Researcher profile

Vašek Chvátal

Vašek Chvátal contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.

ResearcherAffiliation not importedOpen to collaborate

Trust snapshot

Quick read

Trust 15 - UnverifiedVerification L1Unclaimed author
3works
0followers
2topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Decide how to stay connected

Follow researcher0

Identity and collaboration

How to connect with this researcher

Claiming links this public author record to a researcher profile and unlocks direct collaboration workflows.

Log in to claim

Direct collaboration

Open a focused conversation when the fit is right

Claim this author entity first to unlock direct invitations.

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

3 published item(s)

preprint2022arXiv

Metric hypergraphs and metric-line equivalences

In a metric space $M=(X,d)$, we say that $v$ is between $u$ and $w$ if $d(u,w)=d(u,v)+d(v,w)$. Taking all triples $\{u,v,w\}$ such that $v$ is between $u$ and $w$, one can associate a 3-uniform hypergraph with each finite metric space $M$. An effort to solve some basic open questions regarding finite metric spaces has motivated an endeavor to better understand these associated hypergraphs. In answer to a question posed in arXiv:1112.0376, we present an infinite family of hypergraphs that are non-metric, i.e., they don't arise from any metric space. Another basic structure associated with a metric space is a binary equivalence on the vertex set, where two pairs are in the same class if they induce the same line. An equivalence that comes from some metric space is a metric-line equivalence. We present an infinite family of so called obstacles, that is, binary equivalences that prevent an equivalence from being a metric-line equivalence.

preprint2011arXiv

Finite Sholander Trees, Trees, and their Betweenness

We provide a proof of Sholander's claim (Trees, lattices, order, and betweenness, Proc. Amer. Math. Soc. 3, 369-381 (1952)) concerning the representability of collections of so-called segments by trees, which yields a characterization of the interval function of a tree. Furthermore, we streamline Burigana's characterization (Tree representations of betweenness relations defined by intersection and inclusion, Mathematics and Social Sciences 185, 5-36 (2009)) of tree betweenness and provide a relatively short proof.