Researcher profile

V. Sidoravicius

V. Sidoravicius contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.

ResearcherAffiliation not importedOpen to collaborate

Trust snapshot

Quick read

Trust 17 - UnverifiedVerification L1Unclaimed author
4works
0followers
4topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Decide how to stay connected

Follow researcher0

Identity and collaboration

How to connect with this researcher

Claiming links this public author record to a researcher profile and unlocks direct collaboration workflows.

Log in to claim

Direct collaboration

Open a focused conversation when the fit is right

Claim this author entity first to unlock direct invitations.

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

4 published item(s)

preprint2016arXiv

Critical fragmentation properties of random drilling: How many random holes need to be drilled to collapse a wooden cube?

A solid wooden cube fragments into pieces as we sequentially drill holes through it randomly. This seemingly straightforward observation encompasses deep and nontrivial geometrical and probabilistic behavior that is discussed here. Combining numerical simulations and rigorous results, we find off-critical scale-free behavior and a continuous transition at a critical density of holes that significantly differs from classical percolation.

preprint2015arXiv

Coarsening with a frozen vertex

In the standard nearest-neighbor coarsening model with state space $\{-1,+1\}^{\mathbb{Z}^2}$ and initial state chosen from symmetric product measure, it is known (see~\cite{NNS}) that almost surely, every vertex flips infinitely often. In this paper, we study the modified model in which a single vertex is frozen to $+1$ for all time, and show that every other site still flips infinitely often. The proof combines stochastic domination (attractivity) and influence propagation arguments.