Researcher profile

Vladimir Groza

Vladimir Groza contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.

ResearcherAffiliation not importedOpen to collaborate

Trust snapshot

Quick read

Trust 13 - UnverifiedVerification L1Unclaimed author
2works
0followers
3topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Decide how to stay connected

Follow researcher0

Identity and collaboration

How to connect with this researcher

Claiming links this public author record to a researcher profile and unlocks direct collaboration workflows.

Log in to claim

Direct collaboration

Open a focused conversation when the fit is right

Claim this author entity first to unlock direct invitations.

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

2 published item(s)

preprint2022arXiv

3D-Morphomics, Morphological Features on CT scans for lung nodule malignancy diagnosis

Pathologies systematically induce morphological changes, thus providing a major but yet insufficiently quantified source of observables for diagnosis. The study develops a predictive model of the pathological states based on morphological features (3D-morphomics) on Computed Tomography (CT) volumes. A complete workflow for mesh extraction and simplification of an organ's surface is developed, and coupled with an automatic extraction of morphological features given by the distribution of mean curvature and mesh energy. An XGBoost supervised classifier is then trained and tested on the 3D-morphomics to predict the pathological states. This framework is applied to the prediction of the malignancy of lung's nodules. On a subset of NLST database with malignancy confirmed biopsy, using 3D-morphomics only, the classification model of lung nodules into malignant vs. benign achieves 0.964 of AUC. Three other sets of classical features are trained and tested, (1) clinical relevant features gives an AUC of 0.58, (2) 111 radiomics gives an AUC of 0.976, (3) radiologist ground truth (GT) containing the nodule size, attenuation and spiculation qualitative annotations gives an AUC of 0.979. We also test the Brock model and obtain an AUC of 0.826. Combining 3D-morphomics and radiomics features achieves state-of-the-art results with an AUC of 0.978 where the 3D-morphomics have some of the highest predictive powers. As a validation on a public independent cohort, models are applied to the LIDC dataset, the 3D-morphomics achieves an AUC of 0.906 and the 3D-morphomics+radiomics achieves an AUC of 0.958, which ranks second in the challenge among deep models. It establishes the curvature distributions as efficient features for predicting lung nodule malignancy and a new method that can be applied directly to arbitrary computer aided diagnosis task.

preprint2021arXiv

CHAOS Challenge -- Combined (CT-MR) Healthy Abdominal Organ Segmentation

Segmentation of abdominal organs has been a comprehensive, yet unresolved, research field for many years. In the last decade, intensive developments in deep learning (DL) have introduced new state-of-the-art segmentation systems. In order to expand the knowledge on these topics, the CHAOS - Combined (CT-MR) Healthy Abdominal Organ Segmentation challenge has been organized in conjunction with IEEE International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging (ISBI), 2019, in Venice, Italy. CHAOS provides both abdominal CT and MR data from healthy subjects for single and multiple abdominal organ segmentation. Five different but complementary tasks have been designed to analyze the capabilities of current approaches from multiple perspectives. The results are investigated thoroughly, compared with manual annotations and interactive methods. The analysis shows that the performance of DL models for single modality (CT / MR) can show reliable volumetric analysis performance (DICE: 0.98 $\pm$ 0.00 / 0.95 $\pm$ 0.01) but the best MSSD performance remain limited (21.89 $\pm$ 13.94 / 20.85 $\pm$ 10.63 mm). The performances of participating models decrease significantly for cross-modality tasks for the liver (DICE: 0.88 $\pm$ 0.15 MSSD: 36.33 $\pm$ 21.97 mm) and all organs (DICE: 0.85 $\pm$ 0.21 MSSD: 33.17 $\pm$ 38.93 mm). Despite contrary examples on different applications, multi-tasking DL models designed to segment all organs seem to perform worse compared to organ-specific ones (performance drop around 5\%). Besides, such directions of further research for cross-modality segmentation would significantly support real-world clinical applications. Moreover, having more than 1500 participants, another important contribution of the paper is the analysis on shortcomings of challenge organizations such as the effects of multiple submissions and peeking phenomena.