Researcher profile

Tzonelih Hwang

Tzonelih Hwang contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.

ResearcherAffiliation not importedOpen to collaborate

Trust snapshot

Quick read

Trust 21 - EmergingVerification L1Unclaimed author
7works
0followers
2topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Decide how to stay connected

Follow researcher0

Identity and collaboration

How to connect with this researcher

Claiming links this public author record to a researcher profile and unlocks direct collaboration workflows.

Log in to claim

Direct collaboration

Open a focused conversation when the fit is right

Claim this author entity first to unlock direct invitations.

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

7 published item(s)

preprint2021arXiv

Lightweight authenticated quantum key distribution protocols with key recycling

Quantum key distribution (QKD) has been developed for decades and several different QKD protocols have been proposed. But two difficulties limit the implementation of most QKD protocols. First, the involved participants are required to have heavy quantum capabilities, such as quantum joint operation, quantum register, and so on. Second, a hypothetical authenticated classical channel is used in most of the existing QKD protocols and this assumed channel does not exist in reality. To solve both the above limitations at the same time, this study proposes three lightweight authenticated QKD protocols with key recycling and shows these proposed protocols are robust under the collective attack.

preprint2020arXiv

Collusion attack and counterattack on the quantum key agreement via non-maximally entangled cluster states

Recently, Li et al. (Int J Theor Phys: DOI: 10.1007/s10773-020-04588-w, 2020) proposed a multiparty quantum key agreement protocol via non-maximally entangled cluster states. They claimed that the proposed protocol can help all the involved participants have equal influence on the final shared key. However, this study points out a loophole that makes Li et al.'s protocol suffer from a collusion attack, i.e. several dishonest participants can conspire to manipulate the final shared key without being detected by others. To avoid this loophole, an improvement is proposed here.

preprint2020arXiv

Measure-resend authenticated semi-quantum key distribution with single photons

Yu et al. and Li et al. have proposed the measure-resend protocols of authenticated semi-quantum key distribution (ASQKD). A new measure-resend ASQKD protocol is proposed in this paper, which requires a lower burden of quantum resource, needs fewer bits of the pre-shared key, and even provides better qubit efficiency than their protocols. The security proof shows the robustness of the proposed protocol under the collective attack.

preprint2020arXiv

Mediated Asymmetric Semi-Quantum Key Distribution

This study proposes a new mediated asymmetric semi-quantum key distribution (MASQKD) protocol. With the help of a dishonest third party, two classical participants, who have only limited asymmetric quantum capabilities, can share a secret key with each other. The proposed protocol is shown to be immune to several well-known attacks. Furthermore, an improved MASQKD protocol is proposed in which the quantum capabilities of one participant can be further reduced.

preprint2020arXiv

Permutation attack and counterattack on the two-party quantum key agreement over a collective noisy channel

Recently, Yang et al. (Quantum Inf Process 18, 74, 2019) proposed a two-party quantum key agreement protocol over a collective noisy channel. They claimed that their quantum key agreement protocol can ensure both of the participants have equal influence on the final shared key. However, this study shows that the participant who announces the permutation operation can manipulate the final shared key by himself/herself without being detected by the other. To avoid this loophole, an improvement is proposed here.

preprint2020arXiv

Quantum Key Recycling can share key more efficient than BB84

We calculate the key sharing rate of Lu et al.'s Quantum Key Recycling (QKR) protocol. The key sharing rate is another version of the key rate, but it can be calculated for both the Quantum Key Distribution (QKD) protocols and the QKR protocols. We define the key sharing rate in this study and compare the key sharing rate of the QKR protocol to the rate of the QKD protocols. We found Lu et al.'s QKR protocol can be used to share keys more efficiently than BB84 in some situations. We also compare the six-state version of Lu et al.'s QKR protocol to the six-state QKD protocol. The results of this study show the potential advantages of using pre-shared keys to replace the public discussion in quantum protocols.

preprint2020arXiv

Quantum Key Recycling with Optimal Key Recycling Rate based on Error Rate

We propose a new Quantum Key Recycling (QKR) protocol, which can tolerate the noise in the quantum channel. Our QKR protocol recycles the used keys according to the error rate. The key recycling rate of the pre-shared keys in our QKR protocol is optimized depending on the real error rate in the quantum channel. And our QKR protocol has higher efficiency than the exiting QKR protocol with error-tolerance. The security proof shows the security of the recycled keys is universal composable.