Source author record

Venera Tomaselli

Venera Tomaselli appears in the imported research catalog. Authorship, coauthor and topic links are available while profile ownership is still unclaimed.

ResearcherUnclaimed source record

Catalog footprint

What is connected

2works
3topics
3close collaborators

Actions

Connect this record

Log in to claim

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent papers, topics, institutions and collaborators without losing the researcher page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

2 published item(s)

preprint2022arXiv

Hybrid Probabilistic-Snowball Sampling

Snowball sampling is the common name for sampling designs on human populations where respondents are requested to share the questionnaire among their social ties. With some exceptions, estimates from snowball samplings are considered biased. However, the magnitude of the bias is influenced by a combination of elements of the sampling design and features of the target population. Hybrid Probabilistic-Snowball Sampling Designs (HPSSD) aims to reduce the main source of bias in the snowball sample through randomly oversampling the first stage 0 of the snowball. To check the behaviour of HPSSD for applications, we developed an algorithm that, by grafting the edges of a stochastic blockmodel into a graph of cliques, simulates an assortative network of tobacco smokers. Different outcomes of the HPSSD operations are simulated, too. Inference on 8,000 runs of the simulation leads to think that HPSSD does not improve reliability of samples that are already representative. But if homophily in the population is sufficiently low, even the unadjusted sample mean of HPSSD has a slightly better performance than a random, but undersized, sampling. De-biasing the estimates of HPSSD shows improvement in the performance, so an adjusted HPSSD estimator is a desirable development.

preprint2015arXiv

Ecological fallacy and covariates: new insights based on multilevel modelling of individual data

This paper deals with the issue of ecological bias in ecological inference. We provide an explicit formulation of the conditions required for the ordinary ecological regression to produce unbiased estimates and argue that, when these conditions are violated, any method of ecological inference is going to produce biased estimates. These findings are clarified and supported by empirical evidence provided by comparing the results of three main ecological inference methods with those of multilevel logistic regression applied to a unique set of individual data on voting behaviour. The main findings of our study have two important implications that apply to all situations where the conditions for no ecological bias are violated: (i) only ecological inference methods that allow to model the effect of covariates have a chance to produce unbiased estimates; (ii) the set of covariates to be included in the model to remove bias is limited to the marginal proportions. Finally, our results suggest that, when the association between two ecological variables is very weak, it is not possible to obtain unbiased estimates even by an appropriate model that accounts for the effect of relevant covariates.