BZPEERReading, trust and collaboration for research
Menu

Discover

GraphFollow connections around a paper, topic or saved view.

Workspaces

HomePick up where your research flow left off.InboxHandle requests, replies and notifications from one place.CollectionsCurate reading lists, evidence sets and shareable dossiers.ResearchSee your private provenance graph, trail and imports.CollaborationMove from discovery into focused discussion rooms.PublishDraft, preview and publish full-text research articles.

Network

ExpertsFind specialists worth following or asking for help.CommunitiesJoin research circles organized around shared work.PartnersSee external organizations active around the same topics.

Opportunities

ListingsBrowse roles, calls and collaborations with clearer fit signals.

Account

Log inReturn to your reading and collaboration workspace.Create accountStart saving work, following people and joining teams.
Log inCreate account

Researcher profile

Torsten Mütze

Torsten Mütze contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.

ResearcherAffiliation not importedOpen to collaborate
math.CODiscrete MathematicsComputational Geometry

Trust snapshot

Quick read

Trust 19 - UnverifiedVerification L1Unclaimed author
5works
0followers
3topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Decide how to stay connected

Follow researcher0

Identity and collaboration

How to connect with this researcher

Claiming links this public author record to a researcher profile and unlocks direct collaboration workflows.

Log in to claim

Direct collaboration

Open a focused conversation when the fit is right

Claim this author entity first to unlock direct invitations.

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

5 published item(s)

preprint2026arXiv

Disproving two conjectures on the Hamiltonicity of Venn diagrams

In 1984, Winkler conjectured that every simple Venn diagram with $n$ curves can be extended to a simple Venn diagram with $n+1$ curves. His conjecture is equivalent to the statement that the dual graph of any simple Venn diagram has a Hamilton cycle. In this work, we construct counterexamples to Winkler's conjecture for all $n\geq 6$. As part of this proof, we computed all 3.430.404 simple Venn diagrams with $n=6$ curves (even their number was not previously known), among which we found 72 counterexamples. We also construct monotone Venn diagrams, i.e., diagrams that can be drawn with $n$ convex curves, and are not extendable, for all $n\geq 7$. Furthermore, we also disprove another conjecture about the Hamiltonicity of the (primal) graph of a Venn diagram. Specifically, while working on Winkler's conjecture, Pruesse and Ruskey proved that this graph has a Hamilton cycle for every simple Venn diagram with $n$ curves, and conjectured that this also holds for non-simple diagrams. We construct counterexamples to this conjecture for all $n\geq 4$.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2026arXiv

Listing faces of polytopes

This paper investigates the problem of listing faces of combinatorial polytopes, such as hypercubes, permutahedra, associahedra, and their generalizations. Firstly, we consider the face lattice, which is the inclusion order of all faces of a polytope, and we seek a Hamiltonian cycle in its cover graph, i.e., for any two consecutive faces, one must be a subface of the other, and their dimensions differ by 1. We construct such Hamiltonian cycles for hypercubes, permutahedra, $B$-permutahedra, associahedra, cyclic polytopes, 3-dimensional polytopes, graph associahedra of chordal graphs, and quotientopes. Secondly, we consider facet-Hamiltonian cycles, which are cycles on the skeleton of a polytope that enter and leave every facet exactly once. This notion was recently introduced by Akitaya, Cardinal, Felsner, Kleist, and Lauff [SODA 2025], where the authors conjectured that $B$-permutahedra admit a facet-Hamiltonian cycle for all dimensions. We construct such facet-Hamiltonian cycles in this paper, thus establishing their conjecture as a theorem. A key tool we use are so-called rhombic strips, which are planar spanning subgraphs of the cover graph of the face lattice in which every face is a 4-cycle. Specifically, we construct a rhombic strip in the face lattice of the hypercube of any dimension, and characterize the existence of rhombic strips in the face lattice of 3-dimensional polytopes. Our constructions yield time- and space-efficient algorithms for computing the aforementioned cycles and thus for listing the corresponding combinatorial objects, including ordered set partitions and dissections of a convex polygon.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2022arXiv

