solvers for MaxSAT.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2020arXiv

ADDMC: Weighted Model Counting with Algebraic Decision Diagrams

We present an algorithm to compute exact literal-weighted model counts of Boolean formulas in Conjunctive Normal Form. Our algorithm employs dynamic programming and uses Algebraic Decision Diagrams as the primary data structure. We implement this technique in ADDMC, a new model counter. We empirically evaluate various heuristics that can be used with ADDMC. We then compare ADDMC to state-of-the-art exact weighted model counters (Cachet, c2d, d4, and miniC2D) on 1914 standard model counting benchmarks and show that ADDMC significantly improves the virtual best solver.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2020arXiv

DPMC: Weighted Model Counting by Dynamic Programming on Project-Join Trees

We propose a unifying dynamic-programming framework to compute exact literal-weighted model counts of formulas in conjunctive normal form. At the center of our framework are project-join trees, which specify efficient project-join orders to apply additive projections (variable eliminations) and joins (clause multiplications). In this framework, model counting is performed in two phases. First, the planning phase constructs a project-join tree from a formula. Second, the execution phase computes the model count of the formula, employing dynamic programming as guided by the project-join tree. We empirically evaluate various methods for the planning phase and compare constraint-satisfaction heuristics with tree-decomposition tools. We also investigate the performance of different data structures for the execution phase and compare algebraic decision diagrams with tensors. We show that our dynamic-programming model-counting framework DPMC is competitive with the state-of-the-art exact weighted model counters cachet, c2d, d4, and miniC2D.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access