BZPEERReading, trust and collaboration for research
Menu

Discover

GraphFollow connections around a paper, topic or saved view.

Workspaces

HomePick up where your research flow left off.InboxHandle requests, replies and notifications from one place.CollectionsCurate reading lists, evidence sets and shareable dossiers.ResearchSee your private provenance graph, trail and imports.CollaborationMove from discovery into focused discussion rooms.PublishDraft, preview and publish full-text research articles.

Network

ExpertsFind specialists worth following or asking for help.CommunitiesJoin research circles organized around shared work.PartnersSee external organizations active around the same topics.

Opportunities

ListingsBrowse roles, calls and collaborations with clearer fit signals.

Account

Log inReturn to your reading and collaboration workspace.Create accountStart saving work, following people and joining teams.
Log inCreate account

Researcher profile

Volker Hohmann

Volker Hohmann contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.

ResearcherAffiliation not importedOpen to collaborate
Soundeess.ASphysics.med-pheess.SPHuman-Computer InteractionNeurons and Cognition

Trust snapshot

Quick read

Trust 21 - Emerging
7works
0followers
6topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Decide how to stay connected

Follow researcher0

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

7 published item(s)

preprint2023arXiv

Comparison of a Head-Mounted Display and a Curved Screen in a Multi-Talker Audiovisual Listening Task

Introduction: Virtual audiovisual technology and its methodology has yet to be established for psychoacoustic research. This study examined the effects of different audiovisual conditions on preference when listening to multi-talker conversations. The study's goal is to explore and assess audiovisual technologies in the context of hearing research. Methods: The participants listened to audiovisual conversations between four talkers. Two displays were tested and compared: a curved screen (CS) and a head-mounted display (HMD). Using three visual conditions (audio-only, virtual characters and video recordings), three groups of participants were tested: seventeen young normal-hearing, ten older normal-hearing, and ten older hearing-impaired listeners. Results: Open interviews showed that the CS was preferred over the HMD for older normal-hearing participants and that video recordings were the preferred visual condition. Young and older hearing-impaired participants did not show a preference between the CS and the HMD. Conclusions: CSs and video recordings should be the preferred audiovisual setup of laboratories and clinics, although HMDs and virtual characters can be used for hearing research when necessary and suitable.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2022arXiv

Open community platform for hearing aid algorithm research: open Master Hearing Aid (openMHA)

open Master Hearing Aid (openMHA) was developed and provided to the hearing aid research community as an open-source software platform with the aim to support sustainable and reproducible research towards improvement and new types of assistive hearing systems not limited by proprietary software. The software offers a flexible framework that allows the users to conduct hearing aid research using tools and a number of signal processing plugins provided with the software as well as the implementation of own methods. The openMHA software is independent of a specific hardware and supports Linux, macOS and Windows operating systems as well as 32-bit and 64-bit ARM-based architectures such as used in small portable integrated systems. www.openmha.org

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2022arXiv

Vehicle Noise: Comparison of Loudness Ratings in the Field and the Laboratory

Objective: Distorted loudness perception is one of the main complaints of hearing aid users. Being able to measure loudness perception correctly in the clinic is essential for fitting hearing aids. For this, experiments in the clinic should be able to reflect and capture loudness perception as in everyday-life situations. Little research has been done comparing loudness perception in the field and in the laboratory. Design: Participants rated the loudness in the field and in the laboratory of 36 driving actions done by four different vehicles. The field measurements were done in a restricted street and recorded with a 360deg camera and a tetrahedral microphone. The recorded stimuli, which are openly accessible, were presented in three different conditions in the laboratory: 360deg video recordings with a head-mounted display, video recordings with a desktop monitor, and audio-only. Sample: Thirteen normal-hearing participants and 18 hearing-impaired participants participated in the study. Results: The driving actions were rated significantly louder in the laboratory than in the field for the audio-only condition. These loudness rating differences were bigger for louder sounds in two laboratory conditions, i.e., the higher the sound level of a driving action was the more likely it was to be rated louder in the laboratory. There were no significant differences in the loudness ratings between the three laboratory conditions and between groups. Conclusions: The results of this experiment further remark the importance of increasing the realism and immersion when measuring loudness in the clinic.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2021arXiv

Interaction of hearing aids with self-motion and the influence of hearing impairment

