Researcher profile

Tomomi Yokota

Tomomi Yokota contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.

ResearcherAffiliation not importedOpen to collaborate

Trust snapshot

Quick read

Trust 15 - UnverifiedVerification L1Unclaimed author
3works
0followers
1topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Decide how to stay connected

Follow researcher0

Identity and collaboration

How to connect with this researcher

Claiming links this public author record to a researcher profile and unlocks direct collaboration workflows.

Log in to claim

Direct collaboration

Open a focused conversation when the fit is right

Claim this author entity first to unlock direct invitations.

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

3 published item(s)

preprint2022arXiv

Global existence and stabilization in a diffusive predator-prey model with population flux by attractive transition

The diffusive Lotka-Volterra predator-prey model \begin{eqnarray*} \left\{ \begin{array}{rcll} u_t &=& \nabla\cdot \left[ d_1\nabla u + χv^2 \nabla \Big(\dfrac{u}{v}\Big)\right] +u(m_1-u+av), \qquad & x\inΩ, \ t>0, \\ v_t &=& d_2Δv+v(m_2-bu-v), \qquad & x\inΩ, \ t>0, \end{array} \right. \end{eqnarray*} is considered in a bounded domain $Ω\subset\mathbb{R}^n$, $n \in\{2,3\}$, under Neumann boundary condition, where $d_1, d_2, m_1, χ, a, b$ are positive constants and $m_2$ is a real constant. The purpose of this paper is to establish global existence and boundedness of classical solutions in the case $n=2$ and global existence of weak solutions in the case $n=3$ as well as show long-time stabilization. More precisely, we prove that the solutions $(u(\cdot,t), v(\cdot,t))$ converge to the constant steady state $(u_*, v_*)$ as $t \to \infty$, where $u_*, v_*$ solves $u_*(m_1-u_*+av_*)=v_*(m_2-bu_*-v_*)=0$ with $u_* > 0$ (covering both coexistence as well as prey-extinction cases).

preprint2021arXiv

Boundedness and finite-time blow-up in a quasilinear parabolic-elliptic-elliptic attraction-repulsion chemotaxis system

This paper deals with the quasilinear attraction-repulsion chemotaxis system \begin{align*} \begin{cases} u_t=\nabla\cdot \big((u+1)^{m-1}\nabla u -χu(u+1)^{p-2}\nabla v +ξu(u+1)^{q-2}\nabla w\big) +f(u), \\[1.05mm] 0=Δv+αu-βv, \\[1.05mm] 0=Δw+γu-δw \end{cases} \end{align*} in a bounded domain $Ω\subset \mathbb{R}^n$ ($n \in \mathbb{N}$) with smooth boundary $\partialΩ$, where $m, p, q \in \mathbb{R}$, $χ, ξ, α, β, γ, δ>0$ are constants. Moreover, it is supposed that the function $f$ satisfies $f(u)\equiv0$ in the study of boundedness, whereas, when considering blow-up, it is assumed that $m>0$ and $f$ is a function of logistic type such as $f(u)=λu-μu^κ$ with $λ\ge 0$, $μ>0$ and $κ>1$ sufficiently close to~$1$, in the radially symmetric setting. In the case that $ξ=0$ and $f(u) \equiv 0$, global existence and boundedness have been proved under the condition $p<m+\frac2n$. Also, in the case that $m=1$, $p=q=2$ and $f$ is a function of logistic type, finite-time blow-up has been established by assuming $χα-ξγ>0$. This paper classifies boundedness and blow-up into the cases $p<q$ and $p>q$ without any condition for the sign of $χα-ξγ$ and the case $p=q$ with $χα-ξγ<0$ or $χα-ξγ>0$.

preprint2021arXiv

Remarks on two connected papers about Keller-Segel systems with nonlinear production

These notes aim to provide a deeper insight on the specifics of two articles dealing with chemotaxis models with nonlinear production. More precisely, we are referring to the papers &#34;Boundedness of solutions to a quasilinear parabolic-parabolic chemotaxis model with nonlinear signal production&#34; by X. Tao, S. Zhou and M. Ding [J. Math. Anal. Appl. 474:1 (2019) 733-747] and &#34;Boundedness for a fully parabolic Keller-Segel model with sublinear segregation and superlinear aggregation&#34; by S. Frassu and G. Viglialoro [Acta Appl. Math. 171:1 (2021), 19]. These works, independently published in these last years, present results leaving open room for further improvement. Indeed, in the first a gap in the proof of the main claim appears, whereas the cornerstone assumption in the second is not sharp. In these pages we give a more complete picture to the relative underlying comprehension.