Researcher profile

Vidya Sagar Sharma

Vidya Sagar Sharma contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.

ResearcherAffiliation not importedOpen to collaborate

Trust snapshot

Quick read

Trust 13 - UnverifiedVerification L1Unclaimed author
2works
0followers
4topics
1close collaborators

Actions

Decide how to stay connected

Follow researcher0

Identity and collaboration

How to connect with this researcher

Claiming links this public author record to a researcher profile and unlocks direct collaboration workflows.

Log in to claim

Direct collaboration

Open a focused conversation when the fit is right

Claim this author entity first to unlock direct invitations.

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

2 published item(s)

preprint2023arXiv

Faster Fixed Parameter Tractable Algorithms for Counting Markov Equivalence Classes with Special Skeletons

The structure of Markov equivalence classes (MECs) of causal DAGs has been studied extensively. A natural question in this regard is to algorithmically find the number of MECs with a given skeleton. Until recently, the known results for this problem were in the setting of very special graphs (such as paths, cycles, and star graphs). More recently, a fixed-parameter tractable (FPT) algorithm was given for this problem which, given an input graph $G$, counts the number of MECs with the skeleton $G$ in $O(n(2^{O(d^4k^4)} + n^2))$ time, where $n$, $d$, and $k$, respectively, are the numbers of nodes, the degree, and the treewidth of $G$. We give a faster FPT algorithm that solves the problem in $O(n(2^{O(d^2k^2)} + n^2))$ time when the input graph is chordal. Additionally, we show that the runtime can be further improved to polynomial time when the input graph $G$ is a tree.

preprint2020arXiv

The PSPACE-hardness of understanding neural circuits

In neuroscience, an important aspect of understanding the function of a neural circuit is to determine which, if any, of the neurons in the circuit are vital for the biological behavior governed by the neural circuit. A similar problem is to determine whether a given small set of neurons may be enough for the behavior to be displayed, even if all other neurons in the circuit are deactivated. Such a subset of neurons forms what is called a degenerate circuit for the behavior being studied. Recent advances in experimental techniques have provided researchers with tools to activate and deactivate subsets of neurons with a very high resolution, even in living animals. The data collected from such experiments may be of the following form: when a given subset of neurons is deactivated, is the behavior under study observed? This setting leads to the algorithmic question of determining the minimal vital or degenerate sets of neurons when one is given as input a description of the neural circuit. The algorithmic problem entails both figuring out which subsets of neurons should be perturbed (activated/deactivated), and then using the data from those perturbations to determine the minimal vital or degenerate sets. Given the large number of possible perturbations, and the recurrent nature of neural circuits, the possibility of a combinatorial explosion in such an approach has been recognized in the biology and the neuroscience literature. In this paper, we prove that the problems of finding minimal or minimum-size degenerate sets, and of finding the set of vital neurons, of a neural circuit given as input, are in fact PSPACE-hard. More importantly, we prove our hardness results by showing that a simpler problem, that of simulating such neural circuits, is itself PSPACE-hard.