When listening to a sound source in everyday-life situations, typical movement behavior can lead to a mismatch between the direction of the head and the direction of interest. This could reduce the performance of directional algorithms, as was shown in previous work for head movements of normal-hearing listeners. However, the movement behavior of hearing-impaired listeners and hearing aid users might be different, and if hearing aid users adapt their self-motion because of the directional algorithm, its performance might increase. In this work we therefore investigated the influence of hearing impairment on self-motion, and the interaction of hearing aids with self-motion. In order to do this, the self-motion of three hearing-impaired (HI) participant groups, aided with an adaptive differential microphone (ADM), aided without ADM, and unaided, was compared, also to previously measured self-motion data from younger and older normal-hearing (NH) participants. The self-motion was measured in virtual audiovisual environments (VEs) in the laboratory. Furthermore, the signal-to-noise ratios (SNRs) and SNR improvement of the ADM resulting from the head movements of the participants were estimated with acoustic simulations. A strong effect of hearing impairment on self-motion was found, which led to an overall increase in estimated SNR of 0.8 dB for the HI participants compared to the NH participants, and differences in estimated SNR improvement of the ADM. However, the self-motion of the HI participants aided with ADM and the other HI participants was very similar, indicating that they did not adapt their self-motion because of the ADM.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2021arXiv

The Concurrent OLSA test: A method for speech recognition in multi-talker situations at fixed SNR

A multi-talker paradigm is introduced that uses different attentional processes to adjust speech recognition scores with the goal to conduct measurements at high signal-to-noise ratios. The basic idea is to simulate a group conversation with three talkers and a participant. Talkers alternately speak sentences of the German matrix test OLSA. Each time a sentence begins with the name "Kerstin" (call sign), the participant is addressed and instructed to repeat the last words of all sentences from that talker, until another talker begins a sentence with "Kerstin". The alternation of the talkers is implemented with an adjustable overlap time that causes an overlap between the call sign "Kerstin" and the target words to be repeated. Thus, the two tasks of detecting "Kerstin" and repeating target words are to be processed at the same time as a dual task. The paradigm was tested with 22 young normal-hearing participants for three overlap times (0.6 s, 0.8 s, 1.0 s). Results for these overlap times show significant differences with median target word recognition scores of 88%, 82%, and 77%, respectively (including call sign and dual task effects). A comparison of the dual task with the corresponding single tasks suggests that the observed effects reflect an increased cognitive load.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2015arXiv

Evaluation of spatial audio reproduction schemes for application in hearing aid research

Loudspeaker-based spatial audio reproduction schemes are increasingly used for evaluating hearing aids in complex acoustic conditions. To further establish the feasibility of this approach, this study investigated the interaction between spatial resolution of different reproduction methods and technical and perceptual hearing aid performance measures using computer simulations. Three spatial audio reproduction methods -- discrete speakers, vector base amplitude panning and higher order ambisonics -- were compared in regular circular loudspeaker arrays with 4 to 72 channels. The influence of reproduction method and array size on performance measures of representative multi-microphone hearing aid algorithm classes with spatially distributed microphones and a representative single channel noise-reduction algorithm was analyzed. Algorithm classes differed in their way of analyzing and exploiting spatial properties of the sound field, requiring different accuracy of sound field reproduction. Performance measures included beam pattern analysis, signal-to-noise ratio analysis, perceptual localization prediction, and quality modeling. The results show performance differences and interaction effects between reproduction method and algorithm class that may be used for guidance when selecting the appropriate method and number of speakers for specific tasks in hearing aid research.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2015arXiv

Online Monaural Speech Enhancement Based on Periodicity Analysis and A Priori SNR Estimation

This paper describes an online algorithm for enhancing monaural noisy speech. Firstly, a novel phase-corrected low-delay gammatone filterbank is derived for signal subband decomposition and resynthesis; the subband signals are then analyzed frame by frame. Secondly, a novel feature named periodicity degree (PD) is proposed to be used for detecting and estimating the fundamental period (P0) in each frame and for estimating the signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) in each frame-subband signal unit. The PD is calculated in each unit as the multiplication of the normalized autocorrelation and the comb filter ratio, and shown to be robust in various low-SNR conditions. Thirdly, the noise energy level in each signal unit is estimated recursively based on the estimated SNR for units with high PD and based on the noisy signal energy level for units with low PD. Then the a priori SNR is estimated using a decision-directed approach with the estimated noise level. Finally, a revised Wiener gain is calculated, smoothed, and applied to each unit; the processed units are summed across subbands and frames to form the enhanced signal. The P0 detection accuracy of the algorithm was evaluated on two corpora and showed comparable performance on one corpus and better performance on the other corpus when compared to a recently published pitch detection algorithm. The speech enhancement effect of the algorithm was evaluated on one corpus with two objective criteria and showed better performance in one highly non-stationary noise and comparable performance in two other noises when compared to a state-of-the-art statistical-model based algorithm.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access