BZPEERPapers, people, evidence and research paths
Menu

Discover

SearchFind papers, people, topics, institutions and opportunities from one place.GraphSee how papers, authors, topics and evidence connect.

Research tools

HomeContinue from the papers, people and topics that matter now.CollectionsTurn saved papers into reading lists, evidence maps and shareable context.ResearchReconstruct the path that led you from search to paper to question.CollaborationMove from a paper, topic or expert request into a focused thread.PublishCreate full-text research articles with metadata, formulas and versions.

Network

ExpertsFind specialists whose work and reviews explain why they can help.CommunitiesJoin research groups organized around papers, topics and shared evidence.

Opportunities

ListingsBrowse roles, calls and collaborations connected to real research context.

Account

Log inReturn to your saved papers, graph views and active threads.Create accountStart saving papers, building a research trail and joining teams.
Log inCreate account

Source author record

Łukasz Jeż

Łukasz Jeż appears in the imported research catalog. Authorship, coauthor and topic links are available while profile ownership is still unclaimed.

ResearcherUnclaimed source record
Data Structures and AlgorithmsComputer Science and Game TheoryDiscrete Mathematicsmath.COmath.OC

Catalog footprint

What is connected

10works
5topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Connect this record

Log in to claim
Open graphBrowse works

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent papers, topics, institutions and collaborators without losing the researcher page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

10 published item(s)

preprint2022arXiv

Lower bounds on the performance of online algorithms for relaxed packing problems

We prove new lower bounds for suitable competitive ratio measures of two relaxed online packing problems: online removable multiple knapsack, and a recently introduced online minimum peak appointment scheduling problem. The high level objective in both problems is to pack arriving items of sizes at most 1 into bins of capacity 1 as efficiently as possible, but the exact formalizations differ. In the appointment scheduling problem, every item has to be assigned to a position, which can be seen as a time interval during a workday of length 1. That is, items are not assigned to bins, but only once all the items are processed, the optimal number of bins subject to chosen positions is determined, and this is the cost of the online algorithm. On the other hand, in the removable knapsack problem there is a fixed number of bins, and the goal of packing items, which consists in choosing a particular bin for every packed item (and nothing else), is to pack as valuable a subset as possible. In this last problem it is possible to reject items, that is, deliberately not pack them, as well as to remove packed items at any later point in time, which adds flexibility to the problem.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2020arXiv

Unbounded lower bound for k-server against weak adversaries

We study the resource augmented version of the $k$-server problem, also known as the $k$-server problem against weak adversaries or the $(h,k)$-server problem. In this setting, an online algorithm using $k$ servers is compared to an offline algorithm using $h$ servers, where $h\le k$. For uniform metrics, it has been known since the seminal work of Sleator and Tarjan (1985) that for any $ε>0$, the competitive ratio drops to a constant if $k=(1+ε) \cdot h$. This result was later generalized to weighted stars (Young 1994) and trees of bounded depth (Bansal et al. 2017). The main open problem for this setting is whether a similar phenomenon occurs on general metrics. We resolve this question negatively. With a simple recursive construction, we show that the competitive ratio is at least $Ω(\log \log h)$, even as $k\to\infty$. Our lower bound holds for both deterministic and randomized algorithms. It also disproves the existence of a competitive algorithm for the infinite server problem on general metrics.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2016arXiv

Online Algorithms for Multi-Level Aggregation

In the Multi-Level Aggregation Problem (MLAP), requests arrive at the nodes of an edge-weighted tree T, and have to be served eventually. A service is defined as a subtree X of T that contains its root. This subtree X serves all requests that are pending in the nodes of X, and the cost of this service is equal to the total weight of X. Each request also incurs waiting cost between its arrival and service times. The objective is to minimize the total waiting cost of all requests plus the total cost of all service subtrees. MLAP is a generalization of some well-studied optimization problems; for example, for trees of depth 1, MLAP is equivalent to the TCP Acknowledgment Problem, while for trees of depth 2, it is equivalent to the Joint Replenishment Problem. Aggregation problem for trees of arbitrary depth arise in multicasting, sensor networks, communication in organization hierarchies, and in supply-chain management. The instances of MLAP associated with these applications are naturally online, in the sense that aggregation decisions need to be made without information about future requests. Constant-competitive online algorithms are known for MLAP with one or two levels. However, it has been open whether there exist constant competitive online algorithms for trees of depth more than 2. Addressing this open problem, we give the first constant competitive online algorithm for networks of arbitrary (fixed) number of levels. The competitive ratio is O(D^4 2^D), where D is the depth of T. The algorithm works for arbitrary waiting cost functions, including the variant with deadlines. We also show several additional lower and upper bound results for some special cases of MLAP, including the Single-Phase variant and the case when the tree is a path.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2016arXiv

Online Packet Scheduling with Bounded Delay and Lookahead

We study the online bounded-delay packet scheduling problem (BDPS), where packets of unit size arrive at a router over time and need to be transmitted over a network link. Each packet has two attributes: a non-negative weight and a deadline for its transmission. The objective is to maximize the total weight of the transmitted packets. This problem has been well studied in the literature, yet its optimal competitive ratio remains unknown: the best upper bound is $1.828$, still quite far from the best lower bound of $ϕ\approx 1.618$. In the variant of BDPS with $s$-bounded instances, each packet can be scheduled in at most $s$ consecutive slots, starting at its release time. The lower bound of $ϕ$ applies even to the special case of $2$-bounded instances, and a $ϕ$-competitive algorithm for $3$-bounded instances was given in Chin et al. Improving that result, and addressing a question posed by Goldwasser, we present a $ϕ$-competitive algorithm for $4$-bounded instances. We also study a variant of BDPS where an online algorithm has the additional power of $1$-lookahead, knowing at time $t$ which packets will arrive at time $t+1$. For BDPS with $1$-lookahead restricted to $2$-bounded instances, we present an online algorithm with competitive ratio $(\sqrt{13} - 1)/2 \approx 1.303$ and we prove a nearly tight lower bound of $(1 + \sqrt{17})/4 \approx 1.281$.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2015arXiv