Star transposition Gray codes for multiset permutations

Given integers $k\geq 2$ and $a_1,\ldots,a_k\geq 1$, let $\boldsymbol{a}:=(a_1,\ldots,a_k)$ and $n:=a_1+\cdots+a_k$. An $\boldsymbol{a}$-multiset permutation is a string of length $n$ that contains exactly $a_i$ symbols $i$ for each $i=1,\ldots,k$. In this work we consider the problem of exhaustively generating all $\boldsymbol{a}$-multiset permutations by star transpositions, i.e., in each step, the first entry of the string is transposed with any other entry distinct from the first one. This is a far-ranging generalization of several known results. For example, it is known that permutations ($a_1=\cdots=a_k=1$) can be generated by star transpositions, while combinations ($k=2$) can be generated by these operations if and only if they are balanced ($a_1=a_2$), with the positive case following from the middle levels theorem. To understand the problem in general, we introduce a parameter $Δ(\boldsymbol{a}):=n-2\max\{a_1,\ldots,a_k\}$ that allows us to distinguish three different regimes for this problem. We show that if $Δ(\boldsymbol{a})<0$, then a star transposition Gray code for $\boldsymbol{a}$-multiset permutations does not exist. We also construct such Gray codes for the case $Δ(\boldsymbol{a})>0$, assuming that they exist for the case $Δ(\boldsymbol{a})=0$. For the case $Δ(\boldsymbol{a})=0$ we present some partial positive results. Our proofs establish Hamilton-connectedness or Hamilton-laceability of the underlying flip graphs, and they answer several cases of a recent conjecture of Shen and Williams. In particular, we prove that the middle levels graph is Hamilton-laceable.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2021arXiv

Gray codes and symmetric chains

We consider the problem of constructing a cyclic listing of all bitstrings of length $2n+1$ with Hamming weights in the interval $[n+1-\ell,n+\ell]$, where $1\leq \ell\leq n+1$, by flipping a single bit in each step. This is a far-ranging generalization of the well-known middle two levels problem (the case $\ell=1$). We provide a solution for the case $\ell=2$, and we solve a relaxed version of the problem for general values of $\ell$, by constructing cycle factors for those instances. The proof of the first result uses the lexical matchings introduced by Kierstead and Trotter, which we generalize to arbitrary consecutive levels of the hypercube. The proof of the second result uses symmetric chain decompositions of the hypercube, a concept known from the theory of posets. We also present several new constructions of such decompositions based on lexical matchings. In particular, we construct four pairwise edge-disjoint symmetric chain decompositions of the $n$-dimensional hypercube for any $n\geq 12$.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2020arXiv

On L-shaped point set embeddings of trees: first non-embeddable examples

An L-shaped embedding of a tree in a point set is a planar drawing of the tree where the vertices are mapped to distinct points and every edge is drawn as a sequence of two axis-aligned line segments. There has been considerable work on establishing upper bounds on the minimum cardinality of a point set to guarantee that any tree of the same size with maximum degree 4 admits an L-shaped embedding on the point set. However, no non-trivial lower bound is known to this date, i.e., no known $n$-vertex tree requires more than $n$ points to be embedded. In this paper, we present the first examples of $n$-vertex trees for $n\in\{13,14,16,17,18,19,20\}$ that require strictly more points than vertices to admit an L-shaped embedding. Moreover, using computer help, we show that every tree on $n\leq 12$ vertices admits an L-shaped embedding in every set of $n$ points. We also consider embedding ordered trees, where the cyclic order of the neighbors of each vertex in the embedding is prescribed. For this setting, we determine the smallest non-embeddable ordered tree on $n=10$ vertices, and we show that every ordered tree on $n\leq 9$ or $n=11$ vertices admits an L-shaped embedding in every set of $n$ points. We also construct an infinite family of ordered trees which do not always admit an L-shaped embedding, answering a question raised by Biedl, Chan, Derka, Jain, and Lubiw.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access