BZPEERReading, trust and collaboration for research
Menu

Discover

GraphFollow connections around a paper, topic or saved view.

Workspaces

HomePick up where your research flow left off.InboxHandle requests, replies and notifications from one place.CollectionsCurate reading lists, evidence sets and shareable dossiers.ResearchSee your private provenance graph, trail and imports.CollaborationMove from discovery into focused discussion rooms.PublishDraft, preview and publish full-text research articles.

Network

ExpertsFind specialists worth following or asking for help.CommunitiesJoin research circles organized around shared work.PartnersSee external organizations active around the same topics.

Opportunities

ListingsBrowse roles, calls and collaborations with clearer fit signals.

Account

Log inReturn to your reading and collaboration workspace.Create accountStart saving work, following people and joining teams.
Log inCreate account

Researcher profile

V. C. Busti

V. C. Busti contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.

ResearcherAffiliation not importedOpen to collaborate
astro-ph.COgr-qc

Trust snapshot

Quick read

Trust 21 - Emerging
7works
0followers
2topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Decide how to stay connected

Follow researcher0

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

7 published item(s)

preprint2014arXiv

Robustness of $H_0$ determination at intermediate redshifts

The most recent Hubble constant ($H_0)$ estimates from local methods (z << 1), $H_0=73.8\pm 2.4$ km s$^{-1}$ Mpc$^{-1}$, and the one from high redshifts $H_0=67.3\pm 1.2$ km s$^{-1}$ Mpc$^{-1}$, are discrepant at $2.4 σ$ confidence level. Within this context, Lima & Cunha (LC) derived a new determination of $H_0$ using four cosmic probes at intermediate redshifts ($0.1<z<1.8$) based on the so-called flat $Λ$CDM model. They obtained $H_0=74.1\pm 2.2$ km s$^{-1}$ Mpc$^{-1}$, in full agreement with local measurements. In this Letter, we explore the robustness of the LC result searching for systematic errors and its dependence from the cosmological model used. We find that the $H_0$ value from this joint analysis is very weakly dependent on the underlying cosmological model, but the morphology adopted to infer the distance to galaxy clusters changes the result sizeably, being the main source of systematic errors. Therefore, a better understanding of the cluster morphology is paramount to transform this method into a powerful cross-check for $H_0$.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2014arXiv

Studying light propagation in a locally homogeneous universe through an extended Dyer-Roeder approach

Light is affected by local inhomogeneities in its propagation, which may alter distances and so cosmological parameter estimation. In the era of precision cosmology, the presence of inhomogeneities may induce systematic errors if not properly accounted. In this vein, a new interpretation of the conventional Dyer-Roeder (DR) approach by allowing light received from distant sources to travel in regions denser than average is proposed. It is argued that the existence of a distribution of small and moderate cosmic voids (or &#34;black regions&#34;) implies that its matter content was redistributed to the homogeneous and clustered matter components with the former becoming denser than the cosmic average in the absence of voids. Phenomenologically, this means that the DR smoothness parameter (denoted here by $α_E$) can be greater than unity, and, therefore, all previous analyses constraining it should be rediscussed with a free upper limit. Accordingly, by performing a statistical analysis involving 557 type Ia supernovae (SNe Ia) from Union2 compilation data in a flat $Λ$CDM model we obtain for the extended parameter, $α_E=1.26^{+0.68}_{-0.54}$ ($1σ$). The effects of $α_E$ are also analyzed for generic $Λ$CDM models and flat XCDM cosmologies. For both models, we find that a value of $α_E$ greater than unity is able to harmonize SNe Ia and cosmic microwave background observations thereby alleviating the well-known tension between low and high redshift data. Finally, a simple toy model based on the existence of cosmic voids is proposed in order to justify why $α_E$ can be greater than unity as required by supernovae data.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2013arXiv

Supernovae as probes of cosmic parameters: estimating the bias from under-dense lines of sight

Correctly interpreting observations of sources such as type Ia supernovae (SNe Ia) require knowledge of the power spectrum of matter on AU scales - which is very hard to model accurately. Because under-dense regions account for much of the volume of the universe, light from a typical source probes a mean density significantly below the cosmic mean. The relative sparsity of sources implies that there could be a significant bias when inferring distances of SNe Ia, and consequently a bias in cosmological parameter estimation. While the weak lensing approximation should in principle give the correct prediction for this, linear perturbation theory predicts an effectively infinite variance in the convergence for ultra-narrow beams. We attempt to quantify the effect typically under-dense lines of sight might have in parameter estimation by considering three alternative methods for estimating distances, in addition to the usual weak lensing approximation. We find in each case this not only increases the errors in the inferred density parameters, but also introduces a bias in the posterior value.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2012arXiv

