Source author record

Vikram Sharma

Vikram Sharma appears in the imported research catalog. Authorship, coauthor and topic links are available while profile ownership is still unclaimed.

ResearcherUnclaimed source record

Catalog footprint

What is connected

4works
4topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Connect this record

Log in to claim

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent papers, topics, institutions and collaborators without losing the researcher page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

4 published item(s)

preprint2020arXiv

Generalizing The Davenport-Mahler-Mignotte Bound -- The Weighted Case

Root separation bounds play an important role as a complexity measure in understanding the behaviour of various algorithms in computational algebra, e.g., root isolation algorithms. A classic result in the univariate setting is the Davenport-Mahler-Mignotte (DMM) bound. One way to state the bound is to consider a directed acyclic graph $(V,E)$ on a subset of roots of a degree $d$ polynomial $f(z) \in \mathbb{C}[z]$, where the edges point from a root of smaller absolute value to one of larger absolute, and the in-degrees of all vertices is at most one. Then the DMM bound is an amortized lower bound on the following product: $\prod_{(α,β) \in E}|α-β|$. However, the lower bound involves the discriminant of the polynomial $f$, and becomes trivial if the polynomial is not square-free. This was resolved by Eigenwillig, (2008), by using a suitable subdiscriminant instead of the discriminant. Escorcielo-Perrucci, 2016, further dropped the in-degree constraint on the graph by using the theory of finite differences. Emiris et al., 2019, have generalized their result to handle the case where the exponent of the term $|α-β|$ in the product is at most the multiplicity of either of the roots. In this paper, we generalize these results by allowing arbitrary positive integer weights on the edges of the graph, i.e., for a weight function $w: E \rightarrow \mathbb{Z}_{>0}$, we derive an amortized lower bound on $\prod_{(α,β) \in E}|α-β|^{w(α,β)}$. Such a product occurs in the complexity estimates of some recent algorithms for root clustering (e.g., Becker et al., 2016), where the weights are usually some function of the multiplicity of the roots. Because of its amortized nature, our bound is arguably better than the bounds obtained by manipulating existing results to accommodate the weights.

preprint2020arXiv

Isotopic Arrangement of Simple Curves: an Exact Numerical Approach based on Subdivision

This paper presents the first purely numerical (i.e., non-algebraic) subdivision algorithm for the isotopic approximation of a simple arrangement of curves. The arrangement is "simple" in the sense that any three curves have no common intersection, any two curves intersect transversally, and each curve is non-singular. A curve is given as the zero set of an analytic function $f:\mathbb{R}^2\rightarrow \mathbb{R}^2$, and effective interval forms of $f, \frac{\partial{f}}{\partial{x}}, \frac{\partial{f}}{\partial{y}}$ are available. Our solution generalizes the isotopic curve approximation algorithms of Plantinga-Vegter (2004) and Lin-Yap (2009). We use certified numerical primitives based on interval methods. Such algorithms have many favorable properties: they are practical, easy to implement, suffer no implementation gaps, integrate topological with geometric computation, and have adaptive as well as local complexity. A version of this paper without the appendices appeared in Lien et al. (2014).

preprint2016arXiv

A Near-Optimal Subdivision Algorithm for Complex Root Isolation based on the Pellet Test and Newton Iteration

We describe a subdivision algorithm for isolating the complex roots of a polynomial $F\in\mathbb{C}[x]$. Given an oracle that provides approximations of each of the coefficients of $F$ to any absolute error bound and given an arbitrary square $\mathcal{B}$ in the complex plane containing only simple roots of $F$, our algorithm returns disjoint isolating disks for the roots of $F$ in $\mathcal{B}$. Our complexity analysis bounds the absolute error to which the coefficients of $F$ have to be provided, the total number of iterations, and the overall bit complexity. It further shows that the complexity of our algorithm is controlled by the geometry of the roots in a near neighborhood of the input square $\mathcal{B}$, namely, the number of roots, their absolute values and pairwise distances. The number of subdivision steps is near-optimal. For the \emph{benchmark problem}, namely, to isolate all the roots of a polynomial of degree $n$ with integer coefficients of bit size less than $τ$, our algorithm needs $\tilde O(n^3+n^2τ)$ bit operations, which is comparable to the record bound of Pan (2002). It is the first time that such a bound has been achieved using subdivision methods, and independent of divide-and-conquer techniques such as Schönhage's splitting circle technique. Our algorithm uses the quadtree construction of Weyl (1924) with two key ingredients: using Pellet's Theorem (1881) combined with Graeffe iteration, we derive a "soft-test" to count the number of roots in a disk. Using Schröder's modified Newton operator combined with bisection, in a form inspired by the quadratic interval method from Abbot (2006), we achieve quadratic convergence towards root clusters. Relative to the divide-conquer algorithms, our algorithm is quite simple with the potential of being practical. This paper is self-contained: we provide pseudo-code for all subroutines used by our algorithm.

preprint2015arXiv

Near Optimal Subdivision Algorithms for Real Root Isolation

We describe a subroutine that improves the running time of any subdivision algorithm for real root isolation. The subroutine first detects clusters of roots using a result of Ostrowski, and then uses Newton iteration to converge to them. Near a cluster, we switch to subdivision, and proceed recursively. The subroutine has the advantage that it is independent of the predicates used to terminate the subdivision. This gives us an alternative and simpler approach to recent developments of Sagraloff (2012) and Sagraloff-Mehlhorn (2013), assuming exact arithmetic. The subdivision tree size of our algorithm using predicates based on Descartes's rule of signs is bounded by $O(n\log n)$, which is better by $O(n\log L)$ compared to known results. Our analysis differs in two key aspects. First, we use the general technique of continuous amortization from Burr-Krahmer-Yap (2009), and second, we use the geometry of clusters of roots instead of the Davenport-Mahler bound. The analysis naturally extends to other predicates.