Source author record

Viktor Vafeiadis

Viktor Vafeiadis appears in the imported research catalog. Authorship, coauthor and topic links are available while profile ownership is still unclaimed.

ResearcherUnclaimed source record

Logic in Computer Science Programming Languages

Catalog footprint

What is connected

3works

2topics

4close collaborators

Actions

Connect this record

Open graph Browse works

Inspect adjacent papers, topics, institutions and collaborators without losing the researcher page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

preprint2021arXiv

VSync: Push-Button Verification and Optimization for Synchronization Primitives on Weak Memory Models (Technical Report)

This technical report contains material accompanying our work with same title published at ASPLOS'21. We start in Sec. 1 with a detailed presentation of the core innovation of this work, Await Model Checking (AMC). The correctness proofs of AMC can be found in Sec. 2. Next, we discuss three study cases in Sec. 3, presenting bugs found and challenges encountered when applying VSync to existing code bases. Finally, in Sec. 4 we describe the setup details of our evaluation and report further experimental results.

preprint2020arXiv

Reconciling Event Structures with Modern Multiprocessors

Weakestmo is a recently proposed memory consistency model that uses event structures to resolve the infamous "out-of-thin-air" problem. Although it has been shown to have important benefits over other memory models, its established compilation schemes are suboptimal in that they add more fences than necessary. In this paper, we prove the correctness in Coq of the intended compilation schemes for Weakestmo to a range of hardware memory models (x86, POWER, ARMv7, ARMv8, RISC-V). Our proof is the first that establishes correctness of compilation of an event-structure-based model that forbids "thin-air" behaviors, as well as the first mechanized compilation proof of a weak memory model supporting sequentially consistent accesses to such a range of hardware platforms. Our compilation proof goes via the recent Intermediate Memory Model (IMM), which we suitably extend with sequentially consistent accesses.

preprint2015arXiv

Aspect-oriented linearizability proofs

Linearizability of concurrent data structures is usually proved by monolithic simulation arguments relying on the identification of the so-called linearization points. Regrettably, such proofs, whether manual or automatic, are often complicated and scale poorly to advanced non-blocking concurrency patterns, such as helping and optimistic updates. In response, we propose a more modular way of checking linearizability of concurrent queue algorithms that does not involve identifying linearization points. We reduce the task of proving linearizability with respect to the queue specification to establishing four basic properties, each of which can be proved independently by simpler arguments. As a demonstration of our approach, we verify the Herlihy and Wing queue, an algorithm that is challenging to verify by a simulation proof.