BZPEERReading, trust and collaboration for research
Menu

Discover

GraphFollow connections around a paper, topic or saved view.

Workspaces

HomePick up where your research flow left off.InboxHandle requests, replies and notifications from one place.CollectionsCurate reading lists, evidence sets and shareable dossiers.ResearchSee your private provenance graph, trail and imports.CollaborationMove from discovery into focused discussion rooms.PublishDraft, preview and publish full-text research articles.

Network

ExpertsFind specialists worth following or asking for help.CommunitiesJoin research circles organized around shared work.PartnersSee external organizations active around the same topics.

Opportunities

ListingsBrowse roles, calls and collaborations with clearer fit signals.

Account

Log inReturn to your reading and collaboration workspace.Create accountStart saving work, following people and joining teams.
Log inCreate account

Researcher profile

Viktor Zamaraev

Viktor Zamaraev contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.

ResearcherAffiliation not importedOpen to collaborate
Data Structures and AlgorithmsComputational ComplexityDiscrete Mathematicsmath.COmath.OC

Trust snapshot

Quick read

Trust 19 - UnverifiedVerification L1Unclaimed author
5works
0followers
5topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Decide how to stay connected

Follow researcher0

Identity and collaboration

How to connect with this researcher

Claiming links this public author record to a researcher profile and unlocks direct collaboration workflows.

Log in to claim

Direct collaboration

Open a focused conversation when the fit is right

Claim this author entity first to unlock direct invitations.

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

5 published item(s)

preprint2022arXiv

Letter graphs and geometric grid classes of permutations

We uncover a connection between two seemingly unrelated notions: lettericity, from structural graph theory, and geometric griddability, from the world of permutation patterns. Both of these notions capture important structural properties of their respective classes of objects. We prove that these notions are equivalent in the sense that a permutation class is geometrically griddable if and only if the corresponding class of inversion graphs has bounded lettericity.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2022arXiv

Linear Programming Complementation

In this paper we introduce a new operation for Linear Programming (LP), called LP complementation, which resembles many properties of LP duality. Given a maximisation (resp.~minimisation) LP $P$, we define its complement $Q$ as a specific minimisation (resp.~maximisation) LP with the same objective function as $P$. Our central result is the LP complementation theorem, that establishes the following relationship between the optimal value $\text{Opt}(P)$ of $P$ and the optimal value $\text{Opt}(Q)$ of its complement: $\frac{1}{\text{Opt}(P)}+\frac{1}{\text{Opt}(Q)}=1$. The LP complementation operation can be applied if and only if $\text{Opt}(P) > 1$. We then apply LP complementation to hypergraphs. For every hypergraph $H=(V,E)$, its dual is $H^*$ and we call $\overline{H}=(V,\{V\setminus e : e\in E\})$ the complement of $H$. For the covering LP $K(H)$ we obtain $\frac{1}{ \text{Opt}( K(H^*) ) }+\frac{1}{\text{Opt}( K(\overline{H}) ) } = 1$ (and similarly for packing, matching and transversal LPs). We then consider \emph{fractional graph theory}. We prove that the LP for the \Define{fractional in-dominating number} of a digraph $D$ is the complement of the LP for the \Define{fractional total out-dominating number} of the digraph complement of $D$. We also establish that the fractional matching number of a matroid coincides with its edge toughness. Finally, we introduce the problem \text{Vertex Cover with Budget (VCB)}: for a graph $G$ and a positive integer $b$, what is the maximum number $t_b$ of vertex covers $S_1, \dots, S_{t_b}$ of $G$, such that every vertex appears in at most $b$ vertex covers? We relate \text{VCB} with the LP $Q_G$ for the fractional chromatic number of $G$: as $b \to \infty$, $t_b \sim t_f \cdot b$, where $t_f$ is the optimal value of the complement LP of $Q_G$.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2021arXiv

Deleting edges to restrict the size of an epidemic in temporal networks

Spreading processes on graphs are a natural model for a wide variety of real-world phenomena, including information spread over social networks and biological diseases spreading over contact networks. Often, the networks over which these processes spread are dynamic in nature, and can be modeled with temporal graphs. Here, we study the problem of deleting edges from a given temporal graph in order to reduce the number of vertices (temporally) reachable from a given starting point. This could be used to control the spread of a disease, rumour, etc. in a temporal graph. In particular, our aim is to find a temporal subgraph in which a process starting at any single vertex can be transferred to only a limited number of other vertices using a temporally-feasible path. We introduce a natural edge-deletion problem for temporal graphs and provide positive and negative results on its computational complexity and approximability.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2020arXiv

Exact and Approximate Algorithms for Computing a Second Hamiltonian Cycle

In this paper we consider the following total functional problem: Given a cubic Hamiltonian graph $G$ and a Hamiltonian cycle $C_0$ of $G$, how can we compute a second Hamiltonian cycle $C_1 \neq C_0$ of $G$? Cedric Smith proved in 1946, using a non-constructive parity argument, that such a second Hamiltonian cycle always exists. Our main result is an algorithm which computes the second Hamiltonian cycle in time $O(n \cdot 2^{(0.3-\varepsilon)n})$ time, for some positive constant $\varepsilon>0$, and in polynomial space, thus improving the state of the art running time for solving this problem. Our algorithm is based on a fundamental structural property of Thomason's lollipop algorithm, which we prove here for the first time. In the direction of approximating the length of a second cycle in a Hamiltonian graph $G$ with a given Hamiltonian cycle $C_0$ (where we may not have guarantees on the existence of a second Hamiltonian cycle), we provide a linear-time algorithm computing a second cycle with length at least $n - 4α(\sqrt{n}+2α)+8$, where $α= \frac{Δ-2}{δ-2}$ and $δ,Δ$ are the minimum and the maximum degree of the graph, respectively. This approximation result also improves the state of the art.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2020arXiv

Matching in Stochastically Evolving Graphs

This paper studies the maximum cardinality matching problem in stochastically evolving graphs. We formally define the arrival-departure model with stochastic departures. There, a graph is sampled from a specific probability distribution and it is revealed as a series of snapshots. Our goal is to study algorithms that create a large matching in the sampled graphs. We define the price of stochasticity for this problem which intuitively captures the loss of any algorithm in the worst case in the size of the matching due to the uncertainty of the model. Furthermore, we prove the existence of a deterministic optimal algorithm for the problem. In our second set of results we show that we can efficiently approximate the expected size of a maximum cardinality matching by deriving a fully randomized approximation scheme (FPRAS) for it. The FPRAS is the backbone of a probabilistic algorithm that is optimal when the model is defined over two timesteps. Our last result is an upper bound of $\frac{2}{3}$ on the price of stochasticity. This means that there is no algorithm that can match more than $\frac{2}{3}$ of the edges of an optimal matching in hindsight.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access