Pricing Online Decisions: Beyond Auctions

We consider dynamic pricing schemes in online settings where selfish agents generate online events. Previous work on online mechanisms has dealt almost entirely with the goal of maximizing social welfare or revenue in an auction settings. This paper deals with quite general settings and minimizing social costs. We show that appropriately computed posted prices allow one to achieve essentially the same performance as the best online algorithm. This holds in a wide variety of settings. Unlike online algorithms that learn about the event, and then make enforceable decisions, prices are posted without knowing the future events or even the current event, and are thus inherently dominant strategy incentive compatible. In particular we show that one can give efficient posted price mechanisms for metrical task systems, some instances of the $k$-server problem, and metrical matching problems. We give both deterministic and randomized algorithms. Such posted price mechanisms decrease the social cost dramatically over selfish behavior where no decision incurs a charge. One alluring application of this is reducing the social cost of free parking exponentially.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2013arXiv

Better Approximation Bounds for the Joint Replenishment Problem

The Joint Replenishment Problem (JRP) deals with optimizing shipments of goods from a supplier to retailers through a shared warehouse. Each shipment involves transporting goods from the supplier to the warehouse, at a fixed cost C, followed by a redistribution of these goods from the warehouse to the retailers that ordered them, where transporting goods to a retailer $ρ$ has a fixed cost $c_ρ$. In addition, retailers incur waiting costs for each order. The objective is to minimize the overall cost of satisfying all orders, namely the sum of all shipping and waiting costs. JRP has been well studied in Operations Research and, more recently, in the area of approximation algorithms. For arbitrary waiting cost functions, the best known approximation ratio is 1.8. This ratio can be reduced to 1.574 for the JRP-D model, where there is no cost for waiting but orders have deadlines. As for hardness results, it is known that the problem is APX-hard and that the natural linear program for JRP has integrality gap at least 1.245. Both results hold even for JRP-D. In the online scenario, the best lower and upper bounds on the competitive ratio are 2.64 and 3, respectively. The lower bound of 2.64 applies even to the restricted version of JRP, denoted JRP-L, where the waiting cost function is linear. We provide several new approximation results for JRP. In the offline case, we give an algorithm with ratio 1.791, breaking the barrier of 1.8. In the online case, we show a lower bound of 2.754 on the competitive ratio for JRP-L (and thus JRP as well), improving the previous bound of 2.64. We also study the online version of JRP-D, for which we prove that the optimal competitive ratio is 2.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2011arXiv

Better Bounds for Incremental Frequency Allocation in Bipartite Graphs

We study frequency allocation in wireless networks. A wireless network is modeled by an undirected graph, with vertices corresponding to cells. In each vertex we have a certain number of requests, and each of those requests must be assigned a different frequency. Edges represent conflicts between cells, meaning that frequencies in adjacent vertices must be different as well. The objective is to minimize the total number of used frequencies. The offline version of the problem is known to be NP-hard. In the incremental version, requests for frequencies arrive over time and the algorithm is required to assign a frequency to a request as soon as it arrives. Competitive incremental algorithms have been studied for several classes of graphs. For paths, the optimal (asymptotic) ratio is known to be 4/3, while for hexagonal-cell graphs it is between 1.5 and 1.9126. For k-colorable graphs, the ratio of (k+1)/2 can be achieved. In this paper, we prove nearly tight bounds on the asymptotic competitive ratio for bipartite graphs, showing that it is between 1.428 and 1.433. This improves the previous lower bound of 4/3 and upper bound of 1.5. Our proofs are based on reducing the incremental problem to a purely combinatorial (equivalent) problem of constructing set families with certain intersection properties.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2011arXiv

One to Rule Them All: a General Randomized Algorithm for Buffer Management with Bounded Delay

We give a memoryless scale-invariant randomized algorithm for the Buffer Management with Bounded Delay problem that is e/(e-1)-competitive against an adaptive adversary, together with better performance guarantees for many restricted variants, including the s-bounded instances. In particular, our algorithm attains the optimum competitive ratio of 4/3 on 2-bounded instances. Both the algorithm and its analysis are applicable to a more general problem, called Collecting Items, in which only the relative order between packets' deadlines is known. Our algorithm is the optimal randomized memoryless algorithm against adaptive adversary for that problem in a strong sense. While some of provided upper bounds were already known, in general, they were attained by several different algorithms.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2011arXiv

Randomised Buffer Management with Bounded Delay against Adaptive Adversary

We give a new analysis of the RMix algorithm by Chin et al. for the Buffer Management with Bounded Delay problem (or online scheduling of unit jobs to maximise weighted throughput). Unlike the original proof of e/(e-1)-competitiveness, the new one holds even in adaptive-online adversary model. In fact, the proof works also for a slightly more general problem studied by Bie{ń}kowski et al.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2010arXiv

A 4/3-competitive randomized algorithm for online scheduling of packets with agreeable deadlines

In 2005 Li et al. gave a phi-competitive deterministic online algorithm for scheduling of packets with agreeable deadlines with a very interesting analysis. This is known to be optimal due to a lower bound by Hajek. We claim that the algorithm by Li et al. can be slightly simplified, while retaining its competitive ratio. Then we introduce randomness to the modified algorithm and argue that the competitive ratio against oblivious adversary is at most 4/3. Note that this still leaves a gap between the best known lower bound of 5/4 by Chin et al. for randomised algorithms against oblivious adversary.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access