BZPEERReading, trust and collaboration for research
Menu

Discover

GraphFollow connections around a paper, topic or saved view.

Workspaces

HomePick up where your research flow left off.InboxHandle requests, replies and notifications from one place.CollectionsCurate reading lists, evidence sets and shareable dossiers.ResearchSee your private provenance graph, trail and imports.CollaborationMove from discovery into focused discussion rooms.PublishDraft, preview and publish full-text research articles.

Network

ExpertsFind specialists worth following or asking for help.CommunitiesJoin research circles organized around shared work.PartnersSee external organizations active around the same topics.

Opportunities

ListingsBrowse roles, calls and collaborations with clearer fit signals.

Account

Log inReturn to your reading and collaboration workspace.Create accountStart saving work, following people and joining teams.
Log inCreate account

Researcher profile

Uwe Wolter

Uwe Wolter contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.

ResearcherAffiliation not importedOpen to collaborate
Software EngineeringLogic in Computer Science

Trust snapshot

Quick read

Trust 13 - UnverifiedVerification L1Unclaimed author
2works
0followers
2topics
2close collaborators

Actions

Decide how to stay connected

Follow researcher0

Identity and collaboration

How to connect with this researcher

Claiming links this public author record to a researcher profile and unlocks direct collaboration workflows.

Log in to claim

Direct collaboration

Open a focused conversation when the fit is right

Claim this author entity first to unlock direct invitations.

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

2 published item(s)

preprint2021arXiv

Logics of First-Order Constraints -- A Category Independent Approach

Reflecting our experiences in areas, like Algebraic Specifications, Abstract Model Theory, Graph Transformations, and Model Driven Software Engineering (MDSE), we present a general, category independent approach to Logics of First-Order Constraints (LFOC). Traditional First-Order Logic, Description Logic and the sketch framework are discussed as examples. We use the concept of institution [Diaconescu08,GoguenBurstall92] as a guideline to describe LFOC's. The main result states that any choice of the six parameters, we are going to describe, gives us a corresponding "institution of constraints" at hand. The "presentations" for an institution of constraints can be characterized as "first-order sketches". As a corresponding variant of the "sketch-entailments" in [Makkai97], we finally introduce "sketch rules" to equip LFOC's with the necessary expressive power.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2020arXiv

Multilevel Typed Graph Transformations

Multilevel modeling extends traditional modeling techniques with a potentially unlimited number of abstraction levels. Multilevel models can be formally represented by multilevel typed graphs whose manipulation and transformation are carried out by multilevel typed graph transformation rules. These rules are cospans of three graphs and two inclusion graph homomorphisms where the three graphs are multilevel typed over a common typing chain. In this paper, we show that typed graph transformations can be appropriately generalized to multilevel typed graph transformations improving preciseness, flexibility and reusability of transformation rules. We identify type compatibility conditions, for rules and their matches, formulated as equations and inequations, respectively, between composed partial typing morphisms. These conditions are crucial presuppositions for the application of a rule for a match---based on a pushout and a final pullback complement construction for the underlying graphs in the category Graph---to always provide a well-defined canonical result in the multilevel typed setting. Moreover, to formalize and analyze multilevel typing as well as to prove the necessary results, in a systematic way, we introduce the category Chain of typing chains and typing chain morphisms.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access