Constraining H0 from Lyman-alpha Forest and Baryon Acoustic Oscillations

A new method is proposed to measure the Hubble constant H0 through the mean transmitted flux observed from high redshift quasars. A semi-analytical model for the cosmological-independent volume density distribution function is adopted which allows one to obtain constraints over the cosmological parameters once a moderate knowlegde of the InterGalactic Medium (IGM) parameters is assumed. By assuming a flat LCDM cosmology, we show that such method alone cannot provide good constraints on the pair of free parameters (h, Omega_m). However, it is possible possible to break the degeneracy on the mass density parameter by applying a joint analysis involving the baryon acoustic oscillations (BAOs). Our analysis based on two different samples of Lyman-alpha forest restricts the parameters on the intervals 0.58 < h < 0.91 and 0.215 < Omega_m < 0.245 (1 sigma). Although the constraints are weaker comparatively to other estimates, we point out that with a bigger sample and a better knowledge of the IGM this method may present competitive results to measure the Hubble constant independently of the cosmic distance ladder.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2012arXiv

Constraining the dark energy and smoothness parameter with type Ia Supernovae and Gamma-Ray Bursts

The existence of inhomogeneities in the observed Universe modifies the distance-redshift relations thereby affecting the results of cosmological tests in comparison to the ones derived assuming spatially uniform models. By modeling the inhomogeneities through a Zeldovich-Kantowski-Dyer-Roeder (ZKDR) approach which is phenomenologically characterized by a smoothness parameter $α$, we rediscuss the constraints on the cosmic parameters based on Supernovae type Ia and Gamma-Ray Bursts (GRBs) data. The present analysis is restricted to a flat $Λ$CDM model with the reasonable assumption that $Λ$ does not clump. A $χ^{2}$-analysis using 557 SNe Ia data from the Union2 Compilation Data (Amanullah {\it et al.} 2010) constrains the pair of parameters ($Ω_m, α$) to $Ω_m=0.27_{-0.03}^{+0.08}$($2σ$) and $α\geq 0.25$. A similar analysis based only on 59 Hymnium GRBs (Wei 2010) constrains the matter density parameter to be $Ω_m= 0.35^{+0.62}_{-0.24}$ ($2σ$) while all values for the smoothness parameter are allowed. By performing a joint analysis, it is found that $Ω_m = 0.27^{+0.06}_{-0.03}$ and $α\geq 0.52$. As a general result, although considering that current GRB data alone cannot constrain the smoothness $α$ parameter our analysis provides an interesting cosmological probe for dark energy even in the presence of inhomogeneities.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2012arXiv

Influence of Small-Scale Inhomogeneities on the Cosmological Consistency Tests

The current cosmological dark sector (dark matter plus dark energy) is challenging our comprehension about the physical processes taking place in the Universe. Recently, some authors tried to falsify the basic underlying assumptions of such dark matter-dark energy paradigm. In this Letter, we show that oversimplifications of the measurement process may produce false positives to any consistency test based on the globally homogeneous and isotropic LCDM model and its expansion history based on distance measurements. In particular, when local inhomogeneity effects due to clumped matter or voids are taken into account, an apparent violation of the basic assumptions (&#34;Copernican Principle&#34;) seems to be present. Conversely, the amplitude of the deviations also probes the degree of reliability underlying the phenomenological Dyer-Roeder procedure by confronting its predictions with the accuracy of the weak lensing approach. Finally, a new method is devised to reconstruct the effects of the inhomogeneities in a LCDM model, and some suggestions of how to distinguish between clumpiness (or void) effects from different cosmologies are discussed.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2011arXiv

Comment on &#34;Constraining the smoothness parameter and dark energy using observational H(z) data&#34;

In this Comment we discuss a recent analysis by Yu et al. [RAA 11, 125 (2011)] about constraints on the smoothness $α$ parameter and dark energy models using observational $H(z)$ data. It is argued here that their procedure is conceptually inconsistent with the basic assumptions underlying the adopted Dyer-Roeder approach. In order to properly quantify the influence of the $H(z)$ data on the smoothness $α$ parameter, a $χ^2$-test involving a sample of SNe Ia and $H(z)$ data in the context of a flat $Λ$CDM model is reanalyzed. This result is confronted with an earlier approach discussed by Santos et al. (2008) without $H(z)$ data. In the ($Ω_m, α$) plane, it is found that such parameters are now restricted on the intervals $0.66 \leq α\leq 1.0$ and $0.27 \leq Ω_m \leq 0.37$ within 95.4% confidence level (2$σ$), and, therefore, fully compatible with the homogeneous case. The basic conclusion is that a joint analysis involving $H(z)$ data can indirectly improve our knowledge about the influence of the inhomogeneities. However, this happens only because the $H(z)$ data provide tighter constraints on the matter density parameter $Ω_m$.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access